Ilhan Omar DEMOLISHES Republican Haters

Ilhan Omar is striking back against Alabama Republicans trying to remove her from office. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, hosts of The Young Turks, break it down.

Are you concerned about Rep. Omar Ron?

Yes? Because it is plain to see that she is being LIED on. Did you see this report Steve?

Ron, then why are you blocking her one and only BIA family member? The one person who is qualified to comment?

Can you see that Ilhan Omar Is being lied 🤥 on Steve?

I don't think Omar is anti-semitic, do you Ron?

Why can’t you answer my simple question to you Steve? Can you see that Ilhan Omar Is being lied 🤥 on Steve?

I asked first Ron. Why do you block Robert on the subject of Ilhan Omar?

And yes, I watched your video.

Blocking her so-called one and only BIA family member has nothing to do with this blog topic Steve. Now since you said you watch this video report, do you think what Rep. Ilhan Omar comments Was Disloyal to the United States of America as the Alabama GOP say?

No Ron, I don't think what Rep. Ilhan Omar comments Was Disloyal to the United States of America as the Alabama GOP say.

Ron, do you favor a one-state solution as Omar does?

Thank You Steve, we agree that Rep. Ilhan Omar comments Was "NOT" Disloyal to the United States of America as the Alabama GOP say?

I love what she said in resposne to The Alabama GOP.: "She Said, sorry, Alabama GOP, but this is a representative democracy. I was elected with 78% of the vote by the people of Minnesota's 5th district, not the Alabama Republican Party. if you want to clean up politics, maybedon't nominate an accused child molester as your Senate candidate. "BOOM" I loved that comeback. For me that was a drop the mic moment, LOL!!!

Steve, what do you call a one-state solution? As I review this topic, I did not see that Rep. Ilhan Omar commented one a one-state solution.

I misspoke Ron. I'd still like to know your position.

Depending on various points of view, a one-state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is presented as a situation in which Israel would ostensibly lose its character as a Jewish state and the Palestinians would fail to achieve their national independence within a two-state solution[5] or, alternatively, as the best, most just, and only way to resolve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.

Although the terms "One-State Solution" and "bi-national solution" are often used synonymously, they do not necessarily mean the same thing. In debates about a one-state solution in Israel-Palestine, bi-nationalism refers to a political system in which the two groups, Jews and Palestinians, would retain their legal and political character as separate nations or nationalities, perhaps similar to the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechoslovakia. In most bi-national arguments for a one-state solution, such an arrangement is deemed necessary both to ensure the protection of minorities (whichever group that is) and to reassure both groups that their collective interests would be protected. Counter-arguments are that bi-nationalism would entrench the two identities politically in ways that would foster their continuing rivalry and social divides; these arguments favour a unitary democratic state, or one-person-one-vote arrangement.[citation needed]

Support for a one-state solution is increasing as Palestinians, frustrated by lack of progress in negotiations aiming to establish the two-state solution, increasingly see the one-state solution as an alternative way forward.[9][10] In April 2016, U.S. Vice President Biden said that because of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's policy of steady expansion of settlements, an eventual "one-state reality" with Israeli Jews no longer in the majority was the likely outcome.[11]

Steve, sense you said that you misspoke, I will accept your error and I will concider your question as a side NOTE and not apart of this blog subject.

Steve, according to this definition, you gave of a two state solution, I see,it is a problem but what I do know is, we here in the U.S. have a democratic state, or I shold saya one-person-one-vote arrangement that combins all 50 states into ONE. Now if you call that a "One-State Solution" where as all the people in Israel are treated equal, then I agree of a one vote rule according to this definition, I am all for it.

Some would say that taking that position makes you anti-semitic Ron.

From what I can see of the definition of Antisemitism or being anti-semitic is being hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews. A person who holds such positions is called an antisemite. Antisemitism is generally considered to be a form of racism. It has also been characterized as a political ideology which serves as an organizing principle and unites disparate groups which are opposed to liberalism.

How can having everyone in Israel, which is a democratic state, having one vote, fit the definition of being anti-semitic or being hostility to or being prejudice, or discrimination against Jews?

Now in the history of this country discrimination against Black People did not included the the right to one-person-one-vote as well. That would be my argument to Some would say that taking that position makes me NOT a anti-semitic person.

Ron, the Israelis are ethno-nationalists. Many think a one-state solution would destroy their Jewish identity.

Some people in this country is saying, That is the same arugment that the White Supremacy Groups in this are saying about their White Idenity. OK!

As long as we're off subject Ron, let's talk about why you've censored Robert's comments on his family member you've appropriated as your own subject.

NO!!! We will get back to the topic.