Maafa21 PART 1 of 13

Maafa21 PART 1 of 13

The shorter segments are easier to watch.

The content need to be told and will be told, no matter how long this presentation is...

I'm just saying, I can readily view 10 minutes at a time, but on the long videos I often don't get all the way through.

I will say this about Darwin's original long title, he didn't use "race" the same way as we do today.

Steven,

I have found that many people have short attention span's especially when one is in disagreement with the exposure of long lived racial philosophies of the not to distant past and some mind sets of some in present day.

I will hold my comments on Darwin until you finish the 13 part series.

Ron, I have a short attention span in general, for any kind of video. I watched about ten minutes into your black hate video and never got back to it because I would have had to figure out where I was.

I look forward to parts 2-13.

The news media know all about short attention spans.

Steven,

Interesting play on words: " your black hate video, from my point of view Steve, this was history.

I anticipated people with short attention span's would come, If you are looking forward to part 2-13 just let part 1 play to the end and it would reboot to part 2-13 and then 3-13 and so on.

This is history in the making Steven.

I was talking about the why do black people hate black people video, not this one. Sorry.

What makes me believe that you knew exactly what you was talking about is because in one breath you called this video presentation "your Black Hate video." Steven, in your very next breath, you tell me that you cannot wait for part 2 of 13, this is after you memtioned Darwin.

Steven, just look at you, look at you, trying to sell that LIE. Are you in control of your cognitive thinking? Are you all there? WOW!!!

That one rates right up there with this: when you was talking about the Donald saying the same thing Jesus said and I asked you to Show me where Jesus said he love the poorly educated, what scripture, in what Book in The Holy Bible, show me that Steven? in that case, you tried to BULL💩 Your way Through that as well.

BOOM!!! That LIE has been busted

/*
Brother Deacon Ron Gray...

The Simple Truth of The Matter is That White America Hates Black America - "They Truly Hate What They Fear!"

~“Maafa: Life After Conquest”~

"The Ruin Of A Nation Begins In The Homes Of Its People!"

"When one comes to realize that nothing is permanent and/or forever – “What has a beginning also has an ending.” The so-called master race will, sooner, than they think, come to realize (I’m sure they have realized this already and have taken steps to stop it while attempting to convince you and me that everything is under control) that their day – era of rule has come to an end."
http://blackinamerica.com/content/273292/m...

>

George Washington wrote a letter pleading with the ‘Sultan of Morocco’ for permission to reside and engage in commerce in the ‘Americas without being destroyed!’

~"Washington's Plea to the Sultan of Morocco In The Americas"~
This report is significant in the delivery of data and/or information regarding the ‘True History’ of Blacks in World History. Many images and records of Prominent Black Leadership around the world have been ‘white-washed’ in order to present the only leadership possible is that of the white race. This article provides historic detail and recordings of agreements, pleas, deals, and pacts of bi-racial communications to the contrary whereas the lunatic assumptions detailing whites as the leaders and progenitors of “the True World Order.”
...The continuing observation and presentation of THE TRUTH!
http://blackhistory.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?b...

~ “It’s Not The Things You Know, It’s The Things You Know That Just Ain’t So!” ~

In light of Brother Deacon Ron Gray’s posted passage:
“More Evidence of “BLACKS IN THE HOLY BIBLE”
http://blackinamerica.com/content/291637/m...

Is the ‘Pope’ “the Gate-Keeper” of the ‘Illuminati?’

~ “Coat of Arms” ~
Is this the time of “THE AWAKENING?”
http://blackhistory.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?b...

...Brother Deacon, when they realized that they couldn't kill us off in the conventional fashion, they then turned to the 'WOMB!' ...But that has also been exposed in order to keep us safe and arm us with the knowledge that they are continually trying to kill us! Lincolns republicans are not the republicans of today! It has also been shown on national television, via "Eyes On The Prize," whereas one group of Black Republicans were being attacked and verbally assaulted by whites for simply showing up in support of the republican cause and/or creed! Why was that?

The history of the world was changed to show that Black People didn't do a damned thing for humanity...that lie has been exposed as well. What will they come up with next besides using law enforcement personnel to do the dirty work of murdering our youth...and now old folk are not exempt! They intend to get rid of all of us should we allow it!

‘Know Your History, Because The Current Holders of World History Will Not Tell You!’
The Ancestors Are Speaking Out To You…Black People and People of Color In General!

Thank you for allowing me a seat at the table, Good Brother! :-)

In Pride, Truth, Justice, Peace, and Love,

'G'
http://blackwomenconnect.com/cgi-bin/blog....

~ "SANKOFA" the "MAAFA" ~
*/

I did/do know what you posted Ron. It was about hate was it not?

This post is about a history of hate and I make no bones about it but not what you stated, Steven. You got busted telling me a LIE. You you think that I would not notice, that LIE?

This is what Maafa is all about. People in power using the LIE of race, as a tool to keep that the largest group of American people off the issue, now here you come.

Let's stay on the subject of hate. There's no shortage.

Why would you LIE Steven? You knew damn well what the subject of the blog. Why would you tell that LIE?

Brother Doctor Gregory Boulware, you will always have a seat at my table, always.

History is jam packed with these great moralizers.

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

In this video I provide 5 reasons why there is so much self-hate present within the African-American community. One of the main reasons why there is so much hatred within the African-American community is because there is a general lack of trust amongst African-American people. This lack of trust is expressed in many ways and is a consequence of the levels of fear that we have towards each other. Within the African-American community there is a history of betrayal, not the least of which is the parental betrayal that comes in the form of child abuse and child abandonment.


Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray
Friday, April 8th 2016 at 3:23PM

Darwin published Origin of Species in 1859. Here is Webster's 1828 definition of race that Darwin used.

RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius having the same original. This word coincides in origin with rod, ray, radiate, etc.]

1. The lineage of a family, or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called the stock. A race is the series of descendants indefinitely. Thus all mankind are called the race of Adam; the Israelites are of the race of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of a race of kings, the race of Clovis or Charlemagne; a race of nobles, etc.

Hence the long race of Alban fathers come.

2. A generation; a family of descendants. A race of youthful and unhandled colts.

3. A particular breed; as a race of mules; a race of horses; a race of sheep.

Of such a race no matter who is king.

4. A root; as race-ginger, ginger in the root or not pulverized.

5. A particular strength or taste of wine; a kind of tartness.

I see that you don't want to deal with that blatant lie you told me, Which you did not have to do but you did anyway, maybe you will answer this one, WHY ARE YOU HERE?

I didn't lie Ron, and you are the one who declines to talk about the video at hand.

On my iPhone the video does not successfully move on to part 2.

Maafa 21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America is an anti-abortion documentary film made in 2009 by pro-life activist Mark Crutcher to turn African Americans against Planned Parenthood.[1] The film, which has been enthusiastically received by anti-abortion activists, argues that the modern-day prevalence of abortion among African Americans is rooted in an attempted genocide or maafa of black people.[2][3] Considered propaganda by journalist Michelle Goldberg and historian Esther Katz, the film fits into a pro-life advertising campaign aimed at African Americans, to argue against abortion and birth control.[1][4][5][6]

The film repeats elements of an American conspiracy theory called black genocide, using many of the same arguments as black separatists such as the Black Panther Party in the early 1970s.[5][4][6][7][8][6] It misuses statistics to induce in the viewer a fear of birth control and abortion.[1][5] The film alleges that the eugenics movement targeted African Americans in the 19th and 20th centuries, that this was the basis for the creation of the American Birth Control League (now Planned Parenthood) by Margaret Sanger, and that this kind of race genocide continued in the form of the abortion-rights movement of the 20th and 21st centuries. The film puts forward the idea that Sanger was a racist who worked to reduce the population of blacks, and that Planned Parenthood is continuing this program.[5] Sanger is implicated as an ally of Nazism and Adolf Hitler.[4][9]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0eWxCRReTV4

My video stopped at 1:06, but not before I heard:

"Since 1973, legal abortion has killed more African Americans than AIDS, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and violent crime combined. Every week, more blacks die in American abortion clinics than were killed in the entire Vietnam War."

The Ma-afa

Steven,

Did you read the information of the link that you provided me? If not, take the time to read this:

This film is not mine. It was done by an excellent team of researchers and filmmakers, whom I encourage you to meet and support, at http://www.maafa21.com/. I encourage each and every viewer to buy a DVD copy of this film and *please support the filmmakers' work* by whichever way you can. I am posting this as a means to help spread their powerful information -- this film has not had the visibility that it deserves, and that it must have.

Maafa 21 is a documentary on the modern eugenics movement, from its roots in 19th century imperialist Europe and in various post-slavery elitist milieus in America, to the Third Reich and its Final Solution for the "Jewish question" -- the film proceeds on to today, where it exposes the incredible proportions of the culling of Black people by abortion, in 21st century America.

"Maafa" is a Swahili word which means "a terrible tragedy", and indeed that is what has been imposed upon millions of eugenical victims across the world, to this very day.

Case in point, the African-American population. After decades of slavery in the neo-feudal South, Black Americans went on to become the prime target for U.S. eugenicists. The main vehicle for this was - and is - abortion. The documentary follows the life and career of Margaret Sanger, a racist, reactionary feudalist, who created the American Birth Control League to promote the sterilization and abortion of "unfit" people, under the abused labels of "social work" and "charity". The motto was "more from the fit, less from the unfit", and it was all funded by the habitual Wall Street pack of bankers, lawyers, and foundation executives. In the meanwhile, fascism was rising in Europe, much to the joy of Sanger and her fellow eugenicists, who saw this as a chance to have truly eugenic regimes, and a general "cleansing of the race", and cheered on as people like Hitler and Mussolini spread their reigns of ethnic cleansing and terror.

World War II discredited eugenics across the board, as people witnessed the ultimate consequences of this social hygienism: the scurrilous persecution of Jews, Gypsies, and other minorities, and then the concentration camp, forced labor, the gas chamber.

When Auschwitz and Treblinka totaled the reputation of eugenics, Sanger and her Wall Street backers were forced to reinvent the eugenics movement, and this was done by a radical makeover, in terms of image, of slogans and of rhetoric. From now on, things were no longer to be presented in terms of racial and social hygiene. Things became infinitely subtler, and the eugenics movement became infinitely more dangerous. Now, it was all about "population control", "demographic balance" and even "environmental conservation" -- the "too many people" discourse that is trumpeted to this very day. This was eventually translated into global economic decision-making via neo-feudalist institutions such as UN, IMF, World Bank. The "too many people", neo-Malthusian rhetoric is the obvious companion of a general global drift into corporatist (i.e. fascist) reasoning and methodology, and this is at the core of what is now commonly known as "sustainability". The paradigm is that you don't raise standards of living across the world, and empower people with middle class economies, and ever improving technological development. No, you keep them in squalor, under enforced arrested development, and impose a commune-type social environment, under "corporate governance" (i.e., fascism). This is what has come to be known as Agenda 21 communitarianism, the UN-sponsored, "socially equitable" organization model for the 21st century -- non-development and fascism.
Now, a big part of this, in strictly eugenical terms is "family planning". This concept is sold through valid initiatives such as the free distribution of contraceptives to poor populations. Yet, its real, ugly, final face is sterilization and abortion. You don't raise the family's standard of living; instead, you reduce the family standard in itself, or even prevent it from coming to fruition at all.

The key institution in terms of this is Planned Parenthood, created by Margaret Sanger after WWII. This institution kills more African Americans every year through abortion, than are killed from every other cause combined. It was globalized through the UN system, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). The IPPF has many branches and cohorts, and has become the epicenter of a global eugenics network that is responsible for millions of sterilizations and abortions yearly, worldwide, mostly in third world countries. After decades of this, the IPPF has more than earned a sinister right to be known as a global equivalent to the SS Bureau of Race and Resettlement, the III Reich institution responsible for depopulation in the Nazi empire.

Get informed and act. In the past there was one Simon Wiesenthal. In the future there will be thousands -- but it's up to you to make that happen.

So we are both anti-abortion. Good.

I am also anti the annihilation of The Black American and any so called racial purity programs in this country.

So what about poverty? What about drugs?

Those should be recognized and Identified for what they are, tools of the evil ones.

Would you legalise drugs? I would, that's an easy step.

Both poverty and drugs must be recognized as tools of the evil ones. By the way Steven, here is that LIE you told, for your review:

I was talking about the why do black people hate black people video, not this one. Sorry.

Now before you told that LIE, you said this:

Ron, I have a short attention span in general, for any kind of video. I watched about ten minutes into your black hate video and never got back to it because I would have had to figure out where I was.
Wednesday, April 13th 2016 at 10:28AM

Then in your very next reply you said this:
I look forward to parts 2-13.
Wednesday, April 13th 2016 at 10:28AM

Steven, these are your words Steven and no one else said this but you. STOP IT Steven, you are looking very foolish right now.

Bull**** Ron. You are looking not only foolish but stupid."WHY DO BLACK PEOPLE HATE BLACK PEOPLE?" That is your "black hate" video.

So Ron, did you watch THIS video? Lynched in the womb, that's the agenda.

STEVEN, STEVEN, STEVEN,

I know why you are running from your own words because you know well that "WHY DO BLACK PEOPLE HATE BLACK PEOPLE?" is not the topic of this blog and you got caught using the tricks of the evil ones which maybe a part of your nature.

Steven, You did not have to LIE to me, which you never did tell me WHY but that is alright. The major and greater point is, that I recognize that FACT, when I saw you coming.

I trust that you saw the improvements to the beginning of this blog. I have added 13 links because some other people may have some techno difficulties with viewing this very important information.

So, you said that you have seen part 1 of 13, is that correct? I also see your question of: “So Ron, did you watch THIS video? Lynched in the womb, that's the agenda.” Steven, Yes I did. YES, I did and Steve, this was a program of the elites called eugenics and for some, not all, but for some seems like the perfect solution to what been known as “THE NEGRO DILEMMA.”

Let us talk about what you saw. Did you see and understand of the hidden agenda of the Maafa? Which began almost two hundred and fifty years ago and this period of history has come to be known by Swahili word THE MAAFA. The FACT that the slaves where free, the MAAFA is still or have not ended yet. Do you understand that? Let us talk about what is keeping the MAAFA alive and well today, OK!

One of the main reasons why The MAAFA is well and alive today is because of Ignorance to the FACT that this program is still alive and well.

.

I've seen the entire video Ron. "lynched in the womb" are the words of the black preacher at the end. This video reinforced what I'd already known when my wife went to Planned Parenthood and aborted our black baby.

Remember too that the government is responsible for letting drugs into the black community, but the don't want to be supporting the crack babies now do they?

If you saw the entire video, then why didn't you answer my question of: ' what was found in part 1 of 13, which is the understanding of MAAFA, the perfect solution to what has been known by some, not all as “THE NEGRO DILEMMA?”

Steven, I never did ask you about the end of this video, what I have asked you was contained in PART 1 of 13.

I am very sorry to hear about what your wife did to your child but Steven I hope that you can understand that your personal experience is not the topic in this discussion.

If you want to comment on this issue please feel free but it will be connected to the questions asked and the material covered in this blog, these are the only guidelines.

If we can continue, I would like to talk about the material covered in Part 1 of 13/

The question is: Did you see and understand of the hidden agenda of the Maafa?

Did you understand how MAAFA got it's history?

Sure I saw it Ron, that's why I commented on what Darwin meant by "race". You promised a response to that after I'd viewed the entire video. Now I have.

He didn't use it the way you do Ron. My suggestion is to not play into the President's perpetuation of the race problem. I don't.

What is it that you want to know about what Darwin said about race? Here is what Charles Darwin said: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world… The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state… and some ape as ow as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla.” Charles Darwin 1890

Charles Darwin and his cousin Frances Galton was birds of a feather, they where locked together on the same path White Superiority. Frances Galton coined the phrase “EUGENICS.”

