Republicans smear and slander ahead of testimony

That fool Vindman just got applauded.

What do you disagree with, to why Vindman got those applause Steve?

Vindman got a round of applause from some in the audience during an exchange with Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-N.Y.

Maloney asked Vindman how he could be confident in telling his father not to worry about raising alarms about Trump's conduct.

"This is America," Vindman said. "This is the country I've served and defended. That all of my brothers have served. And here, right matters."

Steve, what part of Vindman statement that you disagree with?

What I just posted Ron. That exchange between Maloney and Vindman. In particular where Vindman claims "And here, right matters."

So, you object to the way Vindman gave praise to his Father for making the right choice to take his family out of The Soviet Union to come to The United States of America, where Vindman have faith that he can do the right thing, without the fear of death by serving the country that he love's .

Steve, you and your family came to this country seeking FREEDOM too, didn't you?

How many years did you pay back in service to the United States of America as a immigrant?

United States Army lieutenant colonel Alexander Vindman did 20 years of Service to this country and how many years did you serve?

Ron, none of that has anything to do with usurping from the President his authority to govern, the authority that 63 million Americans gave to Trump not this Ukrainian wacko.

National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman is creditable witness and this is what Vindman said: Vindman told his dad not to worry about possible backlash from his testimony, prompting Maloney to ask how he overcame his fear of reprisal.

"Congressman, because this is America. This is the country I have served and defended, that all of my brothers have served. And here, right matters," Vindman answered.

"Dad, my sitting here today in the U.S. Capitol talking to our elected officials, is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to the United States of America in search of a better life for our family," Vindman's earlier statement said. "Do not worry — I'll be fine for telling the truth."
IMPEACHMENT WITNESS SCOLDS NUNES FOR CALLING HIM MISTER: 'LT. COL. VINDMAN, PLEASE'

What was your disagreement again?

Steve, you and your family came to this country seeking FREEDOM too, didn't you?

How many years did you pay back in service to the United States of America as a immigrant?

United States Army lieutenant colonel Alexander Vindman did 20 years of Service to this country and how many years did you serve?

Ron, I said Vindman is a Ukrainian wack job. They offered him a foreign title even.

National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman said "NO!!!"

National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman said "NO!!!"

What part of National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman that you don't like Steve, was it this?

Vindman told his dad not to worry about possible backlash from his testimony, prompting Maloney to ask how he overcame his fear of reprisal.

"Congressman, because this is America. This is the country I have served and defended, that all of my brothers have served. And here, right matters," Vindman answered.

Or was it this?"

"Dad, my sitting here today in the U.S. Capitol talking to our elected officials, is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to the United States of America in search of a better life for our family," Vindman's earlier statement said. "Do not worry — I'll be fine for telling the truth."

Steve, what part of Vindman statement that you disagree with?

It wasn't either of those things Ron. I don't like Vindman's attitude. I can see why Tim Morrison didn't trust him.

Morrison’s lawyer stopped Morrison from giving an in-depth response over the concerns that the other officials had about Vindman.

Morrison later confirmed that multiple other officials were concerned that Vindman was potentially leaking sensitive information to the media.

Morrison also confirmed that Vindman did not keep him in the loop about all the things that he was doing in the job and that Vindman went behind his back and did not inform him about the concerns that he had about President Donald Trump’s July 25 phone call with the president of Ukraine.

“If he had concerns about something about the content of the call, that’s something that I expected that I would have been notified of,” Morrison said. “I also think as a matter of practice, since we both went to the lawyers, we didn’t both need to.”

“At any point subsequently, did [Vindman] become frustrated that he felt cut out of some of the Ukraine portfolio?” Castor asked.

“Yes,” Morrison responded, adding that Vindman was upset that he was not invited on a trip to Ukraine.

We call his type a prima donna.

Are these your words Steve?

Vindman got a round of applause from some in the audience during an exchange with Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-N.Y.

Maloney asked Vindman how he could be confident in telling his father not to worry about raising alarms about Trump's conduct.

"This is America," Vindman said. "This is the country I've served and defended. That all of my brothers have served. And here, right matters."


Tuesday, November 19th 2019 at 6:22PM
Steve Williams | delete | block member

This is what you was talking about Steve.

