‘That’s a Ridiculous Question’: Karine Jean-Pierre Rejects Doocy For Asking If Biden Considers GOP Voters a ‘T

Biden said Republicans ARE a threat to democracy.

“No,” replied Jean-Pierre. “That’s a ridiculous question, no.”

Karine is incorrect Ron. Biden said if we vote Republican we're voting AGAINST DEMOCRACY. I'm a threat to democracy because I'm voting for Mastriano. Ask Biden Ron, don't ask that ditsy broad KJP.

Where is your proof of what you say, Steve?

Steve this is Jean-Pierre answered:

Because the American people should have their right to vote for whomever they want. The voting is a sacred right. It is something that the president wants to protect at every turn and he has done that. He’s taken actions to protect the right to vote. And you see Democrats in Congress also doing the work to protect the right to vote.

Now, let's take a look at what she said and tell me what part of what White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, that's incorrect, can you do that on your next reply?

What's incorrect Ron is that far from Biden protecting the right to vote, he betrayed the right to vote and stole the 2020 election. Well on November 8 we're going to **** him up.

More of your BULL💩 Steve? Where is your proof that Biden stole the 2020 election? I see that you pulled this stolen 2020 presidential election? Steve, you can’t find any evidence that Biden stole The 2020 election because it never happened.

You still believe in “THE BIG LIE” because you are weak, scared, delicate and not to bright. For example, how did Biden steal the 2020 presidential election?

What happened to that argument in over 60 courts, here in the United States?

Steve, I’m predicting your as- will run from those questions, like a person on FIRE, just watch you run.

The PA Supreme Court has determined that in the 2020 election, mail-in ballots that were not dated shouldn't have been counted. But they didn't determine that in 2020, they determined it this year. That's how the 2020 election was stolen Ron.

I believe I read something to that order where there was a report PA Supreme Court rules incorrectly marked mail-in ballots won’t count in the election by somebody named: " by Constitutional Nobody " Let me see if I can find that article.

PA Supreme Court rules incorrectly marked mail-in ballots won’t count in the election https://ussanews.com/2022/11/02/pa-supreme...

Now would you trust this article written by Constitutional Nobody, Steve?

This is a good topic to talk about and open to anyone here on "Black In America" join the conversation.

The article is correct Ron. This election, mail-in ballots without a date won't be counted. There is some minimum effort required to cast a vote in Pennsylvania and that includes putting the date with one's signature.

So you will believe a character named Constitutional Nobody, WOW!!!

This character said what I already knew Ron.

If you believe this is the kind of IGNORANT BULL💩, Steve I got a bridge in Philadelphia to sell you. WOW!!!

Earlier this week, Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court deadlocked over whether rejecting such undated or incorrectly dated mail-in ballots violates federal civil rights law because the date is a technicality that doesn’t speak to the eligibility of the voter. On Tuesday, the court ruled counties should not count undated or incorrectly dated mail-in ballots but must segregate and retain them, a strong signal that even the state’s highest court suspects the issue is not settled.

The order to segregate the ballots “sort of portends there might be further litigation and [the state Supreme Court justices] know it,” retired federal Judge John E. Jones said in a press briefing this week hosted by Keep Our Republic, a nonprofit group.

https://www.inquirer.com/news/pennsylvania...

Attorneys for the Republicans in the case argued that the General Assembly’s meaning “could not have been clearer” when it passed a state law saying voters “shall…fill out, date and sign the declaration” printed on their ballot’s outer envelope, and that there’s no good reason for the court to rule differently.

They also wrote that the dates are materially useful in determining whether ballots should be accepted, and invoked a controversial argument, known as the “independent state legislature” doctrine. It posits that state legislatures are the ultimate authority on election matters and that Pennsylvania’s executive and judicial branches don’t have any power to check a legislature’s decisions.

https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2022/11/p...

Yes Steve, did you know it was more disinformation and propaganda from a character named Constitutional Nobody.

You sound like you eat that BULL💩 up!!!

It sounds like you're trying to divide the African-American family at BIA Ron.