I know you did not ask me about Frances Galton but I just want to add more evidence that Frances Galton and Charles Darwin was birds of a feather., check this out: “… The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873” Steven, what do you think FRANCIS GALTON was talking about?

Steven, that statement of Charles Darwin was unfortunate, it was from a Godless soul. Many of the elite, not all but many of the elite was concern about their fortunes and affluences much like they do today but now it is more fine tune to class and they use race to keep the poorer classes against one other while the oligarch’s pick all of our pockets, both Black and White. The sad part about that is, this poor white man thinks he is immune from this plan because of white privilege.

YOUR WORDS: He didn't use it the way you do Ron. My suggestion is to not play into the President's perpetuation of the race problem. I don't.

What president? Are you talking about the president of the banks? Or the president of the insurance companies? Or the presidents of the Rail Roads? Or even the president of the News Papers? The FACT is, I am sure that you are not talking about the current day President of The United States of America because he was not mention in Maafa 21 PART 1 of 13.

Now that I have answered your question in detail, now here is my question to you: The question is: Steven, what do you think FRANCIS GALTON was talking about? Did you see and understand of the hidden agenda of the Maafa? Did you understand how MAAFA got its history?

My answer will be multi-part, but i will answer all your questions Ron. First, about what Darwin said. I didn't ask anything, I made an observation about the usage of the word race in the original title in 1859.

The 1890 quote from Darwin contains two elipses. I'd like to see the original but the video didn't say where the quote was pulled from. I'll try to find it since they at least gave a date.

Charles Darwin died in 1882 so the quote obviously isn't from 1890.

In chapter seven (The Races of Man), Darwin considered the classification of human races. He explicitly declined to detail the differences between them, which he described as “an enormous subject which has been fully discussed in many valuable works”.(Descent, 2nd Ed, 1874, pages 2 + 166) Darwin firmly believed in the distinctness of human races and he wanted them to be classified in the same way as other animals. Thus, he set out to determine whether they were subspecies or species.(1874, page 180) The test for Darwin was whether the races were “specifically distinct”.(1874, page 167) Unlike in modern times, whether or not different races could successfully interbreed was only one of multiple factors to consider in determining whether they were distinct species.(1874, page 172)

Darwin first presented some arguments that human races were different species.(1874, page 167) He pointed out that that different races “are distinguished by many differences in structure and constitution, some being of importance” and that these differences have “remained nearly constant for very long periods of time”.(1874, page 173) Darwin cited evidence suggesting that there was not perfect fertility between all the races and further stated that even if there was perfect fertility, this “would not absolutely preclude us from ranking them as distinct species”.(1874, page 172)

Darwin next presented arguments that humans were all the same species, pointing out that in South America there were many people “with the most complex crosses between Negroes, Indians, and Europeans”.(1874, page 173) He found that “there is the greatest possible diversity amongst capable judges” on the number of races or species that humans should be divided into.(1874, page 174) He said the races all graduated into each other and their distinctive characteristics were highly variable.(1874, page 174)

Darwin ultimately held that human races were subspecies,(1874, pages 176 + 608) but said that the issue was partly semantic. He wrote that the definition of species is “so arbitrary”(1874, page 177) that “it is almost a matter of indifference” whether human races “are ranked as species or sub-species”.(1874, page 180)

Darwin described the extinction of human races. He reported that many races and sub-races had gone extinct and that this chiefly followed “from the competition of tribe with tribe, and race with race”.(1874, page 182)

Darwin concluded that the visual differences between races were not adaptive to any significant degree, and were more likely simply caused by s*xual selection—different standards of beauty and mating amongst different people.

Darwin also considered the origins of the human races in chapter 7. Polygenists believed that human races had separate origins. In contrast, Darwin presented evidence that humans all had a common origin, a view known as monogenism. He concludes that "...when the principle of evolution is generally accepted, as it surely will be before long, the dispute between the monogenists and the polygenists will die a silent and unobserved death."[8]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Descen...

ON THE RACES OF MAN.

http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frames...

Pages 214-250. But I haven't found the quote yet.

Here is the complete passage:


On the Birthplace and Antiquity of Man.—We are naturally led to enquire where was the birthplace of man at that stage of descent when our progenitors diverged from the Catarhine stock. The fact that they belonged to this stock clearly shews that they inhabited the Old World; but not Australia nor any oceanic island, as we may infer from the laws of geographical distribution. In each great region of the world the living mammals are closely related to the extinct species of the same region. It is therefore probable that Africa was formerly inhabited by extinct apes closely allied to the gorilla and chimpanzee; and as these two species are now man's nearest allies, it is somewhat more probable that our early progenitors lived on the African continent than elsewhere. But it is useless to speculate on this subject, for an ape nearly as large as a man, namely the Dryopithecus of Lartet, which was closely allied to the anthropomorphous Hylobates, existed in Europe during the Upper Miocene period; and since so remote a period the earth has certainly undergone many great revolutions, and there has been ample time for migration on the largest scale.

15 Häckel has come to this same conclusion. See 'Ueber die Entstehung des Menschengeschlechts,' in Virchow's 'Sammlung. gemein. wissen. Vorträge,' 1868, s. 61. Also his 'Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte,' 1868, in which he gives in detail his views on the genealogy of man.

[page] 200

At the period and place, whenever and wherever it may have been, when man first lost his hairy covering, he probably inhabited a hot country; and this would have been favourable for a frugiferous diet, on which, judging from analogy, he subsisted. We are far from knowing how long ago it was when man first diverged from the Catarhine stock; but this may have occurred at an epoch as remote as the Eocene period; for the higher apes had diverged from the lower apes as early as the Upper Miocene period, as shewn by the existence of the Dryopithecus. We are also quite ignorant at how rapid a rate organisms, whether high or low in the scale, may under favourable circumstances be modified: we know, however, that some have retained the same form during an enormous lapse of time. From what we see going on under domestication, we learn that within the same period some of the co-descendants of the same species may be not at all changed, some a little, and some greatly changed. Thus it may have been with man, who has undergone a great amount of modification in certain characters in comparison with the higher apes.

The great break in the organic chain between man and his nearest allies, which cannot be bridged over by any extinct or living species, has often been advanced as a grave objection to the belief that man is descended from some lower form; but this objection will not appear of much weight to those who, convinced by general reasons, believe in the general principle of evolution. Breaks incessantly occur in all parts of the series, some being wide, sharp and defined, others less so in various degrees; as between the orang and its nearest allies—between the Tarsius and the other Lemuridæ—between the elephant and in a more striking manner between the Ornithorhynchus or

[page] 201

Echidna, and other mammals. But all these breaks depend merely on the number of related forms which have become extinct. At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked,16 will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

With respect to the absence of fossil remains, serving to connect man with his ape-like progenitors, no one will lay much stress on this fact, who will read Sir C. Lyell's discussion,17 in which he shews that in all the vertebrate classes the discovery of fossil remains has been an extremely slow and fortuitous process. Nor should it be forgotten that those regions which are the most likely to afford remains connecting man with some extinct ape-like creature, have not as yet been searched by geologists.

I'll pause here Ron.

We have a long way to go before we get to how President Obama has perpetuated the race problem.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

My video stopped at 1:06, but not before I heard:

"Since 1973, legal abortion has killed more African Americans than AIDS, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and violent crime combined. Every week, more blacks die in American abortion clinics than were killed in the entire Vietnam War."

The Ma-afa

Thursday, April 14th 2016 at 5:03PM
Steve Williams

****************************************************************************

'black' Identification by African Asians in a europeanRacistly Ignorant paganChristian Belief system IS THE ONLY cause of why the 'blackPeople' HATE and KILL themselves so MUCH in America

'black' Identification by African Asians in a europeanRacistly Ignorant paganChristian Belief system IS THE ONLY cause of why the 'blackPeople' HATE and KILL themselves so MUCH in Africa Asia

The 'black' Identification is 'WHITE SUPREMACY' and the 'blackPeople' HATE self cause they cannot EVEN with albinoGenetic Addition become 'white'

'blackHebrewIsraelite' .... 'whiteMan' steveAdam ... STOP your RACISTLY IGNORANT hate FRAUD that started in

.............Maafa21 PART 1492 and CONTINUES in Maafa21 PART 2016

Boby,

So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

Is not is not the subject matter of this blog and you took off with the LIE Steven told you, WOW!!!

First of all Steven, we was discussing the material found in MAAFA21 Part 1 of 13 and I kept my comments of Darwin remarks with was found there in. You have not addressed any of my questions to you yet but you free save by flooding this blog with unrelated subject mater and BULL 💩 Material not covered in MAAFA 21.

I am away from my desk right now but I really like to tell you ass in detail what you are doing to some very important information to the American people.

I told you I'd answer all your questions Ron. Darwin has nothing to do with the maafa. I'm ready to move on if you are.

In MAAFA 21 part 1 of 13 did you see what Darwin said? No, you are not ready to move but you are ready to run from this heat that I want to tell your ass about.

Ron, I posted the whole section aafter reading through The Descent of Man for a couple hours. It's probably safe to say I read a whole lot more of what Darwin said about race than you did.

Sound bites, video bites, quote bites... All empty calories Ron.

Now let's take a look at Francis Galton.

Here's the full context of the first Galton quote. December 1857.

http://galton.org/essays/1850-1859/galton-...

/*
Brother Deacon Ron Gray:

Herein lies the blueprints of a man that was beget by another man who had a plan for Black Folks who sought housing...

"A Postwar Housing Haven In The Hot/LZ – for whites Only!"
As Presented
By
Gregory V. Boulware, Esq.
Research By Mrs. Virginia M. Boulware, RN
http://www.BoulwareEnterprises.com
http://blackhistory.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?i...

ELECTIONS 2016, U.S. NEWS

New documents reveal how Donald Trump’s racist dad inspired Woody Guthrie’s most bitter writings
The Conversation THE CONVERSATION
21 JAN 2016 AT 11:06 ET
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/new-docume...

"In December 1950, Woody Guthrie signed his name to the lease of a new apartment in Brooklyn. Even now, over half a century later, that uninspiring document prompts a double-take.

Below all the legal jargon is the signature of the man who had composed “This Land Is Your Land,” the most resounding appeal to an equal share for all in America. Below that is the signature of Donald Trump’s father, Fred. No pairing could appear more unlikely.

Guthrie’s two-year tenancy in one of Fred Trump’s buildings and his relationship with the real estate mogul of New York’s outer boroughs produced some of Guthrie’s most bitter writings, which I discovered on a recent trip to the Woody Guthrie Archives in Tulsa. These writings have never before been published; they should be, for they clearly pit America’s national balladeer against the racist foundations of the Trump real estate empire.

Recalling these foundations becomes all the more relevant in the wake of the racially charged proclamations of Donald Trump, who last year announced, “My legacy has its roots in my father’s legacy.”

A champion for equality

By the time he moved into his new apartment, Guthrie had traveled a long road from the casual racism of his Oklahoma youth.

He’d learned along the way that the North held no special claim to racial enlightenment. He had written songs such as “The Ferguson Brothers Killing,” which condemned the out-of-hand police killing of the unarmed Charles and Alfonso Ferguson in Freeport, Long Island, in 1946, after the two young black men had been refused service in a bus terminal cafe.

In “Buoy Bells from Trenton,” he denounced the miscarriage of justice in the case of the so-called “Trenton Six” – black men convicted of murder in 1948 by an all-white jury in a trial marred by official perjury and manufactured evidence.

And in 1949, he’d stood shoulder to shoulder with Paul Robeson, Howard Fast and Pete Seeger against the mobs of Peekskill, New York, where American racism at its ugliest had inspired 21 songs from his pen (one of which, “My Thirty Thousand,” was recorded by Billy Bragg and Wilco).

A postwar housing haven – for whites

In the postwar years, with the return of hundreds of thousands of servicemen to New York, affordable public housing had become an urgent priority.

For the most part, low-cost housing projects had been left to cash-strapped state and city authorities. But when the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) finally stepped in to issue federal loans and subsidies for urban apartment blocks, one of the first developers in line, with his eye on the main chance, was Fred Trump. He made a fortune not only through the construction of public housing projects but also through collecting the rents on them.

When Guthrie first signed his lease, it’s unlikely that he was aware of the murky background to the construction of his new home, the massive public complex that Trump had dubbed “Beach Haven.”

Trump would be investigated by a U.S. Senate committee in 1954 for profiteering off of public contracts, not least by overestimating his Beach Haven building charges to the tune of US$3.7 million.

What Guthrie discovered all too late was Trump’s enthusiastic embrace of the FHA’s guidelines for avoiding “inharmonious uses of housing” – or as Trump biographer Gwenda Blair puts it, “a code phrase for selling homes in white areas to blacks.” As Blair points out, such “restrictive covenants” were common among FHA projects – a betrayal, if ever there was one, of the New Deal vision that had given birth to the agency.

‘Old Man Trump’s’ color line

Only a year into his Beach Haven residency, Guthrie – himself a veteran – was already lamenting the bigotry that pervaded his new, lily-white neighborhood, which he’d taken to calling “*** Havens.”

In his notebooks, he conjured up a scenario of smashing the color line to transform the Trump complex into a diverse cornucopia, with “a face of every bright color laffing and joshing in these old darkly weeperish empty shadowed windows.” He imagined himself calling out in Whitman-esque free verse to the “negro girl yonder that walks along against this headwind / holding onto her purse and her fur coat”:

I welcome you here to live. I welcome
you and your man both here to Beach Haven to love in any
ways you please and to have some kind of a decent place to
get pregnant in and to have your kids raised up in. I'm
yelling out my own welcome to you.

For Guthrie, Fred Trump came to personify all the viciousness of the racist codes that continued to put decent housing – both public and private – out of reach for so many of his fellow citizens:

I suppose
Old Man Trump knows
Just how much
Racial Hate
he stirred up
In the bloodpot of human hearts
When he drawed
That color line
Here at his
Eighteen hundred family project ....

And as if to leave no doubt over Trump’s personal culpability in perpetuating black Americans’ status as internal refugees – strangers in their own strange land – Guthrie reworked his signature Dust Bowl ballad “I Ain’t Got No Home” into a blistering broadside against his landlord:

Beach Haven ain't my home!
I just cain't pay this rent!
My money's down the drain!
And my soul is badly bent!
Beach Haven looks like heaven
Where no black ones come to roam!
No, no, no! Old Man Trump!
Old Beach Haven ain't my home!

In 1979, 12 years after Guthrie had succumbed to the death sentence of Huntington’s Disease, Village Voice reporter Wayne Barrett published a two-part exposé about Fred and Donald Trump’s real estate empire.

Barrett devoted substantial attention to the cases brought against the Trumps in 1973 and 1978 by the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Justice Department. A major charge was that “racially discriminatory conduct by Trump agents” had “created a substantial impediment to the full enjoyment of equal opportunity.” The most damning evidence had come from Trump’s own employees. As Barrett summarizes:

According to court records, four superintendents or rental agents confirmed that applications sent to the central [Trump] office for acceptance or rejection were coded by race. Three doormen were told to discourage blacks who came seeking apartments when the manager was out, either by claiming no vacancies or hiking up the rents. A super said he was instructed to send black applicants to the central office but to accept white applications on site. Another rental agent said that Fred Trump had instructed him not to rent to blacks. Further, the agent said Trump wanted “to decrease the number of black tenants” already in the development “by encouraging them to locate housing elsewhere.”
Guthrie had written that white supremacists like the Trumps were “way ahead of God” because

God dont
know much
about any color lines.

Guthrie hardly meant this as a compliment. But the Trumps – father and son alike – might well have been arrogant enough to see it as one. After all, if you find yourself “way ahead of God” in any kind of a race, then what else must God be except, well, “a loser”? And we know what Donald Trump thinks about losers.

One thing is certain: Woody Guthrie had no time for “Old Man Trump.”

We can only imagine what he would think of his heir.

“Racial Hate at Beach Haven,” “Beach Haven Race Hate,” “Beach Haven Ain’t My Home” and Guthrie’s untitled notebook writings: all words by Woody Guthrie, © copyright Woody Guthrie Publications, Inc., all rights reserved, used by permission.

