Press Enter to search or select a section to narrow results
Share This Article
Do you agree with that statement in your post Steve?
Well Ron, I made the statement so I don't know what you mean, do I agree with the statement?
Fmr. CIA Director John Brennan: This is an abuse of power
SUBJECT
1. 15-16 Presidents have owned African slaves
2. 5-7 Presidents have Started protracted wars.....
……...Iraq / Afghanistan are still waged since President Bush
3. President Reagan, defied the 2nd Amendment....sold weapons to Iran and imported cocaine
4. ALL modern Presidents used the CIA for torture, murder and disruption of Democracy in other nations....
No, bozo exCIA director CAN define, stop or say/write that a President Abuses Presidential Power
……..THAT WOULD be NONSENSE...johnBrennan……..
Steve, either you agree what you posted or not. Which one is it?
I stand by MY ASSERTIONS Ron. It's impossible for me to disagree with MY ASSERTIONS.
1. "John Brennan says we want to silence him."
2. "We don't give a damn about that."
3. "We are just relieved that finally his access to and abuse of classified information has been rebuked and revoked."
Maybe you are confused about my use of the pronoun "we"?
You are 100% correct, That is the reason why I asked you for clarification. If these are your so called ASSERTIONS, then, what part do WE come in to play? I am only talking to one individual and not the multitudes.
Now can you stand on your own words or NOT? Let us try it One more time.
Steve, either you agree what you posted or not. Which one is it?
The "we" is me and those at Fox News and elsewhere, who listen to Brennan on MSNBC and understand how totally corrupt he is. So yes Ron, I emphatically agree with myself. And to be absolutely clear, I agree with what I posted.
The Nicole Wallace donkey show continues in full swing today.
This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics. It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about the cost of speaking out. My principles are worth far more than clearances. I will not relent.
What is Brennan's proof that the President wants to "suppress free speech"? What is Brennans proof the President wants to "punish critics"? There is none, it's all a fiction.
"...… Brennan......totally corrupt he is. So yes Ron, I emphatically agree ……..The Nicole Wallace
....What is Brennan's proof that the President wants to "suppress free speech"?...…"
Saturday, August 18th 2018 at 9:55AM
Steve Williams
******************************************************************************
I emphatically AGREE...…
1. Nicole Wallace gave us 'weapons of mass destruction for BUSH'
2. Present trump$ette CIA director was the gal that played with naked guys with batteries on Scrotum
AND
3. John Owen Brennan as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from March 2013 to January 2017
Found, spied on, heard, evidence from Russia, USA, England, Sweden, Seychelles, UAE
about a conspiracy to Favor one Candidate in USA 2016 Presidential Election.....
Steve, your question: "What is Brennan's proof that the President wants to "suppress free speech"? Brennan is the one who started the Russian investigation on Trump in the first place.
Trump has no prove that Brennan' misused his authority to investigate Trump, for him to revoke Brennan's security clearance, now did he?
What's all that have to do with anything Ron? Not John Brennan's nor anyone's free speech has been suppressed.
Steve, this is a easy question: Your Question; What's all that have to do with anything Ron?
My Answer: If it was not for John Brennan's investigation on Russia tampering with the Presidential Election, Trump's life would be much easier between himself and the American people, that is what's all that have to do with anything Steve.
Now answer my question that you seen to conveniently over looked Steve.
Trump has no prove that Brennan' misused his authority to investigate Trump, for him to revoke Brennan's security clearance, now did he?
Ron, you have still not answered my question: "What is Brennan's proof that the President wants to "suppress free speech"?
At this point Steve, Trump suppressed Brennan's access to his security clearance, not for the reasons listed as violations one can lose such a high honor but Brennan's comments about Trump in public, now that act was not on that list. Can't you see that?
Trump has no prove that Brennan' misused his authority to investigate Trump, for him to revoke Brennan's security clearance, now did he?
So there is no suppression of free speech Ron, correct? Correct.
No!!! No!!!Steve, YOU answer my question that you seen to conveniently over looked Steve. NOW!!!
Trump has no prove that Brennan' misused his authority to investigate Trump, for him to revoke Brennan's security clearance, now did he?
Brennan' misused his authority to investigate Trump, for him to revoke Brennan's security clearance, now did he?
