Trump Impeachment Inquiry Banks Evidence As Witnesses Testify | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

Nancy has been lying to us. She won't take a vote because SHE DOESN'T HAVE THE VOTES.

That is BULL💩 and you know it, Steve. Nancy, can stop a filibuster from coming to the floor By The Republicans with the votes she have.

Open your 👏🏽👀’s Steve.

Ron, Nancy doesn't have the votes to begin an impeachment inquiry. That's the outcome of her caucus meeting yesterday.

Tell me something Steve, is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?

It's in the Constitution Ron, "The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

I know that Steve.

I asked you this: "is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?

Nancy should have done just what was done every other time (all THREE times) the House began impeachment of a President. She should have called a full vote of the House. What she is doing right now is illegal.

BULL💩 Steve, Trump was having a melt down while The House of Representatives played him like a fiddle.

Now you are learning who Trump is.

Steve, this question is: ."Is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?"

I answered your question Ron. Don't worry, it will all backfire on you.

You did not answer this question Steve:

"Is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?"

If this is your so call answer: Nancy should have done just what was done every other time (all THREE times) the House began impeachment of a President. She should have called a full vote of the House. What she is doing right now is illegal.

Point to the law that Speaker of The House of Representatives is in violation of Steve?

When I point you to the law Ron it doesn't matter. Pelosi is continuing her charade and when she's done the American people will make their judgement.

Try me, point me to that LAW Steve? I hope that you are using The Constitution of the United States of America as a law reference.

"The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Or does it say?

"The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and the Speaker shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

impeach (v.)
formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder, stop, impede; capture, trap, ensnare" (12c., Modern French empêcher), from Late Latin impedicare "to fetter, catch, entangle," from assimilated form of in- "into, in" (from PIE root *en "in") + Latin pedica "a shackle, fetter," from pes (genitive pedis) "foot" (from PIE root *ped- "foot").

This BULL💩 Steve, this is not from The Constitution of the United States of America and you to that to be a FACT. This was a FOOL MOVE to try and prove a LIE.

Steve, you got this definition right out of the book of etymonline, a online dictionary. Steve, I know you can do better this? Ha,Ha, AH!!! LOL

Steve, once again, you have come to the strongest people, with the weakest of BULL💩.

Now quote from The Constitution of the United States of America as your law reference point, to find that that LAW that you are talking about, can you do that Steve?

Ron, Nancy Pelosi has usurped the power of the House and taken it upon herself to impeach the President. That's a violation of her Oath of Office.

Just what I thought and I could have perdidted this out come or I should say this BULL💩 of yours Steve becasue it was plain as day. (LOL) So, you can't use The Constitution of the United States of America to prove your case, now can you?

"Is it against The Law that say, Nancy must hold a vote at this point while information about this case is strongly roaring in about Ttump?"

Steve, so this is a LIE to, this is not from The Constitution of the United States of America as your law reference point, to find that that LAW that you are talking about, I am correct?

impeach (v.)
formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder, stop, impede; capture, trap, ensnare" (12c., Modern French empêcher), from Late Latin impedicare "to fetter, catch, entangle," from assimilated form of in- "into, in" (from PIE root *en "in") + Latin pedica "a shackle, fetter," from pes (genitive pedis) "foot" (from PIE root *ped- "foot").

Thursday, October 17th 2019 at 7:25PM
Steve Williams | delete | block member

Ron, do you understand that the Democrat's are all on their own impeaching the President?