The Conversation

By Will Kaufman, Professor of American Literature and Culture, University of Central Lancashire

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/new-docume...
>
Til Next Time...

In Pride, Truth, Justice, Peace, and Love,

'G'
https://twitter.com/#!/AuthorBoulwareG
https://independent.academia.edu/GregoryVB...
http://blackisms.com/education-2/

~ "SANKOFA" the "MAAFA" ~
*/

Here is the full context of the second quote, though there are some obvious typos.

http://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chine...

Why Obama Wants Control of the Census
Counting citizens is a powerful political tool.
By JOHN FUND
Updated Feb. 10, 2009 11:59 p.m. ET
President Obama said in his inaugural address that he planned to "restore science to its rightful place" in government. That's a worthy goal. But statisticians at the Commerce Department didn't think it would mean having the director of next year's Census report directly to the White House rather than to the Commerce secretary, as is customary. "There's only one reason to have that high level of White House involvement," a career professional at the Census Bureau tells me. "And it's called politics, not science."

The decision was made last week after California Rep. Barbara Lee, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Hispanic groups complained to the White House that Judd Gregg, the Republican senator from New Hampshire slated to head Commerce, couldn't be trusted to conduct a complete Census. The National Association of Latino Officials said it had "serious questions about his willingness to ensure that the 2010 Census produces the most accurate possible count."

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123423384887...

As a matter of impact, the census has tremendous political significance. Political parties are always eager to have a hand in redrawing districts so that they can maximize their own party's clout while minimizing the opposition, often through gerrymandering.

The census also determines the composition of the Electoral College, which chooses the president. If one party were to control the census, it could arguably try to perpetuate its hold on political power.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/09...

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
222 of 305
Next page End
198 galton.org 198 Inquiries into Human Faculty with a little power and intelligence, he ought, I submit, to awake to a fuller knowledge of his relatively great position, and begin to assume a deliberate part in furthering the great work of evolution. He may infer the course it is bound to pursue, from his observation of that which it has already followed, and he might devote his modicum of power, intelligence, and kindly feeling to render its future progress less slow and painful. Man has already furthered evolution very considerably, half unconsciously, and for his own personal advantages, but he has not yet risen to the conviction that it is his religious duty to do so deliberately and systematically. SELECTION AND RACE. The fact of an individual being naturally gifted with high qualities, may be due either to his being an exceptionally good specimen of a poor race, or an average specimen of a high one. The difference of origin would betray itself in his descendants; they would revert towards the typical centre of their race, deteriorating in the first case but not in the second. The two cases, though theoretically distinct, are confused in reality, owing to the frequency with which exceptional personal qualities connote the departure of the entire nature of the individual from his ancestral type, and the formation of a new strain having its own typical centre. It is hardly necessary to add that it is in this indirect way that natural selection improves a race. The two events of selection and difference of race ought, however, to be carefully distinguished in broad practical considerations, while the frequency of their concurrence is borne in mind and allowed for. So long as the race remains radically the same, the stringent selection of the best specimens to rear and breed from, can never lead to any permanent result. The attempt to raise the standard of such a race is like the labour of Sisyphus in rolling his stone uphill; let the effort be relaxed for a moment, and the stone will roll back. Whenever a new typical centre appears, it is as though there was a facet upon the lower surface of the stone, on which it is capable of resting without rolling back. It affords a temporary sticking-point in the forward progress of evolution.
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
223 of 305
Next page End
galton.org 199 Selection and Race 199 The causes that check the unlimited improvement of highly-bred animals, so long as the race remains unchanged, are many and absolute. In the first place there is an increasing delicacy of constitution; the growing fineness of limb and structure end, after a few generations, in fragility. Overbred animals have little stamina; they resemble in this respect the “weedy” colts so often reared from first-class racers. One can perhaps see in a general way why this should be so. Each individual is the outcome of a vast number of organic elements of the most various species, just as some nation-might be the outcome of a vast number of castes of individuals, each caste monopolising a special pursuit. Banish a number of the humbler castes—the bakers, the bricklayers, and the smiths, and the nation would soon come to grief. This is what is done in high breeding; certain qualities are bred for, and the rest are diminished as far as possible, but they cannot be dispensed with entirely. The next difficulty lies in the diminished fertility of highly-bred animals. It is not improbable that its cause is of the same character as that of the delicacy of their constitution. Together with infertility is combined some degree of s*xual indifference, or when passion is shown, it is not unfrequently for some specimen of a coarser type. This is certainly the case with horses and with dogs. It will be easily understood that these difficulties, which are so formidable in the case of plants and animals, which we can mate as we please and destroy when we please, would make the maintenance of a highly-selected breed of men an impossibility. Whenever a low race is preserved under conditions of life that exact a high level of efficiency, it must be subjected to rigorous selection. The few best specimens of that race can alone be allowed to become parents, and not many of their descendants can be allowed to live. On the other hand; if a higher race be substituted for the low one, all this terrible misery disappears. The most merciful form of what I ventured to call “eugenics” would consist in watching for the indications of superior strains or races, and in so favoring them that their progeny shall outnumber and gradually
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
224 of 305
Next page End
200 galton.org 200 Inquiries into Human Faculty replace that of the old one. Such strains are of no infrequent occurrence. It is easy to specify families who are characterised by strong resemblances, and whose features and character are usually prepotent over those of their wives or husbands in their joint offspring, and who are at the same time as prolific as the average of their class. These strains can be conveniently studied in the families of exiles, which, for obvious reasons, are easy to trace in their various branches. The debt that most countries owe to the race of men whom they received from one another as immigrants, whether leaving their native country of their own free will, or as exiles on political or religious grounds, has been often pointed out, and may, I think, be accounted for as follows :—The fact of a man leaving his compatriots, or so irritating them that they compel him to go, is fair evidence that either he or they, or both, feel that his character is alien to theirs. Exiles are also on the whole men of considerable force of character; a quiet man would endure and succumb, he would not have energy to transplant himself or to become so conspicuous as to be an object of general attack. We may justly infer from this, that exiles are on the whole men of exceptional and energetic natures, and it is especially from such men as these that new strains of race are likely to proceed. INFLUENCE OF MAN UPON RACE. The influence of man upon the nature of his own race has already been very large, but it has not been intelligently directed, and has in many instances done great harm. Its action has been by invasions and migration of races, by war and massacre, by wholesale deportation of population, by emigration, and by many social customs which have a silent but widespread effect. There exists a sentiment, for the most part quite unreasonable, against the gradual extinction of an inferior race. It rests on some confusion between the race and the individual, as if the destruction of a race was equivalent to the destruction of a large number of men. It is nothing of the kind when the process of extinction works silently and slowly through
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
225 of 305
Next page End
galton.org 201 Influence of Man upon Race 201 the earlier marriage of members of the superior race, through their greater vitality under equal stress, through their better chances of getting a livelihood, or through their prepotency in mixed marriages. That the members of an inferior class should dislike being elbowed out of the way is another matter; but it may be somewhat brutally argued that whenever two individuals struggle for a single place, one must yield, and that there will be no more unhappiness on the whole, if the inferior yield to the superior than conversely, whereas the world will be permanently enriched by the success of the superior. The conditions of happiness are, however, too complex to be disposed of by à priori argument; it is safest to appeal to observation. I think it could be easily shown that when the differences between the races is not so great as to divide them into obviously different classes, and where their language, education, and general interests are the same, the substitution may take place gradually without any unhappiness. Thus the movements of commerce have introduced fresh and vigorous blood into various parts of England: the new-corners have intermarried with the residents, and their characteristics have been prepotent in the descendants of the mixed marriages. I have referred in the earlier part of the book to the changes of type in the English nature that have occurred during the last few hundred years. These have been effected so silently that we only know of them by the results. One of the most misleading of words is that of “aborigines.” Its use dates from the time when the cosmogony was thought to be young and life to be of very recent appearance. Its usual meaning seems to be derived from the supposition that nations disseminated themselves like colonists from a common centre about four thousand years, say 120 generations ago, and thenceforward occupied their lands undisturbed until the very recent historic period with which the narrator deals, when some invading host drove out the “aborigines.” This idyllic view of the march of events is contradicted by ancient sepulchral remains, by language, and by the habits of those modern barbarians whose history we know. There are probably hardly any spots on the earth that have not, within the last few thousand years, been tenanted by very
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
226 of 305
Next page End
202 galton.org 202 Inquiries into Human Faculty different races; none hardly that have not been tenanted by very different tribes having the character of at least sub-races. The absence of a criterion to distinguish between races and sub-races, and our ethnological ignorance generally, makes it impossible to offer more than a very off-hand estimate of the average variety of races in the different countries of the world. I have, however, endeavoured to form one, which I give with much hesitation, knowing how very little it is worth. I registered the usually recognised races inhabiting each of upwards of twenty countries, and who at the same time formed at least half per cent of the population. It was, I am perfectly aware, a very rough proceeding, so rough that for the United Kingdom I ignored the prehistoric types and accepted only the three headings of British, Low Dutch, and Norman-French. Again, as regards India I registered as follows :—Forest tribes (numerous), Dravidian (three principal divisions), Early Arian, Tartar (numerous, including Afghans), Arab, and lastly European, on account of their political importance, notwithstanding the fewness of their numbers. Proceeding in this off-hand way, and after considering the results, the broad conclusion to which I arrived was that on the average at least three different recognised races were to be found in every moderately-sized district on the earth’s surface. The materials were far too scanty to enable any idea to be formed of the rate of change in the relative numbers of the constituent races in each country, and still less to estimate, the secular changes of type in those races. It may be well to take one or two examples of intermixture. Spain was occupied in the earliest historic times by at least two races, of whom we know very little; it was afterwards colonised here and there by Phoenicians in its southern ports, and by Greeks in its eastern. In the third century B.C. it was invaded by the Carthaginians, who conquered and held a large part of it, but were afterwards supplanted by the Romans, who ruled it more or less completely for 700 years. It was invaded in the fifth century A.D. by a succession of German tribes, and was finally completely overrun by the Visigoths, who ruled it
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
227 of 305
Next page End
galton.org 203 Influence of Man upon Race 203 for more than 200 years. Then came the invasion of the Moors, who rapidly conquered the whole of the Peninsula up to the mountains of Asturias, where the Goths still held their own, and whence they issued from time to time and ultimately recovered the country. The present population consists of the remnants of one or more tribes of ancient Iberians, of the still more ancient Basques, and of relics of all the invaders who have just been named. There is, besides, a notable proportion of Gypsies and not a few Jews. This is obviously a most heterogeneous mixture, but to fully appreciate the diversity of its origin the several elements should be traced farther back towards their sources. Thus, the Moors are principally descendants of Arabs, who flooded the northern provinces of Africa in successive waves of emigration eastwards, both before and after the Hegira, partly combining with the Berbers as they went, and partly displacing them from the littoral districts and driving them to the oases of the Sahara, whence they in their turn displaced the Negro population, whom they drove down to the Soudan. The Gypsies, according to Sir Henry Rawlinson,[1] came from the Indo-Scythic tribes who inhabited the mouths of the Indus, and began to migrate northward, from the fourth century onward. They settled in the Chaldean marshes, assumed independence and defied the caliph. In A.D. 831 the grandson of Haroun al-Raschid sent a large expedition against them, which, after slaughtering ten thousand, deported the whole of the remainder first to Baghdad and thence onwards to Persia. They continued unmanageable in their new home, and were finally transplanted to the Cilician frontier in Asia Minor, and established there as a military colony to guard the passes of the Taurus. In A.D. 962 the Greeks, having obtained some temporary successes, drove the Gypsies back more into the interior, whence they gradually moved towards the Hellespont under the pressure of the advancing Seljukians, during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. They then crossed over to Europe [1] Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society, vol. i. This account of the routes of the Gypsies is by no means universally accepted, nor, indeed, was offered as a complete solution of the problem of their migration, but it will serve to show how complex that problem is.
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
228 of 305
Next page End
204 galton.org 204 Inquiries into Human Faculty and gradually overspread it, where they are now estimated to number more than three millions. It must not be supposed that emigration on a large scale implies even a moderate degree of civilisation among those who emigrate, because the process has been frequently traced among the more barbarous tribes, to say nothing of the evidence largely derived from ancient burial-places. My own impression of the races in South Africa was one of a continual state of ferment and change, of the rapid development of some clan here and of the complete or almost complete suppression of another clan there. The well-known history of the rise of the Zulus and the destruction of their neighbours is a case in point. In the country with which I myself was familiar the changes had been numerous and rapid in the preceding few years, and there were undoubted signs of much more important substitutions of race in bygone times. The facts were briefly these: Damara Land was inhabited by pastoral tribes of the brown Bantu race who were in continual war with various alternations of fortune, and the several tribes had special characteristics that were readily appreciated by themselves. On the tops of the escarped hills lived a fugitive black people speaking a vile dialect of Hottentot, and families of yellow Bushmen were found in the lowlands wherever the country was unsuited for the pastoral Damaras. Lastly, the steadily encroaching Namaquas, a superior Hottentot race, lived on the edge of the district. They had very much more civilisation than the Bushmen, and more than the Damaras, and they contained a large infusion of Dutch blood. The interpretation of all this was obviously that the land had been tenanted a long time ago by Negroes, that an invasion of Bushmen drove the Negroes to the hills, and that the supremacy of these lasted so long that the Negroes lost their own language and acquired that of the Bushmen. Then an invasion of a tribe of Bantu race supplanted the Bushmen, and the Bantus, after endless struggles among themselves, were being pushed aside at the time I visited them by the incoming Namaquas, who themselves are a mixed race. This is merely a sample of Africa; everywhere there are evidences of changing races.
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
229 of 305
Next page End
galton.org 205 Influence of Man upon Race 205 The last 300 or 400 years, say the last ten generations of mankind, have witnessed changes of population on the largest scale, by the extension of races long resident in Europe to the temperate regions of Asia, Africa, America, and Australasia. Siberia was barely known to the Russians of nine generations ago, but since that time it has been continuously overspread by their colonists, soldiers, political exiles, and transported criminals; already some two-thirds of its population are Slaves. In South Africa the settlement at the Cape of Good Hope is barely six generations old, yet during that time a curious and continuous series of changes has taken place, resulting in the substitution of an alien population for the Hottentots in the south and the Bantus in the north. One-third of it is white, consisting of Dutch, English, descendants of French Huguenot refugees, some Germans and Portuguese, and the remainder is a strange medley of Hottentot, Bantu, Malay, and Negro elements. In North Africa Egypt has become infiltrated with Greeks, Italians, Frenchmen, and Englishmen during the last two generations, and Algeria with Frenchmen. In North America the change has been most striking, from a sparse Indian population of hunters into that of the present inhabitants of the United States and Canada; the former of these, with its total of fifty millions inhabitants, already contains more than forty-three millions of whites, chiefly of English origin; that is more of European blood than is to be found in any one of the five great European kingdoms of England, France, Italy, Germany, and Austria, and less than that of Russia alone. The remainder are chiefly black, the descendants of slaves imported from Africa. In the Dominion of Canada, with its much smaller population of four millions, there has been a less, but still a complete, swamping of the previous Indian element by incoming whites. In South America, and thence upwards to Mexico inclusive, the population has been infiltrated in some parts and transformed in others, by Spanish blood and by that of the Negroes whom they introduced, so that not one half of its population can be reckoned as of pure Indian descent.
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
230 of 305
Next page End
206 galton.org 206 Inquiries into Human Faculty The West Indian Islands have had their population absolutely swept away since the time of the Spanish Conquest, except in a few rare instances, and African Negroes have been substituted for them. Australia and New Zealand tell much the same tale as Canada. A native population has been almost extinguished in the former and is swamped in the latter, under the pressure of an immigrant population of Europeans, which is now twelve times as numerous as the Maories. The time during which this great change has been effected is less than that covered by three generations. To this brief -sketch of changes of population in very recent periods, I might add the wave of Arab admixture that has extended from Egypt and the northern provinces of Africa into the Soudan, and that of the yellow races of China, who have already made their industrial and social influence felt in many distant regions, and who bid fair hereafter, when certain of their peculiar religious fancies shall have fallen into decay, to become one of the most effective of the colonising nations, and who may, as I trust, extrude hereafter the coarse and lazy Negro from at least the metaliferous regions of tropical Africa. It is clear from what has been said, that men of former generations have exercised enormous influence over the human stock of the present day, and that the average humanity of the world now and in future years is and will be very different to what it would have been if the action of our forefathers had been different. The power in man of varying the future human stock vests a great responsibility in the hands of each fresh generation, which has not yet been recognised at its just importance, nor deliberately employed. It is foolish to fold the hands and to say that nothing can be done, inasmuch as social forces and self-interests are too strong to be resisted. They need not be resisted; they can be guided. It is one thing to check the course of a huge steam vessel by the shock of a sudden encounter when she is going at full speed in the wrong direction, and another to cause her to change her course slowly and gently by a slight turn of the helm.
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
231 of 305
Next page End
galton.org 207 Population 207 Nay, a ship may be made to describe a half circle, and to end by following a course exactly opposite to the first, without attracting the notice of the passengers. POPULATION. Over-population and its attendant miseries may not improbably become a more serious subject of consideration than it ever yet has been, owing to improved sanatation and consequent diminution of the mortality of children, and to the filling up of the spare places of the earth which are still void and able to receive the overflow of Europe. There are no doubt conflicting possibilities which I need not stop to discuss. The check to over-population mainly advocated by Malthus is a prudential delay in the time of marriage; but the practice of such a doctrine would assuredly be limited, and if limited it would be most prejudicial to the race, as I have pointed out in Hereditary Genius but may be permitted to do so again. The doctrine would only be followed by the prudent and self-denying; it would be neglected by the impulsive and self-seeking. Those whose race we especially want to have, would leave few descendants, while those whose race we especially want to be quit of, would crowd the vacant space with their progeny, and the strain of population would thenceforward be just as pressing as before. There would have been a little relief during one or two generations, but no permanent increase of the general happiness, while the race of the nation would have deteriorated. The practical application of the doctrine of deferred marriage would therefore lead indirectly to most mischievous results, that were overlooked owing to the neglect of considerations bearing on race. While criticising the main conclusion to which Malthus came, I must take the opportunity of paying my humble tribute of admiration to his great and original work, which seems to me like the rise of a morning star before a day of free social investigation. There is nothing whatever in his book that would be in the least offensive to this generation, but he wrote in advance of his time and consequently roused virulent attacks,
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