Sunday, August 19th 2018 at 10:11AM
Deacon Ron Gray
************************************************************************
No, trump$ette is the USA President 2018
1. Steve Bannon said.."... the Trump Tower meeting between the president’s son and a group of Russians
during the 2016 election campaign as “treasonous” and “unpatriotic”...………
2. CIA Brennan said.."... Trumps' Helinski actions were 'no less than treasonous'.."
...littleStevie wonder LOST his security clearance SO yes brennanTalk is close …
LOSE IT..OK by me
Hey Robert, if you are going to quote me, quote me right. Here is what I said. “Trump has no prove that Brennan' misused his authority to investigate Trump, for him to revoke Brennan's security clearance, now did he?”
Pay attention...
Sorry Ron, I asked first.
What is Brennan's proof that the President wants to "suppress free speech"? What is Brennans proof the President wants to "punish critics"? There is none, it's all a fiction.
Saturday, August 18th 2018 at 9:55AM
Steve Williams | delete
Trump thought he "punished his critics" by taking their security clearance away from them, that is all he done and why.
Trump gears up to strip more clearances from officials tied to Russia investigation https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tr...
Trump has no prove that Brennan' misused his authority to investigate Trump, for him to revoke Brennan's security clearance, now did he?
FACE THE FACTS IN THIS CASE.
That's fine Ron, I don't need you to know the answers to my questions. Trump has all the proof he needs to revoke Brennan's security clearance. No proof is needed if Brennan misused his authority.
How Steve How?
How what Ron?
"Trump has all the proof he needs to revoke Brennan's security clearance."
YOUR WORDS: No proof is needed if Brennan misused his authority.
Because Trump has no proof and his only purpose is to silence his critics.
Steve, I see that you made no mention of the article I asked you to read. Did you read this article? Trump gears up to strip more clearances from officials tied to Russia investigation https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tr...
I know that you did not read this article at all because you want to put your head in the sands but guess what is in the air?
Steve, we need to remember the important lessons of Watergate. The reason that the revelation about Nixon’s list was so disturbing then—the fact that a president would be willing and able to use his power to create a climate of fear, smear opponents, and literally shut down his American citizens through ruthless action—remains just as important today. Right now, Trump is trying to create the same kind of toxic atmosphere that Nixon produced. His explicit goal is to silence opponents and to discredit them in the public eye. If this becomes acceptable, the next steps might be even worse.
As we enter the midterm season, where the country will finally have the chance to create an actual check against this president through divided government, the question remains: What are voters willing to do about all this? Is the electorate capable of getting so angry about a situation that it is willing to take action through the ballot box, or have government institutions broken down so much that in Washington, anything goes?
Only time will tell.
The Washington Post is your God Ron, not mine. No proof is needed because the President does need your approval. Your approval is not needed because you do not have the facts, the President does. Your aproval is not needed because you have no idea how much proof is needed, or even what proof is.
I think your news Gods call these things "predicates".
Proof Steve is a reason why to do a thing. I see that you did not read the link to help you understand that Trump gears up to strip more clearances from officials tied to Russia investigation. Can't you see that Trump is using his powers as a tool to silence more Americans?
By The Way Steve, let me correct you right now. The Washington Post is not a GOD but simply just another news source, that I reference. Get your act together and pay attention.
President Trump has told advisers that he is eager to strip more security clearances as part of an escalating attack against people who have criticized him or played a role in the investigation of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign, two White House officials said.
Open your eyes and pay attention.
"Can't you see that Trump is using his powers as a tool to silence more Americans?" No Ron, I don't see that at all. NO ONE IS BEING SILENCED!
"two White House officials said..." What White House officials Ron?
You know that the press don’t have to reveal their sources. Let us get back on topic. Steve, did you this video report? Then why is he Yanking security clearances from a retired Law official and making a list of Americans Who he wish to retaliate on?
"the press don’t have to reveal their sources..." Not to YOU Ron, of course not. You know I'm a huge fan of that donkey Nicole, I'm watching her right now.
Steve, Then why is Mr. Trump is Yanking security clearances from a retired Law official and making a list of Americans Who he wish to retaliate on?
John Brennan violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. That's why his security clearances were pulled Ron.
John Brennan violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. Hey Steve, you do know that John Brennan is retired from government Don’t you?
By The Way, Do you know what constitutional law Brennan violated?
John Brennan violated his oath by using his position to undermine Article Two of the Constitution. Do you remember this testimony Ron?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?428636-1/cia...
Yes I remember this MAY 23, 2017 open hearing. Now Steve tell me how exactly did John Brennan violated his oath by using his position to undermine Article Two of the Constitution?
Maybe you don't remember what Brennan said in that open hearing. Did you post something about it Ron?
What is the matter Steve, you did not see you question that is right in front of you or you can’t answer my question, that is the reason why you ran like hell from? You are acting like Harry now, WOW!!!
