Merrick Garland just called Donald Trump’s bluff Chris Cillizza Analysis by Chris Cillizza,

Merrick Garland just called Donald Trump’s bluff Chris Cillizza Analysis by Chris Cillizza

SUBJECT

".. struck back – albeit in the limited way.."

Chris Cillizza

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray
Thursday, August 11th 2022 at 5:50PM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

********************************************************************************************************************************

The Great President Barack Hussein Obama nominated this guy for Supreme Court...?

..No wonder he nor oldJoe fought for America about this dork..

..hate billBarr, like joe..BUT this turkey smells bad..WEAK USA ATTORNEY..HEAD of LAW in USA...

Merrick Garland will bring TRUMP to Justice.

Trump just called Garlands bluff, told him to go ahead and unseal the warrant. Garland's got nothing but a big fat nothing-burger.

"Not only will I not oppose the release of documents related to the unAmerican, unwarranted, and unnecessary raid and break-in of my home in Palm Beach, Florida, Mar-a-Lago, I am going a step further by ENCOURAGING the immediate release of those documents, even though they have been drawn up by radical left Democrats and possible future political opponents, who have a strong and powerful vested interest in attacking me, much as they have done for the last 6 years…"

"…My poll numbers are the strongest they have ever been, fundraising by the Republican Party is breaking all records, and midterm elections are fast approaching. This unprecedented political weaponization of law enforcement is inappropriate and highly unethical. The world is watching as our Country is being brought to a new low, not only on our border, crime, economy, energy, national security, and so much more, but also with respect to our sacred elections!

Release the documents now!"

Nuclear weapons issue is a Hoax, just like Russia, Russia, Russia was a Hoax, two Impeachments were a Hoax, the Mueller investigation was a Hoax, and much more. Same sleazy people involved. Why wouldn’t the FBI allow the inspection of areas at Mar-a-Lago with our lawyer’s, or others, present. Made them wait outside in the heat, wouldn’t let them get even close - said “ABSOLUTELY NOT.” Planting information anyone? Reminds me of a Christofer Steele Dossier!

This is what happens when you don’t answer a subpoena In defy the courts. It was Trump who told the Courts to take the next step by ignoring the summons. No man is above the law.

Steve, would you define the courts?

Why would trump want to keep highly classified top secret US documents at Miralago in Florida?

That is one question that I am looking for to be answered.

Ron, Trump didn't ignore the subpoena. The documents were all declassified, by a standing order of President Trump, in compliance with Executive Orders signed by George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Number one, it was all declassified. Number two, they didn’t need to “seize” anything. They could have had it anytime they wanted without playing politics and breaking into Mar-a-Lago. It was in secured storage, with an additional lock put on as per their request...
…They could have had it anytime they wanted—and that includes LONG ago. ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS ASK. The bigger problem is, what are they going to do with the 33 million pages of documents, many of which are classified, that President Obama took to Chicago?

It's true that Obama White House records made their way to Chicago at the end of his second term. But the process of transferring the documents was done in cooperation with the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), which legally owns those records under the Presidential Records Act.

The 1978 law declares presidential and vice-presidential records property of the federal government, with the NARA responsible for the "custody, control and preservation" of the materials once a presidential administration ends.

Rather than store the Obama records in a physical presidential library owned by the NARA as many of his predecessors have done, the Obama Foundation worked with the agency to digitize unclassified records.

Touted as a "new partnership for the digital age," the digitization process was outlined in an agreement between the National Archives and the Obama Foundation.

"The Parties agree that the Digitization Project will at all times be performed in accordance with the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA) and other applicable federal law, and for the purpose of making the records more accessible to historians and the public pursuant to that Act," reads the agreement, which also explicitly states that the National Archives owns the Obama records and that they're held at a Chicago-area facility controlled by the agency.

There is no evidence that Obama or his foundation did anything illegal in handling his presidential records, as NARA clarified in a statement released to PEOPLE Friday.

STEVE READ MORE Fact Check: Did Barack Obama Illegally Take 30 Million Pages of Documents to Chicago? https://people.com/politics/fact-check-did...

I can back up what I said is THE FACTS AND JUST THE FACTS.

It's true Ron, Obama is a perfect example, a poster man, of the Establishment. Folks love it.

Obama is a perfect example on how to work with The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), which legally owns those records under the Presidential Records Act and not the way TRUMP did it.

Steve, why is Top Secret material setting in a room at Mar- A - largo in the first place?