http://galton.org/books/human-faculty/text...

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

-- RACIST 'blackWhiteHater#1'.... 'blackHebrewIsraelite' deacon of kingJames'WhiteVersions'...disrespects me

....'blackIsraelite'....respects BIA 'whiteMan' steveAdam....who WHIPS him ABOVE with racistNONSENSE....

"....Boby, So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

Is not is not the subject matter of this blog and you took off with the LIE Steven told you, WOW!!!...."

Saturday, April 16th 2016 at 5:16PM
Deacon Ron Gray

*************************************************************

you, racistlyIgnorant BELIEVER

1.......steve/Adam has gone by MANY biaNAMES.....yet you call him ..... europeanENGLISH PROPER....STEVEN
2.......I for my BIA commentary.....am only ROBERT POWELL......NEVER boby/bobby/yellowMellow

YOU, dumbARSE negroSlaves of 'WHITE SUPREMACY'

YOU, are the ONLY reason ..... the onlyREASON.....you hate YOURSELF, your 'blackSelf'

.....'black'People to 'white'People........ is 'blackCOMEDY'
.....'black'People to 'white'People........ is 'blackMAGIC..'
.....'black'People to 'white'People........ is 'blackCRIME..'
.....'black'People to 'white'People........ is 'blackGRASS..'

ALL THIS started in

.............Maafa21 PART 1492 and CONTINUES in Maafa21 PART 2016

'blackHebrewIsraelite' .... 'whiteMan' steveAdam ... STOP your RACISTLY IGNORANT FRAUD

Steven,

Since you decided to take MAAFA 21 part 1 discussion outside of this venue, then what is your point about Frances Galton?

Ron, you said Francis Galton coined the term eugenics, and that he and Darwin were birds of a feather. He did, and they were. I put up two sections from his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development, to prove it.

However, the video is wrong that his family made their money from slavery and that he only spoke against it after slavery ended. His family were Quakers and gun makers, and he spoke against slavery in 1857 in the very letter the video first quoted.

I insist on something more than sound bites Ron.

President Obama perpetuates the race problem, as does Hillary, Bernie, and all good Democratics. Until you get rid of the race question on the Census and other forms, such as my gun permit, you will have the race problem. Remember, it was the Census that gave us three-fifths of a person.

As of 2010 they are still counting "Negro".

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

We must welcome the future, remembering that soon it will be the past; and we must respect the past, remembering that it was once all that was humanly possible.

George Santayana

*************************************************

Until you get rid of the race question on the Census and other forms, such as my gun permit, you will have the race problem. Remember, it was the Census that gave us three-fifths of a person.
Tuesday, April 19th 2016 at 3:47AM
Steve Williams

As of 2010 they are still counting "Negro".
Tuesday, April 19th 2016 at 3:51AM
Steve Williams

**********************************************************

no, NO an NO NO.....bia'WhiteMan' steveAdam etalDeacon..... stop changing History/Scholarship and Science

..... it was NOT the CENSUS that gave America "..three-fifths of a person.."Negro"

"..three-fifths of a person.."Negro" is from THE CONSTITUTION and the American paganChristian slaverSYSTEM...

----- IT WAS quakingPaganChristians from racistlyIgnorant Europe that gave America THE CONSTITUTION......and the Spanish "negro" or negerino....

Steven,

You are trying your best to sanitize these thugs who set forth the ideas which perpetuate racism to this very day. Take a look at what Charles Darwin 1890 said and who he calls :"THE SAVAGE RACE".

“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world… The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state… and some ape as ow as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla.”

This man has set the tone that fed racism throughout the world encouraged people like this his cousin Frances Galton.

The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873” Steven, what do you think FRANCIS GALTON was talking about?

That was the question I asked you earlier and got no reply but yet you LIED and said the you have answered all of my questions.

Steven you can not whitewash this stain of racism that set forth the 19th and the 20th centuries. You call these sound bites but these quotes from these two thugs and Hoodlums was the words who inspired one man who killed millions with this kind of thinking to his perfect solution to get rid of his perceived the so-called "THE SAVAGE RACE" and his name was HITLER.

Please don't tell me that event in history did not happen.

Steven, I am still waiting on you to answer the above question.

The United States Census is a decennial census mandated by Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which states: "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States ... according to their respective Numbers ... . The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years."[1][2]

What do I think Galton was talking about Ron? I'm still reading what he said. You apparently have long since finished.

This is quote right here: "The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873” Steven, what do you think FRANCIS GALTON was talking about?

Focus your attention on this quote and tell me what do you think FRANCIS GALTON was talking about?

I'm not going to focus any attention on your sound bite Ron.

That is not my sound bite Steven but a quote that is contributed to Francis GALTON legacy. I hope that you are not blaming me for GALTON history are you?

The subject is Eugenics, is it not Ron? Tell me what Galton said about eugenics, what he said was meant by it. Can you do that Ron?

You are not slick Steven. It was you who posted all of this information about this THUG, FRANCIS GALTON in your attempt to side step my question to you about GALTON. Now you are running from my question to you about this quote:

"The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873”

By you trying to reverse this same question back at me said volumes. Do you really think that I possess that little intellect to see what you have done?

Ron, Galton was an Englishman and his motivation for eugenics was to improve the English race. The quote you keep referencing was from a letter to the times proposing that the Chinese would do better in Africa than the Africans. It is a Victorian, imperial, colonial attitude, but had nothing to do with the "negro problem" in American, and so the video producers were wrong to start off with Darwin and Galton. That's what I think.

One of these days I hope we can talk about race in America in 2016. Get rid of the census race question, get rid of the two party system. These are the two essential components of the present day race problem in America.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

and Master Steven scolds the negro 'blackVoice' ..'savageRace'....'blackHebrewIsraelite' with 'WhiteSupremacy'

--------Cousin of Darwin and his masterRacist belief......Sir FRANCIS GALTON

Sir FRANCIS GALTON....scientist of the kingJamesVersion.....shield of paganRacist thought......wrote.....

".....The best form of civilization in respect to the improvement of the race, would be one in which society was not costly; where incomes were chiefly derived from professional sources, and not much through inheritance; where every lad had a chance of showing his abilities, and, if highly gifted, was enabled to achieve a first-class education and entrance into professional life, by the liberal help of the exhibitions and scholarships which he had gained in his early youth; where marriage was held in as high honour as in ancient Jewish times; where the pride of race was encouraged (of course I do not refer to the nonsensical sentiment of the present day, that goes under that name); where the weak could find a welcome and a refuge in celibate monasteries or sisterhoods, and lastly, where the better sort of emigrants and refugees from other lands were invited and welcomed, and their descendants naturalised....."

deacon.....Again.....your 'blackHebrewIsraelite' RACIST beliefs are

-------Why...." Black People Hate Black People So Much?.."

"Black People" are REFERENCERS ONLY of paganEuropean racistIgnorance NOT African Asian Recorded Intelligence

Robert,

Steven got you so messed up in your thinking, you think that this blog is about Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much. The sad part about that is you have fallen right into Stevens BULL💩 and this blog is not about that subject at all..

Robert, you can't be accurate in your assessment of this blog without viewing the material in MAAFA21 part 1 of 13 as a starting point to be on point of this conversation...

First of all Steven being an Englishman is a nationality and not a race, Englishman are Caucasians, that STEVEN IS THE FIRST LIE IN THIS SIRIES OF LIES THAT YOU ARE TELLING. Now lets us look at this quote:

"The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873”

Look at what you are saying man. Why did you refuse to answer my question if this is what you thought in the first place?

YOUR WORDS: The quote you keep referencing was from a letter to the times proposing that the Chinese would do better in Africa than the Africans.

FRANCIS GALTON, was not talking about or mention anything about the Chinese would do better in Africa than the Africans., where in that quote do you see a CHINESE in that quote? THAT IS LIE NUMBER TWO!

Think about what this explanation is saying. Now what FRANCIS GALTON did say is that The Average Negroes possess too little intellect and need help being a respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support. Now I wonder who’s help would that come from?

YOUR WORDS: It is a Victorian, imperial, colonial attitude, but had nothing to do with the "negro problem" in American, and so the video producers were wrong to start off with Darwin and Galton. That's what I think.

I can understand this coming from a person who is trying to convince me that FRANCIS GALTON was talking about the CHINESE, when clearly in this quote FRANCIS GALTON was referring to this: The average Negroes possess too little intellect, , and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873”

is this what you think too, Steven?

See if you can find your quote here Ron.

http://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chine...

Am I wasting my time pointing you to primary sources Ron? If you'd paid attention to what I've posted you'd know how Darwin and Galton used the word race. Not the way you use it. Damn.

Overview of Race and Hispanic
Origin: 2010
2010 Census Briefs

http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/...

The 2010 census race question is way more offensive than Galton.

They want to slice you and dice you. That's the Maafa.

Navigation bar
Home Start Previous page
61 of 305
Next page End
galton.org 39 Character 39 CHARACTER. The fundamental and intrinsic differences of character that exist in individuals are well illustrated by those that distinguish the two s*xes, and which begin to assert themselves even in the nursery, where all the children are treated alike. One notable peculiarity in the character of the woman is that she is capricious and coy, and has less straightforwardness than the man. It is the same in the female of every s*x about the time of pairing, and there can be little doubt as to the origin of the peculiarity. If any race of animals existed in whom the s*xual passions of the female were as quickly and as directly stirred as those of the male, each would mate with the first who approached her, and one essential condition of s*xual selection would be absent. There would be no more call for competition among the males for the favour of each female; no more fighting for love, in which the strongest male conquers; no more rival display of personal charms, in which the best-looking or best-mannered prevails. The drama of courtship, with its prolonged strivings and doubtful success, would be cut quite short, and the race would degenerate through the absence of that s*xual selection for which the protracted preliminaries of love-making give opportunity. The willy-nilly disposition of the female in matters of love is as apparent in the butterfly as in the man, and must have been continuously favoured from the earliest stages of animal evolution down to the present time. It is the factor in the great theory of s*xual selection that corresponds to the insistence and directness of the male. Coyness and caprice have in consequence become a heritage of the s*x, together with a cohort of allied weaknesses and petty deceits, that men have come to think venial and even amiable in women, but which they would not tolerate among themselves. Various forms of natural character and temperament would no doubt be found to occur in constant proportions among any large group of persons of the same race, but what those proportions may be has never yet been investigated. It is extremely difficult to estimate it by observations of adults, owing to their habit of restraining natural ill
http://www.purepage.com Previous page Top Next page

Steven, you never did answer my question and I know for a FACT that you will not as you try to white-wash the pure beginnings of eugenics and the failed attempts at the perfect solution to what have been knowns as “THE NEGRO DILEMMA in this country by the elite.”

Even in this paragraph, it makes no mention of the CHINESE, as you try another path to stand by your convictions.

I have asked you to stay on topic many times now but the more you get off topic the more facetious and inane you get. Now you want to talk about the preliminaries of love-making given the opportunity.

WOW!!! I see why many on this site have lost faith in what you say. WOW!!!

You are running really hard now and we are just on MAAFA21 Part 1 of 13... WOW!!!

Unfortunately Ron, we are stuck at part 1.

Speak for yourself Steven, I am not stuck at part 1 because I am very clear on the issue at hand. Both CHARLES DARWIN AND FRANCIS GALTON introduce to the modern day world misguided scientific racism which was carried out by HITLER to eliminate there eugenics movement problem and in that case, it was the Khazar who have converted themselves into Judaism.

So, I will go forth with this discovery without, since you are bogged down with a few LIES that you told but that CHINESE in Africa LIE, topped the cake, WOW!!!

So you stay stuck Steven because you can't stop this truth of this hidden agenda that is keeping The Maafa well and alive to this very day...

/*
Nixon Invented War!
By
JoshuaJadon
http://ghostowlattic.tumblr.com/post/14151...

Reposted
By
Gregory V. Boulware, Esq.
http://blackhistory.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?i...
http://blackhistory.com/content/289263/i-c...
~ "SANKOFA" the "MAAFA" ~
http://blackhistory.com/content/273292/maa...

Invented War On Drugs to Suppress ‘Anti-War Left and Black People’
Dan Baum, writing in support of drug legalization at Harper’s, has unleashed a frank 1994 quote from former Nixon policy advisor John Ehrlichman, and as inadvertently salient an argument for legalizing drugs as any I’ve ever seen:

At the time, I was writing a book about the politics of drug prohibition. I started to ask Ehrlichman a series of earnest, wonky questions that he impatiently waved away. “You want to know what this was really all about?” he asked with the bluntness of a man who, after public disgrace and a stretch in federal prison, had little left to protect. “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

I must have looked shocked. Ehrlichman just shrugged. Then he looked at his watch, handed me a signed copy of his steamy spy novel,The Company, and led me to the door.