What I am doing Steve is showing you and the people here on Black In America, that you can't find any hard evidence to back up your BULL💩 that you claim, Steve. Now you want people to believe in a character named Constitutional Nobody. Steve, are you serious?

I quoted you the Philadelphia Inquirer and Spotlight PA, "an independent, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to high-quality investigative and public-service journalism about the Pennsylvania state government and urgent statewide issues, including elections, voting, the governor, the legislature, rural communities, criminal justice, economic development, health, human services, and more."

Ron, you were the one that quoted "a character named Constitutional Nobody."

Who is a Constitutional Nobody?

You are the one that quoted Constitutional Nobody. You tell me Ron who it is. At least now you see how mail-in voting was used to steal the 2020 Presidential election.

Steve, the only place your last comment can be found is, is in your head and that is the only place people can find that idiotic, lame, and untrue statement you made this day and this day is still early.

Where can I find your headline news at, on the internet? Can you tell me that in your next reply Steve?

I'll tell you on the other thread Ron.

No! We don't have to run to another thread Steve. I asked you a question and now you want to run all over hell to answer this question: Where can I find your headline news at, on the internet?

That was your next reply and you came up with that 💩, WOW Steve, you can't even explain yourself, for a grown as- man, WOW!!!

Check out these predictions made BEFORE the 2020 general election Ron:

In the 2020 general election, more Americans will vote by mail than ever before.
BY CHRIS TALGO, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 10/09/20 8:30 AM ET

Some states, such as California, have mailed so-called unsolicited ballots to all registered voters. Meanwhile, many others have expanded absentee ballot eligibility requirements.

One way or another, millions of Americans will vote via mail this fall, which could create a nightmare scenario in which the election outcome could be in flux weeks after Election Day.

There are many reasons why mail-in ballots are unreliable. One of the most significant is that mail-in ballots are often rejected.

In New York, which used mail-in ballots during its primary elections this spring, 21 percent of ballots were rejected because of errors.

In Pennsylvania, the same scenario played out, with more than 20 percent of mail-in ballots rejected due to voter error.

According to a recent NPR analysis, “An extraordinarily high number of ballots — more than 550,000 — have been rejected in this year’s presidential primaries … That’s far more than the 318,728 ballots rejected in the 2016 general election and has raised alarms about what might happen in November when tens of millions of more voters are expected to cast their ballots by mail, many for the first time.”

Making matters more ominous, NPR reports that these figures are likely an underestimate because many states have not yet reported their rejection numbers for primary elections.

Unbeknownst to many, mail-in voting is not as simple as it sounds. Each state has different rules when it comes to casting mail-in ballots. Some require multiple witnesses. Others require the ballot be notarized. For many voters, adhering to the labyrinth of instructions that accompany a mail-in ballot is just too difficult.

As the NPR analysis explains, “the rejection numbers are only part of the picture … they don’t always take into account mail-in ballots that are initially accepted but then not counted because of other mistakes, such as a voter incorrectly choosing too many candidates or incorrectly circling a candidate’s name instead of filling in the bubble next to it.”

In other words, even if a ballot is accepted initially, it can be rejected later for a host of reasons.

The outsized rejection rate for mail-in ballots could have massive implications, especially in battleground states. In many battleground states in the 2016 election, the margin of victory was razor thin.

For instance, in the 2016 election, four states were decided by less than a percentage point. In 2020, with massive mail-in voting, any state that is not a landslide for either candidate will likely be called into question due to mail-in vote counting concerns.

Moreover, this is likely to result in a series of lawsuits that call electoral returns into question.

“For their part, Democrats are pushing widespread mail-in voting but are also concerned that many of their voters’ ballots could be rejected if the rules aren’t relaxed,” reports NPR. “They’re in court in more than half the states fighting to extend mail-in ballot deadlines and to waive witness and notary requirements. They also want voters to be given the opportunity to fix errors before their ballots are rejected.”

This is a recipe for disaster. With the massive onslaught of mail-in ballots that will overwhelm local elected officials on Election Day and beyond, simply counting unrejected ballots will be a tall task.

