Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Steve, do you understand what this article is saying to you?

It doesn't matter what Barr says. Giuliani has tons of evidence Ron. Today he showed survellannce video of Democrats pulling out sauitcases full of illegal ballots and counting them when they thought no one was looking. BUSTED! Want me to find it for you???

When the article starts this way we can be sure it's a biased reporter: "Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims..." Why baseless? That's what we call an outright lie.

Steve, do you understand what this article is saying to you?

I asked you a question Ron. Why baseless?

The question that I asked you Steve, is the question that brought you to this blog in the place and now you are running from me and that question? Steve, you give me to much power over you, Man!

You came up with this BULL💩 to avoid answer the question the first time:

"Today he showed survellannce video of Democrats pulling out sauitcases full of illegal ballots and counting them when they thought no one was looking. BUSTED! Want me to find it for you???"

You know for a fact that would pull this blog subject off topic. Steve, that dog won't hunt.

Disputing Trump, Barr says "NO" widespread election fraud

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Steve, do you understand what this article is saying to you?

The question I asked is "Why baseless?" That is the core of your propaganda Ron. Who the hell knows what's going on with Barr. It doesn't matter, because the lie you are pinning all your hopes on is simply to close your eyes to the massive evidence against you.

What are you talking about Steve? I know you are NOT talking about that BULL💩 Giuliani presented in court, are you?

Have you forgot already that his evidence has been thrown out of every state court that Trump contestant.

Are you still taken your MEDS?

Steve, do you understand what this article is saying to you?

Yes Ron, I understand your article. If you think Barr is on YOUR side, bully for you. I don't buy it.

Why Don’t you believe The Attorney General of The United States of America and Trumps hand picked man now?

Because, just based on the soundbites I've heard, Barr's interview with AP doesn't strike me as significant. It's pretty simple Ron, it just gives you something to talk about. Just like the talk about pardons, you people are dreaming of changing the Constitution, won't ever happen, just something to talk about. That's what you people get paid for.

Let us stay on this topic if you don't mind. Focus your attention NOT on the soundbites that you heard, I' am talking about this information in this written report that you just read.

Trump needs Barr but Barr looked for what Trump is talking but The Attorney General of The United States of America and The Federal Bureau of Investigation which is the domestic intelligence and security service of the United States and its principal federal law enforcement agency. Operating under the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Justice, the FBI is also a member of the U.S. Intelligence Community and reports to both the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence. A leading U.S. counter-terrorism, counterintelligence, and criminal investigative organization, the FBI has jurisdiction over violations of more than 200 categories of federal crimes, saw NOTHING.

So you want ME to believe your BULL💩 after these two top American investigative agencies looked at Giuliani so-called evidence and they said that they didn't see NOTHING.

Steve, maybe that experience you went through may be the proof Trump needs to overturn the election in Philadelphia.

THINK SO....



Steve, this is another case to prove my point, you can't prove a LIE.

I've never thought the words "you can't prove a LIE" were wortrh consideration either. Please tell me what practical difference Bill Barr's words to the "Associated Press" make Ron.

In Short, Bill Barr have not seen any evidence to support TRUMP'S LIES that he won the 2020 election.

So what? Have Barr's words changed anyone's actions Ron?

More and more each day Steve. That is why TRUMP is having a hard time proving his case of election fraud to the America people, when the word came from Trump's top hand picked head of this counties law enforcement agency.

Face it Steve, TRUMP is over as president.

Yoiu won by cheating Ron. You cheated on a massive scale never seen before. Millions of Americans experienced your cheating first hand, just as I did. There is unrest all across the country because of how we were all cheated. Lies like yours don't faze us Ron.

Where is your proof? Where is The Beef?

Before I go, I want to Thank You for hiring and keeping Rudy Giuliani on as Trump's Chief Attorney because that man has presented Trump case in those SIX contested states and The States Supreme Courts threw that 💩 OUT and you went into denial, even after you saw the FACTS.

Barr’s comments, in an interview with The Associated Press, contradict the concerted effort by Trump, his boss, to subvert the results of last month’s voting and block President-elect Joe Biden from taking his place in the White House.

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

This happens right before your eyes. Now with that said, do you see any involvement by me in that statement?



I didn't have to cheat when I have presented the FACT and you keep running like a rat when I turn on the light.

Barr probably couldn't get his underlings to do as they were told. The U.S. attorneys and FBI agents must have all been radicalized.

This happens right before your eyes. Now with that said, do you see any involvement by me in that statement?