Pay attention Steve.
Now Steve tell me how exactly did John Brennan violated his oath by using his position to undermine Article Two of the Constitution?
Brennan violated his oath in a multitude of ways.
At minute 30 Brennan testifies "I don't do evidence." That's a violation of his oath.
Now you find that’s a Violation of what law in The Constitution?
YOUR WORDS: Brennan violated his oath in a multitude of ways. You got multiple violations what are they?
Brennan was the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. HIS WHOLE PURPOSE WAS TO "DO EVIDENCE".
What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?
What do you think Ron, how many ways did Brennan not "do evidence"?
Do you know the reason why you can't answer my simple question Steve, is because you have been duped by right wing radio and FOX NEWS that put out that FAKE NEWS that Trump had a viable reason for firing John Brennan by telling Trump's base that violating the Constitution of The United States of America was Trump's reason.
Now the sad part about FAKE NEWS, you can't proof a thing about it, like John Brennan broke multitude of laws in The Constitution, that you are promoting Steve which you can't prove, this is a dead end, You Steve, have been deceived, tricked, swindle · defraud · cheat · trick · hoodwink · hoax · dupe · take in · mislead · delude · fool · outwit · misguide · lead on · inveigle · seduce · ensnare · entrap · beguile · double-cross · gull · con · bamboozle · do · sting · gyp · diddle · fiddle · swizzle · rip off · shaft · bilk · rook · pull a fast one on · pull someone's leg · take for a ride · pull the wool over someone's eyes · throw dust in someone's eyes · put one over on · sell a pup to · take to the cleaners · sucker · snooker · stiff · euchre · bunco · hornswoggle · pull a swifty on · cozen · sharp · mulct.
Your Words: What do you think Ron, how many ways did Brennan not "do evidence"?
This is no proof of what multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?
Your answer is complete Bull 💩 and don't have a inch of truth, nowhere in your statement. You do remember what LIE you are trying to Bull 💩 me on, here on Black In America, in the first place Steve, well do you?
I think Ron that you're completely lunatic to think my opinion of John Brennan has anything to do with Fox News. My opinion of John Brennan is like my opinion of you, like my opinion of MSNBC, like my opinion of Jonathan Lemire and Nicole Wallace. It's based on what I see coming from all of you, a burning desire to abrogate the decision of the majority electors in 2016.
Since you think that I am completely lunatic to think my opinion of John Brennan has anything to do with Fox News, then answer my question Steve, "What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?"
We have not talked about the list Trump made, yet!!!
As you know Ron, the folks at MSNBC are having multiple orgasms over Manafort and Cohen, a real circle jerk. Do you think that would be the case if not for John Brennan? It would not be and you know it.
These two men have been convicted by a jury of their peers that both men is guilty as hell. Donald Trump's Attorney And Fixer Michael Cohen Pleads Guilty To 8 Federal Counts. They include five counts of tax evasion, one count of falsifying submissions to a bank and two counts involving unlawful campaign contributions.
These are the events that was in the background when John Brennan discovered the involvement with the Russians. Now hear you come, after the FACT still trying your best to spend off the FACT that Cohen and Manafort has the President worried because he knows that he is a co-conspirator in the Russia affair and he don't want to be called out to the American people.
YOUR QUESTION: Do you think that would be the case if not for John Brennan? That is right Steve, The Truth is the light and this you can proof.
The Truth is coming to the light of day, enjoy it Steve because that means I have been right in this case, all of this time and now that Fixer Michael Cohen had Pleaded Guilty To 8 Federal Counts, that is the proof I was waiting to come to the surface and it did. So stop crying like a little Dog Steve.
Do you still support Trump now, after this news of guilt is known about Trump's MR. FIX IT MAN?
OH!!! By the way Steve, you still have not answered this question yet: ""What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?"
Now in the Paul's case, let us take a look at What the Manafort Verdict Means. This is Robert Mueller’s biggest victory yet, in one of the most successful special counsel investigations in history and many of you are on the wrong side of history.
With Tuesday’s convictions in the criminal trial of President Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has struck another blow in his investigation: five guilty pleas, 32 indicted individuals, 187 charges revealing startling evidence of Russia’s 2016 attack on our democracy, and now the conviction of one of the top operators in the Trump campaign orbit. Mr. Manafort’s conviction on eight separate counts means he could spend the rest of his life in prison.
Trump said that he picked all of the best people, you remember that quote, don't you. That was a LIE and now you should now see the light of Truth and this is NOT FAKE NEWS.