...Finally Admitted The Truth!
http://ghostowlattic.tumblr.com/post/14151...
http://joshuajadon.tumblr.com/
>
http://blackhistory.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?i...
https://twitter.com/#!/AuthorBoulwareG
https://independent.academia.edu/GregoryVB...
http://blackisms.com/education-2/
http://www.BoulwareEnterprises.com
*/

An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy is a 1944 study of race relations authored by Swedish Nobel-laureate economist Gunnar Myrdal and funded by Carnegie Corporation of New York. The foundation chose Myrdal because it thought that as a non-American, he could offer a more unbiased opinion. Myrdal's volume, at nearly 1,500 pages, painstakingly detailed what he saw as obstacles to full participation in American society that American Negroes faced as of the 1940s. Ralph Bunche served as Gunnar Myrdal's main researcher and writer at the start of the project in the Fall of 1938.[1]

It sold over 100,000 copies and went through 25 printings before going into its second edition in 1965. It was enormously influential in how racial issues were viewed in the United States, and it was cited in the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case "in general." The book was generally positive in its outlook on the future of race relations in America, taking the view that democracy would triumph over racism. In many ways it laid the groundwork for future policies of racial integration and affirmative action.[1]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_America...

I see that you still want to go off topic again. This blog is not about An American Dilemma, it is about THE NEGRO DILEMMA which the elite thought there prefect solution would be found in EUGENICS.

Gunnar Myrdal is cited in YOUR posted video as a EUGENICIST Ron. How is that off topic?

Your video producers are looking suspect. 1500 pages and they quoted just a couple sentences that suited their purpose. All from chapter seven, "Population". It starts at minute 38 in the full video link I posted. Probably part 3 or 4 in your list. I guess you didn't take note.

As you can see, I focused on the title difference, American Dilemma vs THE NEGRO DILEMMA in this crusade of yours to decontaminate, sanitize, water down the efforts of the elites to sponsor and support the elimination of The Negro through the science of EUGENICS.

It is the stupidity of man to think that he can do evil, even some monstrous evil and it won’t have any backlash on himself but of course someone who works that way and the moment he or she figures that out he starts looking for a way to avoid the repercussions of what he has done. This is what happened with slavery in the early 1800’s.

See Steven, the title of The American Dilemma tens to put the blame for EUGENICS, on a larger scale, when in fact, it was a smaller number of the rich families, the elite, corporations who founded the EUGENICS program to rectify the problem they saw with 4 million former slaves as now being equal under the law, which was called THE NEGRO DILEMMA.

The title of the book the video producers quoted from is An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, and that is a historical fact. The elites aren't the problem Ron, it's the masses whose only "education" is by "video".

As far as some who have lost faith in me, that's their problem not mine. It's been explained to me by others on this site who do have faith in me.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

and Master Steven scolds the negro 'blackVoice' ..'savageRace'....'blackHebrewIsraelite' with 'WhiteSupremacy'

".....The elites aren't the problem Ron, it's the masses whose only "education" is by "video". ....."

Thursday, April 21st 2016 at 7:31AM
Steve Williams

***********************************************but the negroMind of 'whiteMan' steveAdam SCOLDS me...?.....

"....Robert, Steven got you so messed up in your thinking, you think that this blog is about Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much...... Stevens BULL💩 and this blog is not about that subject .........

Robert, you can't be accurate in your assessment of this blog without viewing the material in MAAFA21 part 1 of 13 as a starting point........"

Wednesday, April 20th 2016 at 8:57AM
Deacon Ron Gray

**********************************************************************

the 'blackHebrewIsraelite'.....as HIS MASTER steveAdam writes......cannot READ or UNDERSTAND the only Language Master taught SLAVE....English.....and is VISUAL with NONSENSE videos

---YET, has to use a TITLE, SUBJECT to introduce the 'video UNEDUCATED masses whose only "education" is "video".

*******************************************

Maafa 1-13-------Maafa 21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America (Part 1 of 13)

----------(Holocaust of Enslavement, or Black holocaust) are terms used to describe the history and ongoing effects of atrocities.

The Maafa includes the Arab and Atlantic slave trades, and continued through imperialism, colonialism, and other forms of oppression to the present day.

GENOCIDE and HOLOCAUST ...... these words are the WORST of paganChristian Africa Asia Policy

------mean 'blackWhiteREdYellow' .....paganChristian RACISTLY IGNORANT ... HATE ... LOATHING ...

AND

Maafa ....... 1-13... to INFINITY of MISCONCEPTION..and FRAUD...'whiteSupremist' paganEUROPEAN NONSENSE

--------there NEVER, ever..NONE... was an "ARAB"......INVOLVEMENT, in slaverAmericana 1492-1864(1964)

THAT Hate, THAT Evil, THAT RAPE, THAT Torture was ALL, was ALL paganChristian EUROPEAN>..........

-----STOP this NONSENSE fraud GIVEN to the SLAVE by the europeanPAGAN Christian of SLAVERAMERICANA

-----STOP this NONSENSE fraud GIVEN to the SLAVE by ELITES of..... "American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy......"

STOP your RACIST enabling of olde......pagan europeanMADNESS...................

Have a look Ron.

https://books.google.com/books?vid=978-1-5...

At least look through the table of contents Ron.

See Steven, as it looks like the end of slavery might be on the horizon, white Americans started to be concerned about that a day of reckoning was coming. The primary fear for the average person was a retribution and insurrection and that was a reasonable fear, after all it’s illogical to think that you can do a whole group of people, what was done to the Black American and think that they will just take it lying down forever. See Steven, all of this is base in FEAR and the fabrication in the mind of evil men.

As far as the elites aren't the problem, as long as slavery was the law of the land, those few was making money and obtaining wealth and power in this country but as soon as it looked like the slaves would be free, in order for them to continue to maintain that power, was to pedal fear, terror, anxiety, horror, and panic among the lower classes of whites in this country, which gave birth to hate groups like the:

Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Christian Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Crusader Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Dixie Rangers Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, East Coast Knights Of The True Invisible Empire, Fort Christmas Knights Ku Klux Klan, Fraternal White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, International Keystone Knights of the Ku Klan Klan Inc., Knights Party Veterans League, Ku Klos Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Mystic Knights Of The Ku Klux Klan, New Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, North Mississippi White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Order Of The Confederate, Soldiers Of the Cross Training Institute, Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, United Klans of America, United Northern and Southern Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, United White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, White Camelia Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, all of which was born out of despair that marked the end of slavery, and this to was the white man solution to spark FEAR to this very day as THE NEGRO DILEMMA CONTINUES.

STEVEN I can go on and on listing such groups like all of The Neo-Naz, White nationalist, Racist skinheads, Neo-Confederate and Anti-Muslim groups like Aggressive Christianity[, The American Defence League, Bare Naked Islam, Radio Jihad just to name a of those hate white groups.

By the way Thanks for this link, this link only mentioned broth control and not EUGENICS, their is a difference.

You've asked me more than a couple times Ron, "why are you here?"

Why Are You Concerned About Black America:
Because the truth of Black history has been obscured.

Thanks for leading me to, An American Dilemma.

Steven,

Here's what I see, through THE NEGRO DILEMMA CONTINUES. Steven at that time SLAVERY or the loss profit was so devastating to the elite, that started using code words like raising of TAXES. Remember for the wealthy elite their fears went way beyond things like insurrection, they were worried about the financial impact. Remember again, it was not just the cotton plantations that would loss profit from the end of slavery, you are also talking about the banks, the Insurance companies, the railroads even the newspapers. The FACT is that every aspect of white American economy was at some level or another invested in slavery, major business had their hand in the slave trade and the promotion of slavery in this country.

BOBBY,

The only way you are to know the material is to read it or view it, their is no other way. If you have been following the comments between Steven and myself, I have been taken note of MAAFA21 and the history of how EUGENICS, came about in history.

We need to recognize in that period of time that for the wealthy elite that Steven, are trying to protect, knows to control this system, slaves were a asset as long as they were Slaves but at the moment they are set free, the slaves became a liability and what the elite knew was that the of slavery would instantly release 4 million people into the economy, 4 million people, who had been kept uneducated and effectively unemployable anywhere but the cotton field. Now what they was concern about was the American economy going bankrupt. They were looking for taxes to go through the roof too take care of the people, to crime was going be rampant, prisons were to be flooded, there’s gonna be this population overrunning and leaving for the North. For the north was the fear of migration from the south of these black people.

BOBBY,

The only way you are to know the material is to read it or view it, their is no other way. If you have been following the comments between Steven and myself, I have been taken note of MAAFA21 and the history of how EUGENICS, came about in history.

We need to recognize in that period of time that for the wealthy elite that Steven, are trying to protect, knows to control this system, slaves were a asset as long as they were Slaves but at the moment they are set free, the slaves became a liability and what the elite knew was that the of slavery would instantly release 4 million people into the economy, 4 million people, who had been kept uneducated and effectively unemployable anywhere but the cotton field. Now what they was concern about was the American economy going bankrupt. They were looking for taxes to go through the roof too take care of the people, to crime was going be rampant, prisons were to be flooded, there’s gonna be this population overrunning and leaving for the North. For the north was the fear of migration from the south of these black people.

I'm taking a sabbatical Ron, thanks again.

Steven, I understand, you really need to go on sabbatical after a series of LIES you told. The first one was trying to float this one pass me, that a Englishman was a race of people.

Now this one was the highlight of the day. YOUR WORDS: The quote you keep referencing was from a letter to the times proposing that the Chinese would do better in Africa than the Africans, to this quote: "The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873”

That was the best laugh I had that day, Thank You Steven. Enjoy your sabbatical.

As Steven leaves the scene, I will continue to share my notes on this subject MAAFA21 Part 1-13

NEGRO AND THE STAVE TRADE

I do not join in the belief that, the African is our equal in brain or in heart and I believe that, if we can in any fairway possessor ourselves of his service, we have an equal right to utilize them to our advantage… FRANCIS GALTON 1850.

Now FRANCIS GALTON was known as the father of EUGENICS, he was the one who actually coined the phrase EUGENICS. So he believed in trying to increase those, he felt were superior in stock and decrease those people who he felt was inferior. FRANCIS GALTON came from a very wealthy family, a family who made its wealth from the slave trade. What a lot of people don’t know is that FRANCIS GALTON was a cousin of Charles Darwin. FRANCIS GALTON took Charles Darwin’s philosophy, ideas and thoughts and put them into practice, that is what we know today as EUGENICS.

EUGENICS and evolution are related in that they both see and consider what they see the highest form of primates, such as the guerilla, as almost indistinguishable from what they consider the lowest form of human, the African and the Aborigine.

/*
...“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people!"

"What a lot of people don’t know is that FRANCIS GALTON was a cousin of Charles Darwin. FRANCIS GALTON took Charles Darwin’s philosophy, ideas and thoughts and put them into practice!"

"We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

"I do not join in the belief that, the African is our equal in brain or in heart and I believe that, if we can in any fairway possessor ourselves of his service, we have an equal right to utilize them to our advantage…"
-FRANCIS GALTON 1850.-

Right On Brother Deacon! You Tell It Like It Is! ...TEACH BROTHER TEACH!

It's Up To Those Who Believe In "The Awakening" To Wake Up and Do Something To Curtail The Attempted Murder and Murders of Our Innocents and Law-Abiding Proud and Respectable Black Folk as well as Those of Color! "The journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step...VOTE! ...VOTE WITH PRIDE AND TRUTH IN THOSE WHO WOULD REPRESENT YOU, YOUR NEEDS, AND THOSE OF A UNIFIED AND INCLUSIVE SOCIETY!

Now, I wonder how many of us are truly listing (reading) and getting the point to what we have been trying to convey to the MASSES? Will they (we know about the ones in the wood-pile) now go out and vote for the people who truly hate them (us), who truly want to see them (us) eliminated; destroyed and wiped of the face of the Earth?

I think NOT!

Brother Deacon, I thank you for keeping up the good work and fighting the "Big Fight!" Lord knows, we'e had our share of those who say they like us, care for us, work with us, represent us when they truly do not! ...All that yet you can't live next door to them, hang out with them or their kids, and you especially better not even think about hugging thier wife or marrying their daughter! ...But equality and integration is the key right?

Posers Are as Posers Do... White-Washing The Truth to Suit Their Manufactured Truth...and we are supposed to believe it.

I'm not naming names or pointing at any particular individual(s), but "the put is in the putting, while "if the shoe fits," "It's In The Paper(s), so it must be true!"

In Pride, Truth, Justice, Peace, and Love,

'G'
https://twitter.com/#!/AuthorBoulwareG

~ "SANKOFA" the "MAAFA" ~
*/

Esquire (British English: /ɪˈskwaɪə/;[1] American English: /ˈɛsˌkwaɪr/, /ɛˈskwaɪr/ or /ɪˈskwaɪr/;[2] abbreviated Esq.)[3] is usually a courtesy title.

In the United Kingdom, Esquire historically was a title of respect accorded to men of higher social rank, below the rank of knight and above the rank of gentleman. It later came to be used as a general courtesy title for any man in a formal setting, usually as a suffix to his name, as in "John Smith, Esq.", with no precise significance.[4][5] In certain formal contexts, it remains an indication of a social status that is recognised in the formal Order of Precedence.[6] Esquire is similar to the word squire, which in medieval times meant an apprentice to a knight.

In the United States, Esquire is mostly used to denote a lawyer; in a departure from traditional use, it is used irrespective of gender, with women using the title as well as men. In letters, a lawyer is customarily addressed by adding the suffix Esquire (abbreviated Esq.), preceded by a comma, after the lawyer's full name.[7]

Steven,

This topic is about MAAFA21 and not about Esquire, why are you trying this weak attempt to change this subject?

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

and Master Steven scolds the negro 'blackVoice' .."Espuire"...'blackHebrewIsraelite' .

"......Thanks for leading me to, An American Dilemma....."

Thursday, April 21st 2016 at 11:24AM
Steve Williams

***************************

--------and slaveEducated 'deacon' of 'blackWhiteHebrews of the World" ... Retards history with

".....as long as slavery was the law of the land......elite that Steven, are trying to protect, knows to control this system, slaves were a asset as long as they were Slaves ....."

Thursday, April 21st 2016 at 1:02PM
Deacon Ron Gray

*********************************************

History, Scholarship and Science show that slaverAmericana 1776-1864(1964) ..... The Generational rape, Torture, miseducation and Murder of the African Asian by the paganChrisitan europeanRacists.....

... "the American Dilema" WAS, and STILL is a RELIGIOUS product of the kingJamesVersion of Africa Asia

... "the American Dilema" WAS, and STILL is a RELIGIOUS product of European CREATIONISM

... "the American Dilema" WAS, and STILL is a RELIGIOUS product of their UNDERSTANDING of the Creator.....

Don't leave out this: ... "the American Dilema" WAS, and STILL is a RELIGIOUS product of The Islamic/Arabic conversion of Africa Asia.

Robert, Did you see any of the 13 parts in this series of MAAFA21?

Here's a quote from my notes for your review: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized race of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world… The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state… and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla…” CHARLES DARWIN 1890

You are a Negro or a Black American, How do you feel about being compared to a savage or a baboon or a gorilla? There is no religion here!!!

I didn't change the subject Ron. You and the "peace and love" guy did that.

"HOW"

Words like liar, demon, infiltrator, poser... Why not just say Machiavellian and leave it at that? Or White Boy, take your pick. BTW, which kind of Esquire is "someone-not-naming-names"?

Now Steven, you have been busted for lying on several occasions here on this blog. Do you claim to be a poser? Do you have a guilty conscience, when no names have been mentioned? I wonder why you feel like a suspect, if the description do not fit you? Are your emotions getting the best of you on this subject? Then stop trying to push that Bull, that a English Man is a race of people or YOUR WORDS: Ron,

The quote you keep referencing was from a letter to the times proposing that the Chinese would do better in Africa than the Africans. It is a Victorian, imperial, colonial attitude, but had nothing to do with the "negro problem" in American, and so the video producers were wrong to start off with Darwin and Galton. That's what I think.

Are you realizing that your thinking is wrong?

I don't need to call you Machiavellian or White Boy, Steven will do just fine for me, Thank You.

I'm not emotional Ron, but if it comes down to trading insults instead of talking about the issues, I can do that.

Let us get back to the topic of Maafa21 PART 1 of 13. In my notes we left off with the quote of CHARLES DARWIN 1890 as this man of science compared Negro's or a Black American to savages or a baboon or a gorilla.