STOP RUNNING and answer the question.

If right mattered Ron, Vindman would have stuck with something he was qualified for. No wonder he's only a lieutenant colonel.

The question is:

Are these your words Steve?

Vindman got a round of applause from some in the audience during an exchange with Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, D-N.Y.

Maloney asked Vindman how he could be confident in telling his father not to worry about raising alarms about Trump's conduct.

"This is America," Vindman said. "This is the country I've served and defended. That all of my brothers have served. And here, right matters."


Tuesday, November 19th 2019 at 6:22PM
Steve Williams | delete | block member

This is what you was talking about Steve?

Because I know you was not talking about National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman rank.

Sure Ron, but why are you going backwards?

To be clear, yes I object to his words "to" his father. I strongly object Ron.

Why Steve?

"This is America," Vindman said. "This is the country I've served and defended. That all of my brothers have served. And here, right matters."

Do you strongly object to this Steve: "This is America?"

or this, ""This is the country I've served and defended?"

or maybe this: "That all of my brothers have served?"

How about this: "And here, right matters?"

Steve, which part of National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman statement that you strongly object too Steve?

Why Ron? Because it doesn't have a damn thing to do with Presidential authority. We don't care about Vindman's deceased father or his military title or his dress uniform.

There is nothing in my questions to you about addressing Vindman's deceased father but this is National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman statement for the love for his country, do you strongly object with that?

You complain about National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman military title. Since you no little to nothing about The Military Chain of Command, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman did it the old fashion way, he earned it.

Now, what you strongly object to, when it comes to National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman again?

Or was it this?"

"Dad, my sitting here today in the U.S. Capitol talking to our elected officials, is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to the United States of America in search of a better life for our family," Vindman's earlier statement said. "Do not worry — I'll be fine for telling the truth."

YES RON, THAT'S IT, THAT'S WHAT I STRONGLY OBJECT TO.

What is it exactly that You STRONGLY OBJECT TO, is that National Security Council official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman tells his Father, that he did the right thing by bringing his family to The United States of America some 40 years ago, where telling the Truth is a honorable thing to do?

What are you exactly STRONGLY OBJECT TO.?

Not only is Vindman's father deceased, not only is it SILLY to speak to one's deceased father, who is past hearing, to speak to him in front of the world but in addition, Vindman's family storytelling has absolutely NOTHING to do with his traitorous attempt to bring down the President of the United States. THAT'S what I strongly object to Ron.

For telling The American people the truth in the case, is that what you object to, Steve?

For being irrelevant Ron. Vindman was being completely irrelevant.

To which I observe you have no answer Ron.

Steve, NO ANSWER TO WHAT?

STEVE YOUR WORDS: For being irrelevant Ron. Vindman was being completely irrelevant.

Don't you understand that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, is the top Ukraine "EXPERT" in the room on the National Security Council, that was the reason why Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman has that U.S. Government post in the first place?

How do you define Vindman was being completely irrelevant in those words that you posted, that was objecting too Steve?

You have no answer Ron, what was the relevance of Vindman's testimony?

You got to be kidding me right?

Steve, this is what has been shouted out loud and clearly and here's the part that Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, played with this investigation:

Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, is the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council Steve, he revealed in his testimony to Congress that he twice reported President Donald Trump’s pressure on Ukraine as a potential national security risk and said that key quotes referring to former Vice President Joe Biden and Burisma, the Ukrainian firm whose board included Biden’s son Hunter, were omitted from the partial transcript of Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Vindman also contradicted denials Perry made to the press about Biden.

In short Steve the relevance of Vindman's testimony was to set the record straight.

1. White House call summary is accurate

2. Vindman took concerns to NSC lawyer

3. Vindman’s testimony appears to conflict with Sondland’s claims

4. Vindman’s family fled the former Soviet Union

5. White House accused Vindman of ‘espionage’ against Trump

Steve, this is five things that I have came away with Steve, what did you get out Vindman's testimony?

You got to be kidding me right? Now you want even reply back, WOW!!!

What are you exactly STRONGLY OBJECT TO.?

1. Irrelevant - that was already known
2. His concerns were noted - no action taken
3. Neither Vindman's nor Sondland's testimony made a difference
4. Absolutely irrelevant!
5. FALSE