Because you Ron, like John Brennan, want to annul the vote of all Americans like myself, to destroy America and cheer on those in authority working to destroy America, you should never ever have a security clearance either.
P.S. Nothing's preventing you Ron, from reviewing Brennan's testimony and hearing his many Constitutional violations yourself. I'll resume my own review when the Manafort and Cohen party has blown over. And you may not have even heard of the murder of Mollie Tibbetts.
YOUR WORDS: Because you Ron, like John Brennan, want to annul the vote of all Americans like myself, to destroy America and cheer on those in authority working to destroy America, you should never ever have a security clearance either.
What makes yo think that I want to annul the vote of all Americans like myself, to destroy America and cheer on those in authority working to destroy America? Steve, that tactic of accusing me of such a thing, is real old to me. You are just blowing "SMOKE" to hide the FACT that you could not tell me and the readership, here at Black In America "What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?" Answer the question and proof what you said, can you do that?
Steve, I will honor and respect the family request that the media not help to politicize the murder of Mollie Tibbetts. Bottom Line.
Let's get something straight Ron. I'm not talking to the BIA readership. I'M TALKING TO YOU.
Their is more then just me and you that is paying attention to this blog, just look at the hit numbers. You have made a very powerful accusation of wanting to annul the vote of all Americans like myself, to destroy America and cheer on those in authority working to destroy America, that is something you have no evidence of what so ever.
Now answer my question Steve Williams: "What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?" Answer the question and proof what you said, can you do that?
So far NO YOU CAN"T!!! What a MAROON!!!
Just like I thought Ron. You had not heard a thing about Mollie Tibbetts.
my question Steve Williams: "What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?" Answer the question and proof what you said is true, can you do that?
So far YOU HAVE NOT PROOFED YOUR POINT YET, WHY? What a MAROON!!!
Maroons were Africans who had escaped from slavery in the Americas and mixed with the indigenous peoples of the Americas, and formed independent settlements. The term can also be applied to their descendants.
But Iowa Democratic party officials on Wednesday would not say whether they stood by their immigration platform, and instead characterized the matter as a "partisan fight."
"The Iowa Democratic Party is going to honor the wishes of the Tibbetts family to let them grieve in private and will not turn this senseless tragedy into a partisan fight," Iowa Democratic Party chairman Troy Price told Fox News.
The national uproar over Tibbetts' slaying also threatens to upend two key House races underway in the state, which are considered potentially pivotal to Democrats' chances of retaking the House in November's midterm elections.
The 2018 Iowa Democratic Party platform, in a section entitled "Statement of Issues," reads: "We oppose: detaining undocumented minors, immigrant detention/deportation quotas, locally enforcing federal immigration laws, mass raids/related enforcement practices, religious exclusion, 'papers please,' unnecessary travel-bans, abrogating birthright-citizenship, separating minor children from their parents when they are trying to enter the country, internment and concentration camps."
The platform was adopted at a state convention in June. It goes on in a "Statement of Principles" to "affirm the Democratic Party’s contributions to our nation’s heritage, accomplishments, and diversity."
You see what you did. In your weak, sick ass mind, you wanted to slip in this Mollie Tibbetts Issue, even after I said this to you: "Steve, I will honor and respect the family request that the media not help to politicize the murder of Mollie Tibbetts. Bottom Line."
The reason why you can't answer my question of "What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violate?" Because once again, you brought this weak ass Bull 💩 to the strongest of people. YOU LIED on this blog to the people here on Black In America, who is reading your LYING words and you know you LIED and you got busted in the act.
Their is no Constitution Law that John Brennan violated and your ass knows that truth for a FACT. You are a compulsive LIAR and the truth is nowhere in these words: "John Brennan violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. That's why his security clearances were pulled Ron."
Tuesday, August 21st 2018 at 12:48AM
Steve Williams | delete | block member
That is a LIE and you know it and you can't prove a damn thing you said and you know it but you don't care, that is sad for a grown man to act, that is the actions of lying heathen * a philistine · boor · oaf · ignoramus · lout · yahoo · vulgarian · plebeian · barbarian · savage · beast · brute · pleb · peasant · oik · hoon or WHAT A MAROON!!!
Now that the MSNBC hysteria about Cohen is over, I have time to go through Brennan's testimony again, something you will never do Ron. In his opening statement Brennan lies about when his investigation into Russia started, and the purpose of the investigation. Two more violations of his oath to uphold the Constitution. And he probably lied about giving the same briefing to each of the 8 senators and congresspersons he briefed.
