Is Trump WH blocking CIA director from briefing Senate?

The Full Senate is scheduled to receive a full briefing from Saudi Arabia and defense secretary James Mattis. They will not hear from Gina Haspel or any other intelligence officials about the murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi, according to the Guardian.


Now how can the Full Senate be informed fully, if Gina Haspe, The Head of The CIA is not there?

We don't trust the CIA Ron, and you people don't trust Gina Haspel. Or did you forget?

Gina Haspe and members of the CIA heard the murder tape, now those people who are holding the breathing refused to hear the evidence.

How can the Senate be accurately brief if the Head of CIA is not there?

Did you forget Ron, you opposed Gina Haspel's confirmation because of waterboarding or some such nonsense? Now all of a sudden you've decided she's indispensable. How convenient, you hypocrite.

The question might be, how can the Senate be accurately brief if the head of CIA IS there.

SHUT-UP Steve, you sound like a fool. Gina Haspel was hand picked by TRUMP to run the CIA and she also heard the murder tape and those other Republicans did not. Why is The Trump White House is now going against Trump's hand picked person to run the CIA and their report of a strong confidence level for the Saudi Crown Prince?

This is the torturer you're talking about Ron, hand picked by Trump and you love her now?

No Steve, Gina Haspel heard the conversation and the circumstances leading up to the torture And the murderer of Jamal Khashoggi, now would she be the best person to inform Congress about the information that the CIA found?

She did inform Congress but they didn't tell you about that, did they Ron?

You saw this information in this video report Steve?

STEVE, You saw this information in this video report Steve?

Secretary of State James Mattis, who did not want to hear the murder caught on tape of the Brutal Murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

Now how can the Full Senate be informed fully, if Gina Haspe, The Head of The CIA is not there?

What makes you think Gina Haspel would have informed the Senate fully Ron. You are full of baseless imaginings.

P.S. I WATCHED THIS VIDEO!!!

YOUR WORDS: What makes you think Gina Haspel would have informed the Senate fully Ron. You are full of baseless imaginings.

Because she is the one who heard the murder caught on tape of the Brutal Murder of Jamal Khashoggi. That is the closest that anyone in the Senet has been to the murder evidence the Brutal of Jamal Khashoggi. Now is there another more qualified?

I'm sure Mattis and Pompeo gave a more than adequate briefing but the whiners seem to have won.

CIA Director Gina Haspel is expected to brief leaders of multiple Senate committees Tuesday about the October murder of Saudi activist and writer Jamal Khashoggi, a source told Fox News.

The source said the briefing will include leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Armed Services Committee and Appropriations Committee.

Haspel did not attend a briefing about Khashoggi's killing that was given to all senators last week by Defense Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Her absence upset lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, with Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., vowing to hold up Congress' agenda for the current lame-duck session until he heard from the CIA director.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cia-direc...

This is what I been talking about all of this time Steve. It is only right that CIA Director Gina Haspel brief the senate and not someone who did not hear the evidence of Jamal Khashoggi's Brutal Murder.

So are you a Corker fan now Ron, and a Graham fan too? I think you'll follow ANYONE ANYWHERE in your disrepect for the Presidency.

Hi No Steve, I want the truth to be known in the Senate and it was the right thing to do to hear from CIA director Gina Haspell About the evidence of that Brutal murder of a U.S. citizen and reporter.

I agree with this senate 100% on letting the CIA director speak to the Senate, 100%.

So you're 100 percent with Corker and Graham. What's Schumer's reaction?

On a national security issue of such importance, it would be customary for a senior intelligence official to take part. On this occasion, the absence of the intelligence community is all the more glaring, as Haspel travelled to Istanbul to hear audio tapes of Khashoggi’s murder provided by Turkish intelligence, and then briefed Donald Trump.

What better person to give the Senate since she went to Istanbul to hear audio tapes of Khashoggi’s murder provided by Turkish intelligence, and then briefed Donald Trump, the president knew the impact would be as his sided with the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for the brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi' on the senate and that was the reason why Trump didn't want her to speak to The Senate.

Not on this point I agree 100 percent with Corker and Graham as GOP Senators break from Trump on the Crown Prince involvement.

WHY do trump side with The Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman instead of his very own CIA director Gina Haspel?

Looks like Schumer's reaction is WEAK. No wonder you didn't answer my question Ron.

The Senate's top Democrat, Chuck Schumer of New York, called on Haspel to testify before the full Senate after sitting in on the Tuesday briefing.

“While I will not discuss the content of the Haspel briefing, it reinforced the need for a strong response to the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. CIA Director Haspel should brief the full Senate without delay," Schumer said in a statement.

