All of the Mueller report’s major findings in less than 30 minutes

When special counsel Robert Mueller broke his silence in May, his main point was that his long-awaited report spoke for itself. But the report is 448 pages long. So Lisa Desjardins and William Brangham decided to dig into what the findings say – and what they don't. Here, in less than 30 minutes, are all of the most important points from the Mueller report.

Don't be lazy Ron. Take your time and read the details. It's all there right under your nose.

You know that I have a copy, now don't you Steve? However, I encourage all to look at this report of The Mueller Report.

So no collusion, no obstruction, no impeachment. That's great Ron. Thank you.

Can you show me and the people of Black In America where in this report that states no collusion and no obstruction, Steve?

You do remember this, don't you Steve: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30.000 email that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by the press. This was no JOKE, this is possible solicitation of a foreign government and be determined by the oversight committees.

Now Muller writes, with five hours of then candidate speaking those words, Russia targeted Clinton's personal office for the first time, according to this report.

Now the FBI, Department of Homeland Security and the states are still investigating.

One final Note about this part of the Russian section of this report is where you will see the most heavily redacted pages, much of it block out because of ongoing investigations.

President Trump is not under any indictment, sealed or otherwise, for any crime. Nor has he been impeached for any cause.

I asked you one direct question and that question is: Can you show me and the people of Black In America where in this report that states no collusion and no obstruction, Steve?

It's in there Ron, you'll find it one of these days.

So you can't answer that question I directly asked you now can you. here's that question again: "Can you show me and the people of Black In America where in this report that states no collusion and no obstruction, Steve?"

In this report Mueller notes that collusion is not a specific offense, that the actual crimes and Conspiracy or coordination. now in volume II of The Special Counsel investigated alleged obstruction of justice.

1. how did Mueller view President Trump firing of FBI Director James Comey, and what prompted Trump to take that step?

Did President Trump commit obstruction of Justice? That is that question that takes up the final roughly 200 pages of the Mueller Report.

Mueller said: If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.

We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime.

Now that conclusion, with no conclusion on whether the president is guilty or innocent, is where Mueller stars this part of the report.

he explains his lack of action by invoking an overriding question. Can a siting President be indicted?

I will stop here at 13 minutes and 10 seconds in this report for a moment.

The charge was ALWAYS collusion and that was what the President was exonerated of. No indictments were brought for anything else.

Did you see this report STEVEN, because that point was made clear as a bell that that collusion is not a specific offense, that the actual crimes and Conspiracy or coordination. now in volume II of The Special Counsel investigated alleged obstruction of justice.

We did not hear cries of "conspiracy" and "coordination" for 2 1/2 years Ron. The CONSTANT hue and cry during all that time, from Trump's inauguration to the release of Mueller's report was COLLUSION!

That came out of the mouth of Trump. Don't you see STEVEN, people have lost there freedom doing acts of Conspiracy and obstruction on the behalf of Trump?

Don't you understand that Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies during their lengthy investigation, which is now complete.

That group is composed of six former Trump advisers, These people was in direct contact with Trump daily

26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer.

STEVEN, Seven of these people (including five of the six former Trump advisers) have pleaded guilty of follower the wishes and orders from Trump himself and the reason why Trump have not been indicted, which Mueller made it very clear is, You can't indict a sitting President.

You have refused to read The Mueller Report which I put before you. I have asked you countless times did you view the reading of the Mueller Report and did you see the 30 min break down of that same report and you have been BULL💩 ing yourself since I made those reports available to you for over a month now. Either you don't want to know the truth or can't handle the truth about the actions of Trump and the Russian connections.

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!! That's all to it, WHY?

I've been reading the Mueller report Ron. I have it right here beside me.

Have you seen this report yet?

Don't you see STEVEN, people have lost there freedom doing acts of Conspiracy and obstruction on the behalf of Trump?

Don't you understand that Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies during their lengthy investigation, which is now complete?

Don't you understand that group is composed of six former Trump advisers, These people was in direct contact with Trump daily?

Nobody has "lost there freedom doing acts of Conspiracy and obstruction on the behalf of Trump."

What to you call serving time in prison? Ask Michael Cohen, ask George Papadopoulos, ask Alex van der Zwaan and ask Richard Pinedo and more to come.

(CNN)Four people have been sentenced to prison as part of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian election interference, with the latest being former Donald Trump attorney and fixer Michael Cohen. Here's a roundup of the four people, their crimes and their punishments.

So, you can STOP LYING NOW Steven, when you said this LIE and I quote: "Nobody has "lost there freedom doing acts of Conspiracy and obstruction on the behalf of Trump." BOOM!!!! That was a drop the mic moment.

Now prove me wrong!!!

The key words are, "on the behalf of Trump." Are you a native English speaker Ron?

That also meant that is Trump was not a sitting president, he would be right there with them.

That also meant that is Trump was not a sitting president, he would be right there with them.

Steve, did you see this video report presentation?

I've had over 2 weeks to view it Ron, I watched it way back then. Now since you think a sitting President can't be indicted, stop being a P U S S Y and impeach hims.

