Mueller's Cohen filing points to Trump's role in criminal scheme

We now know the reason why Cohen LIED.

1. To minimize links between the Moscow Project and individual #1. I will get into individual #1 that later.

2 To give a false impression that the "Moscow Project" had ended before the Iowa caucus and the first presidential primaries in hopes of limiting the ongoing Russia investigation being conducted by Congress and The SCO.

BREAKING NEWS...

The impeachment proceedings against the President will mean nothing else gets done for 2 years, and will ensure Donald Trump is reelected in 2020. Have at it Ron.

Did you see this report Stevie? You can put that speculation on the bottom shelf for now. We are talking about "Mueller’s Cohen filing points to Trump’s role in criminal scheme."

I know that you have not read the memos Ron. Now what does this mean?

During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. (PSR ¶ 51). In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. (PSR ¶¶ 41, 45). As a result of Cohen’s actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election. (PSR ¶ 51).

YOUR STATEMENT AND QUESTION: I know that you have not read the memos Ron. Now what does this mean?

HERE IS MY ANSWER: Trump never did think that he was going to win the presidency to The United States Of America but when it did start to look like he may have a chance to win, Trump did not want his erot*c escapades to hinder his chances of winning at the last moment. So he sent his main fixer to fix that matter and we all found out after the election, what happen, now didn't we!

Who do you think the reference to "INDIVIDUAL-1 Is STEVE? it is right there in front of you, in your reply, who is he STEVE?

Who do you think the reference to "INDIVIDUAL-1 Is STEVE? it is right there in front of you, in your LAST reply, who is he STEVE?

Who do you think the reference to "INDIVIDUAL-1 Is STEVE? it is right there in front of you, in your LAST reply, who is he STEVE?

That's not the question Ron. The question is, HAS THE SDNY INDICTED TRUMP? Yes or no?

Didn't you asked me to tell you what that paragraph meant STEVIE? "INDIVIDUAL-1 is what you brought to this conversation.

Now I asked you Who do you think the reference to "INDIVIDUAL-1 Is STEVE? it is right there in front of you, in your LAST reply, who is he STEVE and now you want to run from my question.

NO!!! My question stands: "Who do you think the reference to "INDIVIDUAL-1 Is STEVE? it is right there in front of you, in your LAST reply, who is he STEVE? "

There is a long standing Justice Department ruling that a sitting President can't be indicted. But SDNY tried to skirt that rule AND YOU PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE TRUMP HAS BEEN INDICTED. Don't be a ***** Ron, explain why you think President Trump has been indicted.

ANSWER TO YOUR STATEMENT: Not yet Steve, Not yet and stop putting words in my mouth.

MY QUESTION TO YOU: Didn't you asked me to tell you what that paragraph meant STEVIE? "INDIVIDUAL-1 is what you brought to this conversation.

Now I asked you Who do you think the reference to "INDIVIDUAL-1 Is STEVE? it is right there in front of you, in your LAST reply, who is he STEVE and now you want to run from my question.

NO!!! My question stands: "Who do you think the reference to "INDIVIDUAL-1 Is STEVE? it is right there in front of you, in your LAST reply, who is he STEVE? "