Did you know that CHARLES DARWIN had wrote a longer original book and that title was THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES by means of Natural Selection or THE PRESERVATION OF FAVORITE RACES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE?

Some might defend FRANCIS GALTON because he eventually rejects slavery but they do point out that all of his wealth was derived from the slave trade but it also needs to be known that he as well as others EUGENICS, did not reject slavery until after it had ended and they could not any longer exploit blacks legally. So at that point it would have been quite easy for him and his cohorts to reject slavery. I think this, at appoint that we all have to really realize that the EUGENICS movement was not invented by the everyday average White American but by a select group of wealthy white elites that had used this tool of an ideology to pit all of White America against Black America. So we see that this is truly the case, up until this day.

The title says "favored" races, not "favorite". Races applies to any animal race, not just humans. Races as applies to humans means not just negroid, caucasian, and mongoloid, but any identifiable race, such as the English race. Favored means favored by natural selection. You wouldn't know this because you don't want to read and understand. Galton's family didn't make their money in the slave trade because the were Quakers, gunsmiths, and bankers. I don't care if you don't want to do the research but there is no point arguing with someone who won't do the research but only wants to whine and complain.

/*
DeaconRonMaafa21.PART1of13_4.23.16
http://blackinamerica.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi...

...Excuse me for just a moment Brother Deacon. It is not my intention to take this blogs conversation of subject. I wish to address this man once and for all...

Steve...my words were not intended to insult or bemoan any particular individual. I make it my business to speak only the TRUTH! You have more than once demonstrated your ability to mold yourself into the description of that which has been described as someone who despises our Black Culture and/or Black Intellectual Independence. Or do you have this inbred need to attack only me?

In such situations, we as Black Men, back in the day as well as currently, would take an insulting fella such as yourself and do something violent and nasty to him... I'm a wiser, older, and gentler guy these days. However, I maintain my manhood and self-pride in knowing who and what I am. My man, you'd better believe it and thank God that we are not face-to-face! You don't know me...and oh yes, I do not know you either! I can tell you that I hail from some of the toughest, baddest places on the planet - don't believe me? Ask someone who knows! ...You wouldn't want to have known me back in my street days buddy! ...We ate guys with visions of convoluted professionalistic sanctity for breakfast.

Now while it is none of your damned business how I address myself, your definition of 'Esquire' is just.

(Initial capital letter) an unofficial title of 'respect,' having no precise significance, sometimes placed, especially in its abbreviated form, after a man's surname in formal written address: in the U.S., usually applied to lawyers, women as well as men; in Britain, applied to a commoner considered to have gained the social position of a gentleman.
Abbreviation: Esq.

...For the edification of respectable readers and commentors on these particular networks, and My BROTHERS AND SISTERS, as well as My Good Friend's Brother Deacon Ron Gray and 'Mu'alim' Robert Powell:

While I am not an attorney or a person who serves below Knighthood...I am however, a Man, A Black Man who requires, demands, and has earned the 'Respect' of many who have considered the fact that I am a 'Gentleman' as well, not to mention my many published written contributions to this world society of ours. Two Men whom I hold in high esteem have honored me with the title of "Doctor!"

Brother Deacon and 'Mu'alim Robert Powell, My Sons and Grandsons carry my name...

Gregory S. Boulware, Sr.
Gregory S. Boulware, Jr. (there are two other sons who also have my name - Vernon)
Yes, there are three of us with the exception of our middle names... Now that makes me the one and only!
Gregory V. Boulware, Esq.

I do hope that clears up the reason for 'Esq.' behind my name!

Now, I also hope that this is the last time that I will have to communicate with you Steve. I have not blocked you from commenting on my postings because you have remained civil up to this point. I feel that you have not earned the position of respect that I once held for you. You do, however, deserve the respect that I would hold for anyone, plain and simple. Should you feel the need to voice clandestine phrases and under-lipped corrections of my diction, please don't; for I do not wish to look upon you in a hateful fashion like those you choose to support. If my posted words offend you, then they must be true... I hold a staunch hatred for white-supremacy! And you are also correct in stating "There is no point in arguing with someone who," in my opinion, hates and despises you and your people - (meaning, Me and Mine)!

Good-bye Steve!

Back on topic: Deacon, every injection of text that I've posted has addressed the issues and subject matter as described. The planned destruction of Black People by those whom we have mentioned are participants in that plan (not every single white person on Earth)...it's been proven over and over again with my well researched postings, written works, questions and comments. I, like You, know who the enemy is...

I once again thank you for allowing me to voice and/or address my concerns, personal and professional.

In Pride, Truth, Justice, Peace, and Love,

'G'
http://hbcu.com/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?id=641608

~ "SANKOFA" the "MAAFA" ~
*/

You have in fact called me personally, Greg, a demon, bigot, racist, infiltrator, and poser. Check your records.

I have no further use for the communication with or of someone who is a ‘poser.’ This being wishes to have me to become involved in time-wasting semantics while forgoing the industrious pontification of truth. Disciples of ‘Beelzebub’ and other components of "evil-doers" have no place in the enlightenment or gainful advancement of our people other than acquiring the knowledge of whom and/or what is ‘good’ and ‘evil.’ It is their natural ‘practicum’ to teach and practice hate and hateful things upon the face of the Earth, everywhere and every time they are opportune.

STEVEN,

YOUR WORDS: The title says "favored" races, not "favorite".

Steven, where did you get this "favored" from. The correct title to CHARLES DARWIN BOOK IS THIS: “THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES by means of Natural Selection or THE PRESERVATION OF FAVOURED RACES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE in my correction: HERE IS MORE PROOF https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/com... I have produced a photo copy of the original book cover for your review in order to stop this LIE of yours in it’s trackes.
Now Steven, where did you get this "favored" races from?

YOUR WORDS: Races applies to any animal race, not just humans. Races as applies to humans means not just negroid, caucasian, and mongoloid, but any identifiable race, such as the English race.

Steven, for the purpose of this blog “RACE” or a ethic group has always been about the biological taxonomy term for the sociological concept of humans. Now there was nowhere in this blog was I referring to animals and if you think I was, point out that reference point to me, can you do that?

Now on to this second part of your statement about the Races applies to any animal race, not just humans. Races as applies to humans means not just negroid, caucasian, and mongoloid, but any identifiable race, such as the English race.

Now my reply: The English race cars, boats, plains, horses, dog’s just to mention a few things but as far as The English being a race of people and not a nationality, you got to show me where you got that info from, can you do that on your next reply? See Steven, I know for a FACT that The English is a nationality simply because ethnic groups live there, just like here in America, this I have seen with my own eyes. Hey Steven, do being an Eye witness to this FACT, count as research?

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

Master Steven scolds the .....racistAPEING, kingJamesTHINKING/Believer.... 'blackHebrewIsraelite' ......

"....Races applies to any animal race...a demon, bigot, racist, infiltrator, and poser. Check your records....."

Saturday, April 23rd 2016 at 6:45AM
Steve Williams

**************************************

but LYIN, europeanRacist Apeing Fraud, False poser

Don't leave out this: ... "the American Dilema" WAS, and STILL is a RELIGIOUS product of The Islamic/Arabic conversion of Africa Asia..........not just negroid, caucasian, and mongoloid....."

Robert .............. my notes for your review: .... “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized race of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world… The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state… and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla…” CHARLES DARWIN 1890

You are a Negro or a Black American,

How do you feel about being compared to a savage or a baboon or a gorilla? There is no religion here!!! .."

Friday, April 22nd 2016 at 10:08AM
Deacon Ron Gray

**************************************************************

Again, for the 2,258,111,999,011th TIME.....to the LYIN, INSULTING....'blackHebrewIsraelite'

.....I, Robert Powell, am NOT OR EVER BEEN... identified by RACIST europeanPagans a NEGRO or 'blackAmerican'

NEGRO or 'blackAmerican'

.... whose GENESIS is in paganChristian RACISTLY IGNORANT europeanKingJamesISM

1. are APED englishTERMS BEGUN to INSULT the African Asian Recorded 4000+ History, Scholarship and Science

2. are BARBARIC evil, terms ADOPTED by slaves of slaverAmericana 1492-1864(1964) that are 'blackChristians'

3. are IGNORANT LYIN terms USED by colonized people of EUROPE 1492-1970+

4. My BELIEF, MY FAITH is the MONOTHEISTIC belief given to Adaam(as) from His Creator

ps.....

1. selfProfessed 'whiteMan' steveAdam is the ebolaRacist GENE of BIA

2. this deacon 'blackStatement'

---- "Don't leave out this: ... "the American Dilema" WAS, and STILL is a RELIGIOUS product of The Islamic/Arabic conversion of Africa Asia....."

IS a LYING, Evil Misconception

----------the Majority of the World..Africa Asia... Has BEEN Islaamic for the PAST 1500+ YEARS
----------AfricanAsia slaves of America 'converted' from AlIslaam to paganChristianity circa 1600-1800

3. selfProfessed 'blackHebrewIsraelite' is an APER of the racistlyIgnorant....antiIslaamic europeanRACIST race

You've got to be kidding Ron. Favoured vs. favored? I'll let you puzzle that one out. As regards race, as I said at the beginning, Darwin and Galton don't use the same way you do. Forget the Victorians. There is a whole fertile field for discussion in the book American Dilemma. Black American history that sheds light on all the issues you are concerned with. Written in fairly modern American English.

Steve,

The American Dilemma is not the topic of this blog MAAFA21 is and the material within it, is up for discussion.

I see that you could not reply to any of my questions to you like that Englishman race BUL. (LOL)

That's why I'm taking a Sabbatical Ron. I'll post my findings in the future. It is 1500 pages.

Why don't you start a blog with this 1500 page finding. Meanwhile, I will go ahead and share some more of my notes on the subject of MAAFA21.

"The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873”

EUGENICS of that time believe that Africans were inferior, not just mentally but physically and that left to themselves, left alone that the Slaves - Black Americans they would not make it, the problem then, it did not work. Now with that failure, The EUGENICS moved on to what is known as POSITIVE EUGENICS. The EUGENICS wanted the White population to reproduce, so they can have so many children that it would overwhelmed the black Population but that did not work either. Next the EUGENICS moved on to what they called NEGATIVE EUGENICS, they knew that they could not round up all the blacks in the nation and execute them, so they decided to create an environment where they would convince the blacks to severely limit the numbers of children they were going to have and thereby commit raced suicide.

Okay Ron, but what did Myrdal say about Eugenics?

And yes Ron, the plan is to post a blog. I read as much as Google preview provided and the two volumes will be here on Monday.

Great idea Steven, start a new blog...

Don't you even want to know on which page he talks about negative eugenics?

I know you do. It's page 176.

No! What you can do is direct your attention to the material covered in this blog for a change, OK!

"The chances of their children dying at any early age are much greater than those of other children. No social policy, however radically framed, would be able to lift the standards of these people immediately. The most direct way of meeting the problem, not taking account of the value premises in the American Creed, would be to sterilize them. The fact that most whites would want to decrease the Negro population--particularly the lower class Negroes--would strengthen the argument for sterilization of destitute Negroes.

"We find, however, that such proposals, if they are made at all, are almost as repugnant to the average white American in the South and the North as to the Negro. In general he is not inclined to consider sterilization as a means of birth control except to prevent the reproduction of the feeble-minded, the insane, and the severely malformed when a hereditary causation can be shown. Outside of those rare cases he is against sterilization even if entirely voluntary.

"For this he gives not only the reason that in many regions of the South the political and judicial system is such that, for Negroes and perhaps other poor people, a system of 'voluntary' sterilization might in practice turn out to be compulsory. His resistance goes deeper. He reacts against the idea that any individual, for reasons that have no biological but only social causes, should undergo an unnatural restriction of his procreative possibilities. Outside the narrow field of negative eugenics, sterilization is, therefore, excluded as a means of controlling fertility. Except for individual cases in which life or health is threatened by child-bearing, the average American takes a similar attitude toward induced abortion. In his opinion, life should not be extinguished."

That quote of information parallels my earlier thoughts that eugenics was not the plan of the average white American but the plan of the few or the elite and use racism as a tool it pit all whites against all blacks but that plan is not working neither.

The more MAAFA21 is exposed, the more people of middle and lower classes have in common both black and white. I have more notes to share soon.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

Master Steven has a 'whiteSupremist' enabling WITH the ENABLER of Francis Galton.... 'blackHebrewIsraelite' ......

******************************************************

"....Don't you even want to know on which page he talks about negative eugenics?...."

Saturday, April 23rd 2016 at 4:23PM
Steve Williams

**************************************

but

2016....FRANCIS GALTON........Example/Enabler....... 'blackHebrewIsraelite' writes....

"......The average Negroes possess too little intellect, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support…. FRANCIS GALTON, 1873....."

"...EUGENICS of that time believe that Africans were inferior.....EUGENICS wanted the White population to reproduce, so they can have so many children that it would overwhelmed the black Population but that did not work either. Next the EUGENICS moved on to what they called NEGATIVE EUGENICS.....MAAFA21....... common both black and white...........use racism as a tool it pit all whites against all blacks....."

Saturday, April 23rd 2016 at 2:10PM
Deacon Ron Gray

*********************************************************************

American Society IS and HAS changed with the Great Presidency of Baraaka Hussein Obama

....CHANGE...BOTH of you Stereotypical Misconceiving.....'blackWhite'/'whiteBlack' 'redYellow' paganChristians

Robert,

Have you seen this MAAFA21 video presentation?

Ron, speaking of the motivations of the upper classes, did you read the Forward by Frederick P. Keppel, of the Carnegie Corporation?

By the way Steven, you have double down on this: YOUR WORDS: Races as applies to humans means not just negroid, caucasian, and mongoloid, but any identifiable race, such as the English race.

Point to me your references to this English race point of yours, can you do that? I am very curious now.

No! is this material found in the MAAFA21 video presentation?

The absence of a criterion to distinguish between races and sub-races, and our ethnological ignorance generally, makes it impossible to offer more than a very off-hand estimate of the average variety of races in the different countries of the world. I have, however, endeavoured to form one, which I give with much hesitation, knowing how very little it is worth. I registered the usually recognised races inhabiting each of upwards of twenty countries, and who at the same time formed at least half per cent of the population. It was, I am perfectly aware, a very rough proceeding, so rough that for the United Kingdom I ignored the prehistoric types and accepted only the three headings of British, Low Dutch, and Norman-French. Again, as regards India I registered as follows :—Forest tribes (numerous), Dravidian (three principal divisions), Early Arian, Tartar (numerous, including Afghans), Arab, and lastly European, on account of their political importance, notwithstanding the fewness of their numbers. Proceeding in this off-hand way, and after considering the results, the broad conclusion to which I arrived was that on the average at least three different recognised races were to be found in every moderately-sized district on the earth’s surface.

My mistake Ron. I should have said, the British race.

Steven, it would be best for you to follow the material found in MAAFA 21 the video presentation, instead of trying to mislead and redirect this conversation to something that you have little concept of. Steven, that is what happens when you use those tools of the evil one, deception, trickery, running a scam, being dishonest but I admire your attempt to admit you was wrong in that English race of people BS.

Now follow my notes, as we move into MAAFA 21 part 2 of 13.

“ … even a cursory glance at the charts, photographs, and diagrams used to popularize EUGENIC ideals reveals that the unfit that the unfit were swarthy, black, and ugly by Anglo-Saxon standards, with flattened noses, wiry hair, and prognathous profiles.” Harriet Washington Author, Medical Apartheid

The white elitist in the early 20th century who made up the EUGENICS movement where no longer just philosophers and academics, now they were industrialist and billionaires who had to embrace the world view that was essentially identical to the eugenics movement. the same individuals and corporations who had once made millions on the back of slaves, were now willing to spend millions to get rid of them. Now that didn’t mean that these guys were interested in being public crusaders, for the EUGENICS movement, they were certainly willing to be the brains and the money behind it. They would hire crusaders to do the dirty work and the primary one they settle upon was a woman named MARGAET SANGER. MARGAET SANGER was the founder of the American Birth Control League and the publisher of its newsletter, The Birth Control Review.