The guilty plea of Michael Cohen is just turning to the light. I know you want Cohen's connection to Trump is not over but just getting started and you can't stand it. LOL!!!
Brennan lies to who Steve, are you talking about The House Intelligence Committee about when his investigation into Russia started, and what LIE did Brennan tell for the purpose of the investigation?
Steve, "What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violated?"
Talk to me about your clear points to your accusations about John Brennan and not these generalities you are spouting or you are finally getting your talking points as a Trump troll, that you don't understand yet? LOL!!!!
Yes Ron, the Cohen hysteria is over. Brennan testified that his investigation started in late July 2016. That is a lie. It started much earlier than that.
Trump has good reason to be worried now because six of Trump’s Choice picks to fix things are now working for Mueller and they are talking.
So off-topic about Michael Cohen is okay but off-topic about poor Mollie Tibbetts isn't. You people are sick, sick, SICK.
Mollie Tibbetts was never the topic here, this you know for a FACT. STOP BULL 💩 ing yourself Steve.
If Mollie Tibbetts was never the subject here, why did you bring up Michael Cohen again?
Steve, that is simple. Because of Michael Cohen ties to Trump and the Russian investigation in this blog power and suspense of misuse of powers. Now Ms.
Mollie Tibbetts murder has nothing to do with this subject and I won't politicize her death as the family asked, that I will respect. Got it!!!
Steve, like always, if you want to run off and talk about something else, that is your business, go somewhere else and start your own blog.
Got it!!!
You were never the subject here Ron. MSNBC doesn't give a **** about Mollie Tibbett's family. You never heard a thing about Mollie Tibbetts from Nicole Wallace or any of the others, BECAUSE THEY WERE TOO BUSY ENTHUSING OVER COHEN. Instead of just admitting you hadn't heard anything, you quick looked up that story about the Iowa Democratic Party not wanting anyone to know Mollie's killer was an illegal alien, so they came up with this BS excuse for your sin, about respecting the Tibbett family. Your awareness of that BS excuse came through Fox News reporting, not MSNBC.
I'm still waiting for your reply Ron.
Yes Ron, the Cohen hysteria is over. Brennan testified that his investigation started in late July 2016. That is a lie. It started much earlier than that.
Friday, August 24th 2018 at 4:54PM
Steve Williams | delete
If ever you decide to get back on topic...
"What multitude of laws in The Constitution did John Brennan violate Steve?"
I've given you four examples already Ron and that's in less than 30 minutes of testimony.
When, before you felt the ague to run like hell from this subject? Trump has no proof and his only purpose is to silence his critics.
Steve, I see that you made no mention of the article I asked you to read. Did you read this article? Trump gears up to strip more clearances from officials tied to Russia investigation https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tr...
Steve, do you feel that Trump was right by silencing his critics?
Brennan is spewing hate just like he was before.
Former CIA Director John Brennan on Friday escalated his war of words with President Trump -- agreeing with HBO host Bill Maher than Trump’s presidency “is the third great crisis in American history” behind the Revolutionary War and Civil War.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/25...
Steve, that link is not telling me a thing about how do you feel about Trump, do you feel Trump was right by silencing his critics?
As I said Ron, I disagree with your premise. President Trump has not silenced anyone, nor ever will. America is a democracy remember.
Trump wants this country to be an autocracy, That is the reason why he acts and LIES to the American people, the way he does.
President Trump wants this country to be what it is, a democracy. That's why he was elected President.
Outside of the tax cuts, which people like you and myself never reaped any benefits from, which means since the rich will not be carrying their fare share of the tax load, then who will pay? US little people.
Tell me something Steve, what has Trump done to benefit the American people both Middle and lower class?
The rich carry more than their "fare" share of the tax burden. All Americans benefit that President Trump has given them some long overdue relief.
Hey Steve, pay attention. Did I ask you anything about the rich, well did I?
The question is: “What has Trump done to benefit the American people both Middle and lower class?”
Define "middle" class and "lower" class. Not that I believe in "classes" any more than I believe in "races". It's all useless identity.
Steve, I believe that this is a social group of people and the Middle Class group is between the upper class and the lower class, who are known as the working classes or The blue collar worker, which includes the professional and business workers and their families.
Now the Low Class in this country are the social group that has the lowest status; the working class and non- working people. Both these groups transcend RACE.
The question is: “What has Trump done to benefit the American people both Middle and lower class?”
Please log in to post comments.
John Brennan says we want to silence him. We don't give a damn about that. We are just relieved that finally his access to and abuse of classified information has been rebuked and revoked.