Then the legal battle will ensue. Imagine a scenario in which we have no clear winner on or shortly after Election Day due to a myriad of lawsuits challenging rejected or unrejected mail-in ballots.

In 2000, it took more than a month before the Supreme Court finally declared the winner of one disputed state, Florida, by a five to four ruling in Bush v. Gore.

In 2020, we could have more than a score of states with disputed returns that would have to be decided ultimately by the Supreme Court.

And with the nomination of Amy Coney Barret still in flux, the ultimate worst-case-scenario could be a four to four tie.

Barring a landslide victory by either candidate on Election Day, the 2020 election could put the United States in dangerous waters.

As we have all witnessed, the country is already teeming with division and distrust. A disputed election due to mail-in voting malfeasance could be the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back.

In more than 230 years, the United States has never had an election result rejected by the people. But with a torrent of mail-in ballots that will throw a huge wrench into the validity of ballot counting, this could the first time that the United States experiences the crisis of a disputed election.

Chris Talgo (ctalgo@heartland.org) is an editor at The Heartland Institute.

Mail-in ballot rejection rate could cast doubt over election results
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/5...

This is some great information but none of it explains how the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from TRUMP because if mail-in Ballots are being rejected and those votes are NOT COUNTED and Trump still lost.

Consider the following paragraph Ron:

“For their part, Democrats are pushing widespread mail-in voting but are also concerned that many of their voters’ ballots could be rejected if the rules aren’t relaxed,” reports NPR. “They’re in court in more than half the states fighting to extend mail-in ballot deadlines and to waive witness and notary requirements. They also want voters to be given the opportunity to fix errors before their ballots are rejected.”

Remember, this was written before the election. In fact, the rules were relaxed, illegally. That's why you had a ridiculously low rate of ballots rejected, just 0.8 percent.

To this date Steve, you still have not made your case this The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. Show me the facts to why you think The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. This is something do have not done yet, why?

Ron, of the 81 million votes that Biden UNBELIEVABLY won (far surpassing the man who just eclipsed him on the 2022 campaign trail, that master of rhetoric, President Obama), many millions of those ballots for Biden should have been TOSSED. They would have been if the laws had been followed. But the laws weren't followed, COVID was given as the LAME excuse, and the executive officers unilaterally OVERTURNED the laws. That's how Biden won, it was a CHEAP shot, and half the country's citizens are still in rebellion. You should have respected us, instead you labelled us THE BIG LIE, and facists. 75 million of us true voters.

You say, many millions of those ballots for Biden should have been TOSSED if the LAWS were followed, what laws?

Are those laws you are talking about country-wide laws or are you talking about state laws Steve?

You say, many millions of those ballots for Biden should have been TOSSED if the LAWS were followed, what laws?

Are those laws you are talking about, are they country-wide laws or are you talking about state laws Steve?

State laws Ron.

The Elections Clause in Article I of the U.S. Constitution gives states the power to set the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections. According to a common interpretation, the clause allows states to create “rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results.”[3]

https://ballotpedia.org/Why_do_states_have...

A state-wide law, please. You know for a fact that elections are held nationwide and the elections law must be Federal a law governing all 50 states and not some local state voting law Steve.

To this date Steve, you still have not made your case this The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. Show me the facts to why you think The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. This is something do have not done yet, why?

I know for a fact you don't know what you're talking about Ron. Here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the mail-in vote is governed by a State law, Act 77, passed 2019.

With one purpose in mind and this to make it easier for everyone to vote. I understand that mail-in voting was developd by Republicans.

To this date Steve, you still have not made your case that The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. Show me the facts to why you think The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. This is something you have not done yet, why?

Same as with Arizona Ron, you're lying your ass off. You see the case perfectly. Mail-in voting is the bane of democracy.

Steve, I understand that mail-in voting was developed by Republicans.

Now let’s try again because I want to understand your way of thinking on the subject of Trump.

To this date Steve, you still have not made your case that The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. Show me the facts to why you think The 2020 Presidential Election was stolen from Donald J. Trump. This is something you have not done yet, why Steve?

Ron, you have no proof that the Democrats didn't support mail-in voting. I have proof to the contrary.