Keep your panties on Steve, more evidence is coming.

yeah yeah yeah

Mueller's testimony is going to do you more harm than good.

Are you calling, educating the people of The U.S. about what is in The Mueller Report, will do more harm than good?

You may have a good point Steve, that harm will be directed to TRUMP.

Educating the American people is not Mueller's job Ron.

Talking about his own Investigation, is.

You've already read it Ron. Mueller said that's all you get.

You will see Mueller testify on TV next week.

Maybe not Ron.

AG Barr talks about the census, Mueller testifying
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h0n6RHecxg4&...

That is that lying BARR's BULL💩.

Think about it Steve, if The Mueller Report clears the President from obstruction, then why don't BARR and Trump don't want the people to hear Mueller testify?

MUELLER doesn't want to testify Ron. We will see if he accepts Barr's offer of support to avoid it. I hope he does.

Relax Ron, the judgement on obstruction will be made November 3, 2020.

P.S. The President has WON the emoluments lawsuit against him.

The Question was: "Think about it Steve, if The Mueller Report clears the President from obstruction, then why don't BARR and Trump don't want the people to hear Mueller testify?"

I have not heard Barr OR Trump say they don't want Mieller to testify. Have you Ron?

Barr Changes Tune On Mueller Testimony
By dailynooze / Daily Kos (07/09/2019) -
July 9, 2019

You saw it coming, right?

A little over one month ago, AG William Barr made it appear he had no problem with Special Counsel Robert Mueller testifying before Congress. This was at a time when Mueller had not yet been subpoenaed to appear before both the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees.

“It’s Bob’s call whether he wants to testify,” said Barr during a Wall Street Journal interview.

Yesterday, Barr pulled a “Trump,” saying one thing when it is convenient to sound reasonable (i.e. Trump promising to release his tax returns) and then making a complete one-eighty when the moment of truth arrives.

While he did not come right out and say Mueller should not testify, the Attorney General of the United States, told the Associated Press yesterday, he doesn’t believe Robert Mueller should have to “subject himself” to testifying before Congress about the Russia investigation.

“I’m not sure what purpose is served by dragging him up there and trying to grill him,” Barr said. “I don’t think Mueller should be treated that way or subject himself to that, if he doesn’t want to.”

One representative, Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence committee, was not surprised by Barr’s shocking remarks…

“Barr misled the public about Mueller’s report, and wants his own deception to stand,” Schiff tweeted. “The public has a right to hear the truth, from Mueller himself, about Trump’s misconduct and ongoing national security risks.”
Think about this for one moment. The top law enforcement official in the United States is encouraging a fellow lawyer, another officer of the court, to disregard a congressional subpoena!

What needs to happen (but won’t) is for the appropriate bar association(s) to immediately open an investigation into Barr’s unprofessional and unethical conduct with a view towards disbarment.

As of now, it appears Mueller, the reluctant witness, will keep his July 17 date with Congress. But as I’ve stated before, I doubt his testimony will change much of anything. It certainly won’t light a fire under Nancy Pelosi to begin impeachment proceedings ASAP.

The Question was: "Think about it Steve, if The Mueller Report clears the President from obstruction, then why don't BARR and Trump don't want the people to hear Mueller testify?"

Barr and Trump BOTH want Mueller to testify Ron.

Not according to that report Steve. Barr is flip flopping because “Barr misled the public about Mueller’s report, and wants his own deception to stand.”

Why do you want to protect a LIE Steve?

Barr said if Mueller didn't want to testify, he would stand behind him. He didn't say he didn't want Mueller to testify. Like I've said before, you people lie ENDLESSLY.

Yesterday, Barr pulled a “Trump,” saying one thing when it is convenient to sound reasonable (i.e. Trump promising to release his tax returns) and then making a complete one-eighty when the moment of truth arrives.

While he did not come right out and say Mueller should not testify, the Attorney General of the United States, told the Associated Press yesterday, he doesn’t believe Robert Mueller should have to “subject himself” to testifying before Congress about the Russia investigation.

“I’m not sure what purpose is served by dragging him up there and trying to grill him,” Barr said. “I don’t think Mueller should be treated that way or subject himself to that, if he doesn’t want to.”

That is what Barr said. Why do you want to protect a LIE Steve?

Let's see your reference Ron.

Barr: Mueller shouldn't 'subject himself' to testimony before Congress https://news.yahoo.com/barr-mueller-should...

Barr: Mueller shouldn't 'subject himself' to testimony before Congress: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ba...

Mueller’s Hill testimony will be ‘public spectacle,’ AG Barr says
By Associated Press July 8, 2019 https://www.staradvertiser.com/2019/07/08/...

Now that I have established the FACT that BARR don't want Mueller to testily.


My question to you was: That is what Barr said. Why do you want to protect a LIE Steve?

That's nice Ron. Did you watch the video?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h0n6RHecxg4&...

Now since you have seen my references and you see that Barr really don't want Mueller to testify, my question to you still stands: Why do you still want to protect a LIE Steve?