Kavanaugh answers questions about gambling in written response

The Democrats are digging for dirt but aren't having any success.

Are you looking at the responses from Brett Kavanaugh to the questions?

Looking at the written responses from Kavanaugh is a great idea Ron. Have you done that? Where can I find them?

These are the same questions you seek, is right in front of you that Brett Kavanaugh answered.

It's a simple question Ron. There is somewhere on the web where you can find complete answers to all the written questions submitted by the Democrats after the confirmation oral testimony was complete. Of course I can find it but I'm sure you already have done that so it should be easier just to ask you. Where is it?

From my research, that Infor has not hit the web yet, give it time. Meanwhile, let us get right back to the material right directly in front of you, right now Steve. The written questions submitted by the Democrats after the confirmation oral testimony was complete but did you see Brett Kavanaugh answers?

That is what's making Breaking News Steve, Brett Kavanaugh answers.

The Senate keeps a record of these things Ron. 263 pages in this case. Do you dare take a look at them?

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media...

That was great Steve, that you found the transcripts of Senator Chuck Grassley's Questions for the Record Judge Brett Kavanaugh Nominee, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. By the way Steve, I did dare to take a look and read, the first 15 pages.

These are not the GOP Held from the public E-mail's, evolvement that The Trump Administration did not want the American People to see because those Kavanaugh E-mails put a different light, on what he said under oath.


Steve What is your point?

These written answers are the topic of your blog Ron, specifically the gambling questions are referenced in your title. I don't remember Rachel talking about withheld emails but it's taken so long to get you talk about written answers, I might have forgotten by now what if anything was said about emails.

If you forgotten by now what if anything was said about emails, then all you need to do review the video at the top of this blog Steve to refresh your mind.

Watching Rachel once is bad enough but I guess I have no choice but to watch her a second time and probably at least 4 or 5 or more times, to have any hope of getting you on topic.

There is nothing about witheld emails Ron. There were questions about the Eureka Club and Kavanaugh's answer was that "Eureka" sometimes used in the email headers in the scheduling emails for those get togethers with a group of friends. Do you find that somehow significant?

Rachel specifically said that the question of the Eureka Club was "brand spanking new" not asked during the 4 days of the hearing.

Here's Leahy's full question, on page 73 of the record, and Kavanaugh's full answer. I do not see Leahy reference any email or give any context at all for the question.

62. What is the Eureka Club? When did you take part in activities or gatherings under that name or a substantially similar name? And what were the activities associated with these gatherings?

RESPONSE: A group of friends sometimes gathered for dinner. The scheduling emails for those dinners would sometimes be titled “Eureka.”