Christianity Today editor calls Trump's behavior 'blatantly' troublesome

"To the many evangelicals who continue to support Mr. trump in spite of his blackened moral record, we might say this: Remember who you are and whom you serve... Consider what an unbelieving world will say if you continue to brush off Mr. Trump's Immoral words and behavior in the cause of political expediency."

Mark Galli is very confused. The President is correct to suggest he learn how to read a transcript.

So, you think that Mark Galli is very confused, make your case, right here on this blog, in your very next reply, can you do that Steve?

"It's not like I have any personal animus against the president," Mark Galli told NPR. "But he does display characteristics that I think as a leader of a great nation like the United States are deeply problematic." -- Mark Galli

The editorial hit like a bombshell when it was published online Thursday with the headline "Trump should be removed from office," due to the prominence of the magazine and the fact that Trump has enjoyed consistent support from the majority of evangelicals during his time in office.

Mark Galli has judged the President guilty just like a good Democrat. That's my case Ron.

Steve, if that is your case and you would have brought this weak one liner to court, the judge would have thrown your ass out of there Court Room.

Because on your word, you said that Galli, who is the current editor in chief of The Evangelical Christian Magazine, "Christianity Today" is CONFUSED. Based on this evidence, you have no case.

Quick Question Steve, Did the President of The United States of America ask The President of Ukraine, for a favor though?

Did the President of The United States of America hold up such funding's to Ukraine, who is in a battle with Russia for dirt on the Biden's until Trump got BUSTED?

If you saw this video report, did Mark Galli sound confident in the words he chose to use, to express his conviction in his editorial on the subject Trump's conviction and his removal from office?

If Mark Galli were right Ron, Nancy wouldn't be playing hide-and-seek with her Impeachment votes. When all your theatre is over one man will be left standing and it won't be Mark Galli.

“Let’s grant this to the president: The Democrats have had it out for him from day one, and therefore nearly everything they do is under a cloud of partisan suspicion,” wrote chief editor Mark Galli. “But the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.”

Do you think that this statement of Mark Galli is accurate about Trump?

No Ron, the facts in this instance are not unambiguous. Do you know anything about Christianity Today?