Not really a blog, more of a question or two . . .
Tony Boyd
·
Thursday, August 14th 2008 at 9:39AM
·
608 views
I was looking through the listings of possible groups to join and something struck me as a little strange. Here we are on a site, called BLACK in America, which is supposed to be our bastion in a sea of other people-ness (yes I know its not a word, just making a point), why would we find it necessary to name our groups "the BLACK this" or "the Black that"? Don't we already know the groups are or will be populated by Black people? Have we been conditioned by society at large to think that we have to identify ourselves as such so other races won't participate with us by mistake? Is it a sign to say, "this organization is for Blacks only"? Why would we need to be listed as "Black" leaders to one another? (Not singling anyone out, just trying to give an example.)
I realize the original usage of Black in front of organizational names signified that it was an organization for us, by us. It meant this was a place for us to come and be recognized for the skills and talents that were dismissed by the society at large. And it also meant that this was a place we could go to network freely. But does it not have the unenviable side effect (in the society at large) of having the connotation that you are not the BEST this or that but just the BLACK this or that (and even among ourselves)?
Back to my main point, is it really necessary in here?
Tony,
If you go to a German restaurant and the menu says “German Schnitzel or German Beer” is that necessary…you’re in a German restaurant. What about in a Jewish place of worship were things are labeled Jewish this or Jewish that…inside the Synagogue?
Humans have a belonging need. We use these “double titles” as a means of showing association. IHMO I don’t think they are meant to exclude others.
P.S. I’ve seen this doubling in many parts of the world…I don’t think this is just Black Folks.
Great Question!