HEY STEVE, did you overlook this question: WHY do trump side with The Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman instead of his very own CIA director Gina Haspel?

Now, If that is what Chuck Schumer said then I agree with his statement 100% as well.

I didn't overlook your question Ron. I'm not the President and I would not presume to know why he's not convinced by the CIA.

You are not concern about why he's not convinced by the CIA. I don't see why you are not concern because it is the task for these different U.S. government agencies to keep the president informed about current events around the world.

Don't you want the best information possible for the President of The United States of America? or do you want Trump to be a laughing stock, figure of fun, object of ridicule, a dupe, a butt of the joke around the world, a fool, everybody's fool, a stooge, everybody's target fool, a victim of Jokes and the fall guy of oligarchs, is that what you want to see Steve?

Don't you want the best for Trump?

I want the disrespect of the Presidency to stop Ron. You are ensuring that will never happen, you are permanently DEFORMING America.

Don't you want the best information possible for the President of The United States of America? or do you want Trump to be a laughing stock, figure of fun, object of ridicule, a dupe, a butt of the joke around the world, a fool, everybody's fool, a stooge, everybody's target fool, a victim of Jokes and the fall guy of oligarchs, is that what you want to see Steve?

YOUR WORDS: I want the disrespect of the Presidency to stop Ron.

MY REPLY: I want all Americans to be informed about who is in The White House, at is the right of all Americans unless you support taking that away from the people. Is that what you want to see happen Steve?

YOUR WORDS: You are ensuring that will never happen, you are permanently DEFORMING America.

MY REPLY: Steve, don't you understand, that in this country, we have a FREE PRESS and that too is their to keep the American people informed about current events. Steve, do you want to STOP THE FREE PRESS?

When Maureen Dowd disrespects and says only that George H.W. is a President and the other is "the current occupant" I have no use for your press.

That is her opinion and we in America have the right and the Freedom to express that opinion and I will not apologize for that freedom.

And you won't apologize for permanently deforming America. That is obvious Ron.

History will repeat itself as it has countless times before. Don't worry about it Ron, you're just a mindless cog in the wheel.

YOUR WORDS: You are ensuring that will never happen, you are permanently DEFORMING America.

MY REPLY: Steve, don't you understand, that in this country, we have a FREE PRESS and that too is their to keep the American people informed about current events.


Steve, do you want to "STOP THE FREE PRESS?"

No Ron, I have no desire to STOP THE FREE PROPAGANDISTS. My FREE OBSERVATION is that YOU are permanently deforming America.

It has a lot to do with your FREE RELIGIOUS DELUSION, wherewith you claim FREE MORAL SUPREMACY.

You are throwing throwing BULL💩 on the wall, just to see if it will stick. I am not THE BREAKING NEWS Steve. Trump did not want his very own CIA director Gina Haspel because he did not want the FACTS to come out.

Why don't you want that NEWS, Known by the American people?

You were the one that brought up the press Ron.

"Steve, don't you understand, that in this country, we have a FREE PRESS and that too is their to keep the American people informed about current events."

YOUR PRESS Ron, MSNBC, is not THERE to keep the people informed. If Maureen Dowd were there to inform, she would not refer to the President as "the current occupant of the White House" while gushing all over the formerly maligned DEAD PRESIDENT.

THAT IS THE BULLPOOP PLASTERED ALL OVER THE WALLS OF MSNBC'S STUDIOS.

In your last statement is a clear example of your way to misdirect the subject. Let us get back to the topic at hand. Trump wanting to suppress his very own CIA director Gina Haspel from informing the Senet about what she heard on those tapes of the brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

Hey STEVIE, Did you agree with Trump in his efforts to suppress that information about brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi?

WOW!!!

Trump didn't suppress the information on Khashoggi. The Senate has all the information they need, now let's see what they do with it. My prediction is NOTHING.

No, what Trump did was to try in stop CIA director Gina Haspel from briefing the Senate but he failed in that effort BADLY.

Hey STEVIE, Did you agree with Trump in his efforts to suppress that information about brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi?

Your question is moot Ron. Nothing was suppressed.

My question stands STRONG; Did you agree with Trump in his efforts to suppress that information about brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi?

Ron, there's no way for me to answer your question because it's predicated on something I don't believe. I will now leave you to your belief.

You see the reaction to Trump’s failure to suppress the efforts of his CIA director. I pray that you will take the blinders off your own eyes, that blinds you to the FACTS and the courage to admit your failures to see the LIES of Trump.

I pray for you to open up your eyes so you will no longer be blind on this issue.