So we're on to Margaret Sanger. Am I restricted to the propaganda bites in your movie?

In 1916, Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the United States, which led to her arrest for distributing information on contraception. Her subsequent trial and appeal generated controversy. Sanger felt that in order for women to have a more equal footing in society and to lead healthier lives, they needed to be able to determine when to bear children. She also wanted to prevent unsafe abortions, so-called back-alley abortions,[3] which were common at the time because abortions were usually illegal.[citation needed] She believed that while abortion was sometimes justified it should generally be avoided, and she considered contraception the only practical way to avoid the use of abortions.[4]

I see that you still want to white wash,and sanitize this conversation but if you use other sources please supply your reference points or links

Here's a link that will support what you call my propaganda bites about Margaret Sanger: Margaret Sanger Founder of Planned Parenthood

In Her Own Words "The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923) http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm

On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people

On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification," couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.

On the extermination of blacks:
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon

STEVEN you call it propaganda bites in your movie but I see this information reflecting the truth about who the Eugenics movement from the beginning was all about and Margaret Sanger is just one of the cogs in the wheel as we explore the truth about MAAFA 21and the Negro Dilemma, the extermination of blacks in this country.

I didn't say yet what I think about Sanger. But I do know that your video is propaganda as concerns Darwin, Galton, and apparently Myrdal. Of course I'll be reading Myrdal further. I didn't see much it part 2 about Sanger. Hitler I have no comment on because there is no controversy about him. They just seem to be blaming Americans for his ideas, which seems kind of bizarre.

The film repeats elements of an American conspiracy theory called black genocide, using many of the same arguments as black separatists such as the Black Panther Party in the early 1970s.[5][4][6][7][8][6] It misuses statistics to induce in the viewer a fear of birth control and abortion.[1][5] The film alleges that the eugenics movement targeted African Americans in the 19th and 20th centuries, that this was the basis for the creation of the American Birth Control League (now Planned Parenthood) by Margaret Sanger, and that this kind of race genocide continued in the form of the abortion-rights movement of the 20th and 21st centuries. The film puts forward the idea that Sanger was a racist who worked to reduce the population of blacks, and that Planned Parenthood is continuing this program.[5] Sanger is implicated as an ally of Nazism and Adolf Hitler.[4][9]

Woman, by virtue of motherhood is the regulator of the birthrate, the sacred disposer of human production. It is in the deliberate restraint and measurement of human production that the fundamental problems of the family, the nation, the whole brotherhood of mankind find their solution. The health and longevity of the individual, the economic welfare of the workers, the general level of culture of the community, the possibility of abolishing from the world the desolating scourge of war—all these like great human needs, depend, primarily and fundamentally, on the wise limitation of the human output. It does not certainly make them inevitable, but it renders them possible of accomplishment; without it they have been clearly and repeatedly proved to be impossible.

These facts have long been known to the few who view the world realistically. But it is not the few who rule the world. It is the masses—the ignorant, emotional, volatile, superstitious masses—who rule the world. It is they who choose the few supreme persons who manage or mismanage the world's affairs. Even the most stupid of us must be able to see how it is done now, for during recent years the whole process has been displayed before us on the very largest scale.

The lesson has not been altogether in vain. It is furnishing a new stimulus to those who are working for the increase of knowledge, and of practical action based on knowledge, among the masses, the masses who alone possess the power to change the force of the world for good or for evil, and by growth in wisdom to raise the human race on to a higher level.

http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/8660/p...

This problem comes home with peculiar force to the people of America. Do we want the millions of abortions performed annually to be multiplied? Do we want the precious, tender qualities of womanhood, so much needed for our racial development, to perish in these sordid, abnormal experiences? Or, do we wish to permit woman to find her way to fundamental freedom through safe, unobjectionable, scientific means? We have our choice. Upon our answer to these questions depends in a tremendous degree the character and the capabilities of the future American race.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

selfClaiming 'whiteMan' steveAdam SCOLDS his sireSlave.......SUB "Race".... 'blackHebrewIsraelite' ......

******************************************************

"......The absence of a criterion to distinguish between races and sub-races, and our ethnological ignorance generally, makes it impossible to offer more than a very off-hand estimate of the average variety of races in the different countries of the world. .........I ignored the prehistoric types and accepted only the three headings of British, Low Dutch, and Norman-French...... as regards India I registered as follows :

—Forest tribes (numerous), Dravidian (three principal divisions), Early Arian, Tartar (numerous, including Afghans), Arab,

and lastly European, on account of their political importance, notwithstanding the fewness of their numbers.

Proceeding in this off-hand way, and after considering the results, the broad conclusion to which I arrived was that on the average at least three different recognised races were to be found in every moderately-sized district on the earth’s surface. ...."

Sunday, April 24th 2016 at 5:41PM
Steve Williams

".......Robert, Have you seen this MAAFA21 video presentation? ....."

Sunday, April 24th 2016 at 9:15AM
Deacon Ron Gray

***********************************************************

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

selfClaiming 'whiteMan' steveAdam SCOLDS his sireSlave.......SUB "Race".... 'blackHebrewIsraelite' ......

******************************************************

"......The absence of a criterion to distinguish between races and sub-races, and our ethnological ignorance generally, makes it impossible to offer more than a very off-hand estimate of the average variety of races in the different countries of the world. .........I ignored the prehistoric types and accepted only the three headings of British, Low Dutch, and Norman-French...... as regards India I registered as follows :

—Forest tribes (numerous), Dravidian (three principal divisions), Early Arian, Tartar (numerous, including Afghans), Arab,

and lastly European, on account of their political importance, notwithstanding the fewness of their numbers.

Proceeding in this off-hand way, and after considering the results, the broad conclusion to which I arrived was that on the average at least three different recognised races were to be found in every moderately-sized district on the earth’s surface. ...."

Sunday, April 24th 2016 at 5:41PM
Steve Williams

****************************************************************

yet the slave of 'whiteSupremacy' 'blackHebrewIsraelite' ELEVATES the RACIST NONSENSE of 'whiteMan' steveAdam

".......Robert, Have you seen this MAAFA21 video presentation? ....."

Sunday, April 24th 2016 at 9:15AM
Deacon Ron Gray

***********************************************************

FIRST on YOUR TITLE and SUBJECT of 'video'-----ABORTION

ABORTION is an AMERICAN Evil of Promiscuity, Irresponsibility and LAZINESS

------It should NOT be an American Lawless Murder Story

AND offSUBJECT with you and your brotherRacist steveAdam.....

I am READING the TITLE of this blaggette, AND READING the scolding your Master Steven is giving you about his SUPERIOR 'Race' of "European......their political importance, notwithstanding the fewness of their numbers."

I, robertPowell, AM not a RACIST of the 'blackWhite'/'whiteBlack' pagan euroChristian Ignorant Race....

I am in the Race of the Family of Adaam(as) to complete the Suggestions of the Creator of Mankind......

-----yet you LOVE slaveMaster Steven and try to denniigggerrrate ME?

STOP your cottonField SUBSERVIANCE to RACIST Ignorance..........

CHAPTER III

THE MATERIALS OF THE NEW RACE

Each of us has an ideal of what the American of the future should be. We have been told times without number that out of the mixture of stocks, the intermingling of ideas and aspirations, there is to come a race greater than any which has contributed to the population of the United States. What is the basis for this hope that is so generally indulged in? If the hope is founded upon realities, how may it be realized? To understand the difficulties and the obstacles to be overcome before the dream of a greater race in America can be attained, is to understand something of the task before the women who shall give birth to that race.

What material is there for a greater American race? What elements make up our present millions? Where do they live? How do they live? In what direction does our national civilization bend their ideals? What is the effect of the "melting pot" upon the foreigner, once he begins to "melt"? Are we now producing a freer, juster, more intelligent, more idealistic, creative people out of the varied ingredients here?

Before we can answer these questions, we must consider briefly the races which have contributed to American population.

Among our more than 100,000,000 population are Negroes, Indians, Chinese and other colored people to the number of 11,000,000. There are also 14,500,000 persons of foreign birth. Besides these there are 14,000,000 children of foreign-born parents and 6,500,000 persons whose fathers or mothers were born on foreign soil, making a total of 46,000,000 people of foreign stock. Fifty per cent of our population is of the native white strain.

Of the foreign stock in the United States, the last general census, compiled in 1910, shows that 25.7 per cent was German, 14 per cent was Irish, 8.5 per cent was Russian or Finnish, 7.2 was English, 6.5 per cent Italian and 6.2 per cent Austrian. The Abstract of the same census points out several significant facts. The Western European strains in this country are represented by a majority of native-born children of foreign-born or mixed parentage. This is because the immigration from those sources has been checked. On the other hand, immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, including Russia and Finland, increased 175.4 per cent from 1900 to 1910. During that period, the slums of Europe dumped their submerged inhabitants into America at a rate almost double that of the preceding decade, and the flow was still increasing at the time the census was taken. So it is more than likely that when the next census is taken it will be found that following 1910 there was an even greater flow from Spain, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Russia, Finland, and other countries where the iron hand of economic and political tyrannies had crushed great populations into ignorance and want. These peoples have not been in the United States long enough to produce great families. The census of 1920 will in all probability tell a story of a greater and more serious problem than did the last.

Over one-fourth of all the immigrants over fourteen years of age, admitted during the two decades preceding 1910, were illiterate. Of the 8,398,000 who arrived in the 1900-1910 period, 2,238,000 could not read or write. There were 1,600,000 illiterate foreigners in the United States when the 1910 census was taken. Do these elements give promise of a better race? Are we doing anything genuinely constructive to overcome this situation?

Two-thirds of the white foreign stock in the United States live in cities. Four-fifths of the populations of Chicago and New York are of this stock. More than two-thirds of the populations of Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, Newark, Jersey City, Providence, Worcester, Scranton, Paterson, Fall River, Lowell, Cambridge, Bridgeport, St. Paul, Minneapolis and San Francisco are of other than native white ancestry. Of the fifty principal cities of the United States there are only fourteen in which fifty per cent of the population is of unmixed native white parentage.

Only one state in the Union—North Carolina—has less than one per cent of the white foreign stock. New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, the Dakotas, Montana and Utah have more than fifty per cent foreign stock. Eleven states, including those on the Pacific Coast, have from 35 to 50 per cent. Maine, Ohio and Kansas have from 25 to 35 per cent. Maryland, Indiana, Missouri and Texas have from 15 to 25 per cent. These proportions are increasing rather than decreasing, owing to the extraordinarily high birth rate of the foreign strains.

A special analysis of 1915 vital statistics for certain states, in the World Almanac for 1918, shows that foreign-born mothers gave birth to nearly 62 per cent of the children born in Connecticut, nearly 58 per cent in Massachusetts, nearly 33 per cent in Michigan, nearly 58 per cent in Rhode Island, more than 43 per cent in New Hampshire, more than 54 per cent in New York and more than 38 per cent in Pennsylvania.

All these figures, be it remembered, fail to include foreign stock of the second generation after landing. If the statistics for children who have native parents but foreign-born grandparents, or who have one foreign-born parent, were given, they would doubtless leave but a small percentage of births from stocks native to the soil for several generations.

Immigrants or their children constitute the majority of workers employed in many of our industries. "Seven out of ten of those who work in our iron and steel industries are drawn from this class," says the National Geographic Magazine (February, 1917), "seven out of ten of our bituminous coal miners belong to it. Three out of four who work in packing towns were born abroad or are children of those who were born abroad; four out of five of those who make our silk goods, seven out of eight of those employed in woolen mills, nine out of ten of those who refine our petroleum, and nineteen out of twenty of those who manufacture our sugar are immigrants or the children of immigrants." And it might have shown a similarly high percentage of those in the ready-made clothing industries, railway and public works construction of the less skilled sort, and a number of others.

That these foreigners who have come in hordes have brought with them their ignorance of hygiene and modern ways of living and that they are handicapped by religious superstitions is only too true. But they also bring in their hearts a desire for freedom from all the tyrannies that afflict the earth. They would not be here if they did not bear within them the hardihood of pioneers, a courage of no mean order. They have the simple faith that in America they will find equality, liberty and an opportunity for a decent livelihood. And they have something else. The cell plasms of these peoples are freighted with the potentialities of the best in Old World civilization. They come from lands rich in the traditions of courage, of art, music, letters, science and philosophy. Americans no longer consider themselves cultured unless they have journeyed to these lands to find access to the treasures created by men and women of this same blood. The immigrant brings the possibilities of all these things to our shores, but where is the opportunity to reproduce in the New World the cultures of the old?

What opportunities have we given to these peoples to enrich our civilization? We have greeted them as "a lot of ignorant foreigners," we have shouted at, bustled and kicked them.

Our industries have taken advantage of their ignorance of the country's ways to take their toil in mills and mines and factories at starvation wages. We have herded them into slums to become diseased, to become social burdens or to die. We have huddled them together like rabbits to multiply their numbers and their misery. Instead of saying that we Americanize them, we should confess that we animalize them. The only freedom we seem to have given them is the freedom to make heavier and more secure their chains. What hope is there for racial progress in this human material, treated more carelessly and brutally than the cheapest factory product?

Nor are all our social handicaps bound up in the immigrant.

There were in the United States, when the Federal Industrial Relations Committee finished its work in 1915, several million migratory workers, most of them white, many of them married but separated from their families, who were compelled, like themselves, to struggle with dire want.

There were in 1910 more than 2,353,000 tenant farmers, two-thirds of whom lived and worked under the terrible conditions which the Industrial Relations Commission's report showed to prevail in the South and Southwest. These tenant farmers, as the report showed, were always in want, and were compelled by the very terms of the prevailing tenant contracts to produce children who must go to the fields and do the work of adults. The census proved that this tenancy was on the increase, the number of tenants in all but the New England and Middle Atlantic States having increased approximately 30 per cent from 1900 to 1910.

Moreover, there were in the United States in 1910, 5,516,163 illiterates. Of these 1,378,884 were of pure native white stock. In some states in the South as much as 29 per cent of the population is illiterate, many of these, of course, being Negroes.

There is still another factor to be considered—a factor which because of its great scope is more ominous than any yet mentioned. This is the underpaid mass of workers in the United States—workers whose low wages are forcing them deeper into want each day. Let Senator Borah, not a radical nor even a reformer, but a leader of the Republican party, tell the story. "Fifty-seven per cent of the families in the United States have incomes of $800 or less," said he in a speech before the Senate, August 24, 1917, "Seventy per cent of the families of our country have incomes of $1,000 or less. Tell me how a man so situated can have shelter for his family; how he can provide food and clothing. He is an industrial peon. His home is scant and pinched beyond the power of language to tell. He sees his wife and children on the ragged edge of hunger from week to week and month to month. If sickness comes, he faces suicide or crime. He cannot educate his children; he cannot fit them for citizenship; he cannot even fit them as soldiers to die for their country.

"It is the tragedy of our whole national life—how these people live in such times as these. We have not yet gathered the fruits of such an industrial condition in this country. We have been saved thus far by reason of the newness of our national life, our vast public lands now almost exhausted, our great natural resources now fast being seized and held, but the hour of reckoning will come."

Senator Borah was thinking, doubtless, of open revolution, of bloodshed and the destruction of property. In a far more terrible sense, the reckoning which he has referred to is already upon us. The ills we suffer as the result of the conditions now prevailing in the United States are appalling in their sum.

It is these conditions that produce the 3,000,000 child laborers of the United States; child slaves who undergo hardships that blight them physically and mentally, leaving them fit only to produce human beings whose deficiencies and misfortunes will exceed their own.