It happened and it's insignificant. The FBI can't be trusted, not the U.S. Attorneys.

Only the legislatures can save us, or the U.S. Supreme Court. It's likely though they won't have the courage to step up and America will continue her descent into darkness. China will soon rule us. Their bio-engineered virus looks like a winner.

This happens right before your eyes. Now with that said, do you see any involvement by me in that statement?

The answer is "NO!!!" How low will you go running from that FACT that Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Ron, how do you know "these two top American investigative agencies looked at Giuliani so-called evidence and they said that they didn't see NOTHING."

Because Bill Barr is a top supporter and confidant of Trump's but in this case, Bill has a line, that he will not cross and now you have seen it.

How do you know the FBI investigated Giuliani's evidence of election fraud? How do you know that Ron?

I know that you are a little slow so, I will post my answer again. Steve, this is where I got my information from, which is a very credible source for current news of the day.

Barr’s comments, in an interview with The Associated Press, contradict the concerted effort by Trump, his boss, to subvert the results of last month’s voting and block President-elect Joe Biden from taking his place in the White House.

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

“...working to follow up specific complaints..." Which complaints were those Ron? Were they Giuliani's complaints? Giuliani said no, they were not. He said the FBI was "nowhere to be found."

Then where is Giuliani proof? Because Barr said he nor FBI have "NOT" see any proof yet.

Now Steve, if you got The AG of The United States on your side, don't you think you would use the advantages you have on your side, to prove you case, Steve?

Then where is Giuliani's proof? Because Barr said he nor FBI have "NOT" seen any proof yet.

Now Steve, if you got The AG of The United States on your side, don't you think you would use the advantages you have on your side, to prove your case, Steve?

Well, Giuliani has these advantages and he can't prove his way out of a wet paper bag, right now.

The FBI is AWOL. It goes way back Ron. You do know that there was no predicate for Crossfire Hurricane. Those guys are either violating someone's civil rights or when they're needed like now, they're nowhere to be found.

Now Steve, if you got The AG of The United States on your side, don't you think you would use the advantages you have on your side, to prove your case if you have ONE, Steve?

Keep in mind all of this is happening on TRUMP'S watch.

That"s the point Ron. Chris Wray and his underlings have chosen to ignore their boss. It's called mutiny.

NO!!! Steve, they are following the LAW and not Trump, that is "NOT" mutiny.

Trump has not shown any creditable proof yet, have you see any of Trump's proof that he can go to court with yet?

Barr’s comments, in an interview with the The Associated Press, contradict the concerted effort by Trump, his boss, to subvert the results of last month’s voting and block President-elect Joe Biden from taking his place in the White House.

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

China is calling the shots Ron. They are bigger than Barr, bigger than Trump, and bigger than Biden. Biden is a puppet in their hands, just like you Ron.

Damn China Steve because that is not the answer to the question that I just asked you.

Trump has not shown any creditable proof yet, have you see any of Trump's proof that he can go to court with yet?

We're expecting that maybe as early as today we will hear if the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Rep. Mike Kelly's suit.

NEWS FLASH Steve, did you see this news?

Legal experts dismissed Paxton's filing as the latest and perhaps longest legal shot since Election Day, and officials in the four states sharply criticized Paxton. “I feel sorry for Texans that their tax dollars are being wasted on such a genuinely embarrassing lawsuit,” Wisconsin's attorney general, Josh Kaul, said.

The Supreme Court, without comment Tuesday, refused to call into question the certification process in Pennsylvania. Gov. Tom Wolf, D-Pa., already has certified Biden’s victory and the state’s 20 electors are to meet on Dec. 14 to cast their votes for the former vice president.

More:Texas attorney general asks Supreme Court to block Biden victory in 4 states

"The merits are so outrageous in these claims that even the most avid Trump judges on the federal bench are laughing them out of court," says Rebecca Green, co-director of the election law program at William & Mary Law School. "I don’t see any reason why his judges on the Supreme Court wouldn’t be forced into that same position.”

"The Supreme Court is not going to somehow swoop in at the midnight hour, declare the entire legal system to have been wrong about all this, and throw the election into chaos."

In Short, what you are witnessing right now is Trump's attempt to present proof to his allegations of fraud, to overturn the election for him without any proof, do you think he will win his case?

Mike Kelly lost his case so now all our hope rests on the Texas case.

In Short, what you are witnessing right now is Trump's attempt to present proof to his allegations of fraud, to overturn the election for him without any proof, do you think he will win his case at The Supreme Court level?