From these same elements, living under these same conditions come the feebleminded and other defectives. Just how many feebleminded there are in the United States, no one knows, because no attempt has ever been made to give public care to all of them, and families are more inclined to conceal than to reveal the mental defects of their members. Estimates vary from 350,000 at the present time to nearly 400,000 as early as 1890, Henry H. Goddard, Ph. D., of the Vineland, N. J., Training School, being authority for the latter statement. Only 34,137 of these unfortunates were under institutional care in the United States in 1916, the rest being free to propagate their kind—piling up public burdens for future generations. The feebleminded are notoriously prolific in reproduction. The close relationship between poverty and ignorance and the production of feebleminded is shown by Anne Moore, Ph.D., in a report to the Public Education Association of New York in 1911. She found that an overwhelming proportion of the classified feebleminded children in New York schools came from large families living in overcrowded slum conditions, and that only a small percentage were born of native parents.

Sixty thousand prostitutes go and come anew each year in the United States. This army of unfortunates, as social workers and scientists testify, come from families living under like conditions of want.

In the New York City schools alone in December, 1916, 61 per cent of the children were suffering from undernourishment and 21 per cent in immediate danger of it. These facts, also the result of the conditions outlined, were discovered by the city Bureau of Child Hygiene.

Another item in the sordid list is that of venereal disease. In his pamphlet entitled "The Venereal Diseases," issued in 1918, Dr. Hermann M. Biggs head of the New York State Department of Health quoted authorities who gave estimates of the amount of syphilis and gonorrhea in the United States. One says that 60 per cent of the men contract one disease or the other at some time. Another said that 40 per cent of the population of New York City had syphilis, one of the most terrible of all maladies. Poverty, delayed marriage, prostitution—a brief and terrible chain accounts for this scourge.

Finally, there is tuberculosis, bred by bad housing conditions and contributed to in frightful measure by poor food and unhealthy surroundings during the hours of employment. Dr. Frederick L. Hoffman, director of the National Association for the Study and Prevention of Tuberculosis and foremost statistical authority upon tuberculosis in the United States, says: "We know of 2,000,000 tubercular persons in the United States."

Does this picture horrify the reader? This is not the whole truth. A few scattered statistics lack the power to reflect the broken lives of overworked fathers, the ceaseless, increasing pain of overburdened mothers and the agony of childhood fighting its way against the handicaps of ill health, insufficient food, inadequate training and stifling toil.

Can we expect to remedy this situation by dismissing the problem of the submerged native elements with legislative palliatives or treating it with careless scorn? Do we better it by driving out of the immigrant's heart the dream of liberty that brought him to our shores? Do we solve the problem by giving him, instead of an opportunity to develop his own culture, low wages, a home in the slums and those pseudo-patriotic preachments which constitute our machine-made "Americanization"?

Every detail of this sordid situation means a problem that must be solved before we can even clear the way for a greater race in America. Nor is there any hope of solving any of these problems if we continue to attack them in the usual way.

Men have sentimentalized about them and legislated upon them. They have denounced them and they have applied reforms. But it has all been ridiculously, cruelly futile.

This is the condition of things for which those stand who demand more and more children. Each child born under such conditions but makes them worse—each child in its own person suffers the consequence of the intensified evils.

If we are to develop in America a new race with a racial soul, we must keep the birth rate within the scope of our ability to understand as well as to educate. We must not encourage reproduction beyond our capacity to assimilate our numbers so as to make the coming generation into such physically fit, mentally capable, socially alert individuals as are the ideal of a democracy.

The intelligence of a people is of slow evolutional development—it lags far behind the reproductive ability. It is far too slow to cope with conditions created by an increasing population, unless that increase is carefully regulated.

We must, therefore, not permit an increase in population that we are not prepared to care for to the best advantage—that we are not prepared to do justice to, educationally and economically. We must popularize birth control thinking. We must not leave it haphazardly to be the privilege of the already privileged. We must put this means of freedom and growth into the hands of the masses.

We must set motherhood free. We must give the foreign and submerged mother knowledge that will enable her to prevent bringing to birth children she does not want. We know that in each of these submerged and semisubmerged elements of the population there are rich factors of racial culture. Motherhood is the channel through which these cultures flow. Motherhood, when free to choose the father, free to choose the time and the number of children who shall result from the union, automatically works in wondrous ways. It refuses to bring forth weaklings; refuses to bring forth slaves; refuses to bear children who must live under the conditions described. It withholds the unfit, brings forth the fit; brings few children into homes where there is not sufficient to provide for them. Instinctively it avoids all those things which multiply racial handicaps. Under such circumstances we can hope that the "melting pot" will refine. We shall see that it will save the precious metals of racial culture, fused into an amalgam of physical perfection, mental strength and spiritual progress. Such an American race, containing the best of all racial elements, could give to the world a vision and a leadership beyond our present imagination.

I see that you are still up to your old heathenness tricks of trying to divert this conversation away from Margaret Sanger own words to THE MATERIALS OF THE NEW RACE. Now let us look at this flood of information that you are trying to use to hi-jack this blog with.

Like MARGAET SANGER and FRANCIS GALTON before her, THIS MATERIAL OF THE NEW RACE clearly was a failure to open up the gates to the Europeans did not work neither because they brought to this country the lowest of classes in Europe. For example, let us take from what you posted for a moment: CHAPTER III THE MATERIALS OF THE NEW RACE:

Of the foreign stock in the United States, the last general census, compiled in 1910, shows that 25.7 per cent was German, 14 per cent was Irish, 8.5 per cent was Russian or Finnish, 7.2 was English, 6.5 per cent Italian and 6.2 per cent Austrian. The Abstract of the same census points out several significant facts. The Western European strains in this country are represented by a majority of native-born children of foreign-born or mixed parentage. This is because the immigration from those sources has been checked. On the other hand, immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, including Russia and Finland, increased 175.4 per cent from 1900 to 1910. During that period, the slums of Europe dumped their submerged inhabitants into America at a rate almost double that of the preceding decade, and the flow was still increasing at the time the census was taken. So it is more than likely that when the next census is taken it will be found that following 1910 there was an even greater flow from Spain, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Russia, Finland, and other countries where the iron hand of economic and political tyrannies had crushed great populations into ignorance and want. These peoples have not been in the United States long enough to produce great families. The census of 1920 will in all probability tell a story of a greater and more serious problem than did the last.

Over one-fourth of all the immigrants over fourteen years of age, admitted during the two decades preceding 1910, were illiterate. Of the 8,398,000 who arrived in the 1900-1910 period, 2,238,000 could not read or write. There were 1,600,000 illiterate foreigners in the United States when the 1910 census was taken. Do these elements give promise of a better race? Are we doing anything genuinely constructive to overcome this situation?

Was this the dream of the superior white race that MARGAET SANGER, CHARLES DARWIN and FRANCIS GALTON before her had envisioned, I don't think so.

Steven, remember the concerns of the elite and the corporations, remember they was worried about since they could not exploit slave labor, there taxes was going to go through the roof, which brought about EUGENICS in the first place? You do remember that! Now listen to a republican party member talking about this flood of immigrants of white people. By the way Steven, all of this can be found in this material you just posted.

I quote: "There is still another factor to be considered—a factor which because of its great scope is more ominous than any yet mentioned. This is the underpaid mass of workers in the United States—workers whose low wages are forcing them deeper into want each day. Let Senator Borah, not a radical nor even a reformer, but a leader of the Republican party, tell the story. "Fifty-seven per cent of the families in the United States have incomes of $800 or less," said he in a speech before the Senate, August 24, 1917, "Seventy per cent of the families of our country have incomes of $1,000 or less. Tell me how a man so situated can have shelter for his family; how he can provide food and clothing. He is an industrial peon. His home is scant and pinched beyond the power of language to tell. He sees his wife and children on the ragged edge of hunger from week to week and month to month. If sickness comes, he faces suicide or crime. He cannot educate his children; he cannot fit them for citizenship; he cannot even fit them as soldiers to die for their country."


"It is the tragedy of our whole national life—how these people live in such times as these. We have not yet gathered the fruits of such an industrial condition in this country. We have been saved thus far by reason of the newness of our national life, our vast public lands now almost exhausted, our great natural resources now fast being seized and held, but the hour of reckoning will come."

All of this was brought about because of the white mans DILEMMA of the superior race of EUGENICS now known as Plan Parenthood.

This is what the elite did to this country to solve THE NEGRO DILEMMA but yet the oligarch's created another problem of educating these lower class European immigrants.

Now Steven, lets get back to the issues of MAAFA 21

On a practical level the relationship between SANGER and these elitist was basically a marriage of convenience in order to advance our common agendas They needed a front man and she need money. The whole thing would be held together by this kind of bizarre obsession with race and class. The result was that The American Birth Control became the driving force behind the American EUGENICS movement. EUGENICS would no longer just be a philosophy, SANGER and other like her we’re going to put it into practice.

“On the negative side it shows us that we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an ever increasingly unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.” MARGART SANGER

Steven, I hope that you are not that MARGART SANGER did not say these things or that she was a role model to follow and emulate, are you?

It's history Ron. You are the one who refuses to deal with the present.

If you are not aware of your history, you are like a mighty oak without roots, you are doomed to fall.

Steven, I hope that you are not that MARGART SANGER did not say these things or that she was a role model to follow and emulate, are you?

Margaret Sanger will have to wait. I gave you the link Ron.

No... Margaret Sanger is the main topic here Steven. Now if you want to run from this question it one thing but that link was way before you added this other material to this blog called CHAPTER III THE MATERIALS OF THE NEW RACE which sparked this question of: "Steven, I hope that you are not that MARGART SANGER did not say these things or that she was a role model to follow and emulate, are you?"

So, what are you doing to do? Run from this question of stand up for what you believe in?

You can have your sound bites Ron, it's not for me.

Ron, can you tell me which chapter this quote is from?

"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)

Because it's not in chapter 2, where the subject is infanticide and abortion, and where she says for example, "It is apparent that nothing short of contraceptives can put an end to the horrors of abortion and infanticide."

So Steven, you are not going to answer my questions of "Steven, I hope that you are not that MARGART SANGER did not say these things or that she was a role model to follow and emulate, are you?"

So, what are you doing to do? Run from this question of stand up for what you believe in?

It really looks like you decided to run away and hide from those questions and hide, what a shame!!!

I wish that I was talking to somebody who believes in what he is saying. WOW!

Here's the context of that quote. Context makes all the difference. Quit running from research Ron.

If its effects upon the mother and the wage-earning father were not enough to condemn the large family as an institution, its effects upon the child would make the case against it conclusive. In the United States, some 300,000 children under one year of age die each twelve months. Approximately ninety per cent of these deaths are directly or indirectly due to malnutrition, to other diseased conditions resulting from poverty, or to excessive childbearing by the mother.

The direct relationship between the size of the wage-earner's family and the death of children less than one year old has been revealed by a number of studies of the infant death rate. One of the clearest of these was that made by Arthur Geissler among miners and cited by Dr. Alfred Ploetz before the First International Eugenic Congress. [Footnote: Problems in Eugenics, London, 1913.] Taking 26,000 births from unselected marriages, and omitting families having one and two children, Geissler got this result:

Deaths During
First Year.
1st born children 23%
2nd " " 20%
3rd " " 21%
4th " " 23%
5th " " 26%
6th " " 29%
7th " " 31%
8th " " 33%
9th " " 36%
10th " " 41%
11th " " 51%
12th " " 60%
Thus we see that the second and third children have a very good chance to live through the first year. Children arriving later have less and less chance, until the twelfth has hardly any chance at all to live twelve months.

This does not complete the case, however, for those who care to go farther into the subject will find that many of those who live for a year die before they reach the age of five.

Many, perhaps, will think it idle to go farther in demonstrating the immorality of large families, but since there is still an abundance of proof at hand, it may be offered for the sake of those who find difficulty in adjusting old-fashioned ideas to the facts. The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. The same factors which create the terrible infant mortality rate, and which swell the death rate of children between the ages of one and five, operate even more extensively to lower the health rate of the surviving members. Moreover, the overcrowded homes of large families reared in poverty further contribute to this condition. Lack of medical attention is still another factor, so that the child who must struggle for health in competition with other members of a closely packed family has still great difficulties to meet after its poor constitution and malnutrition have been accounted for.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

selfClaiming 'whiteMan' steveAdam SCOLDS his SUB "Race".... 'blackHebrewIsraelite'

...... THE MATERIALS OF THE NEW RACISTS.....oldeRacism, Division and Misconception......hisStory

"......It's history Ron. You are the one who refuses to deal with the present...."
Monday, April 25th 2016 at 1:07PM
Steve Williams

"....If you are not aware of your history, you are like a mighty oak without roots, you are doomed to fall.

Steven, I hope that you are not that MARGART SANGER ......"

Monday, April 25th 2016 at 1:31PM
Deacon Ron Gray

***********************************************

'blackHebrewIsraelite' TRYING to be MORE racistlyIgnorant than BIA, selfMade 'whiteMan' steveAdam

STOP this stereotypical racistlyIgnorant Misconception.........

Even in this context you can find very few if any families with 12 family members in it.
Also Steven, what a cold thing to suggest to anybody that they should kill there child.

I am not running from a thing Steven and I am not ashame to tell you and the world that MARGART SANGER is wrong in new statement and philosophy then and those who agree with this Type of thinking is wrong too and this is no sound bite Steven, here me loud and clear. Unlike yourself, I will not run and hide like ypurself on this issue.

So, I ask you for the third time: So Steven, you are not going to answer my questions of "Steven, I hope that you are not that MARGART SANGER did not say these things or that she was a role model to follow and emulate, are you?"

She didn't say anyone should kill their child. She said a large family killed the child.

A second mother to me was a woman with 12 children. Little Johnny ran across the road playing dodge the car and got killed. She died at age forty or so.

What are you saying now Ron, that you are against birth control?

Steven, you have some questions on the floor from me that you are dodging, dodging, you are still running from...

I'm in full accord with Margaret Sanger.

Then you believe in abortions don't you because she does.

She was anti-abortion. Didn't you read chapter 2 Ron? Of course you didn't.

So Steven, you are saying that Margaret is a person You want to emulate? Was Margaret Sanger not the the Founder of Planned Parenthood? Was Margaret a Eugenicist?

Planned Parenthood no longer follows their founder. Margaret Sanger was anti-abortion and yes, she should be emulated. As far as Eugenics Ron, I don't think you know what Eugenics is.

No Steve, Margaret Sanger was about birth control and not anti -abortionist there is a difference. Sanger supported negative eugenics. Negative eugenics is the improvement of the genetic makeup of a population by preventing the reproduction of the obviously unfit.

People deemed unfit to reproduce often included people with mental or physical disabilities, people who scored in the low ranges of different IQ tests, criminals and deviants, and members of disfavored minority groups. Now who do you think was meant by " members of disfavored minority groups?"

Negative eugenics by provision of information and services, i.e. reduction of unplanned pregnancies and births.
1."Just say no" campaigns.
2.s*x education in schools.
3.School-based clinics.
4.Promoting the use of contraception.
5.Emergency contraception.
6.Research for better contraceptives.
7.Sterilization.
8.Abortion.

Their is a difference so, Steven you can take that Margaret Sanger was anti-abortionist BS to the weak, I know better.

Steven, I am very sorry that you want to follow a heathen like her, WOW!

Ron, I've looked at the truth of your quotes of four individuals now, Darwin, Galton, Sanger, and Myrdal. Don't be a sucker.

So, after the proof has been set before you, that you was wrong about Margaret Sanger being add antiabortionist, even after the FACTS have been shown to you that she put into place negative eugenics to eliminate unwanted Minority groups and you are still saying don't be suckered, then tell me that none of this Never happened in America's history, can you that?

Have you still not read chapter 2 Ron?

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

Why Do Black People Hate Black People So Much? Question: Why Do Some Black People Hate Each Other So Much?

selfClaiming 'whiteMan' steveAdam and Fellow RACIST......'blackHebrewIsraelite' ......PROVE that

Maafa 1-13-1,000,000.....IS as MUCH nonsense as their RACISM in 2016....with

"Ron, I've looked at the truth of your quotes ..... Darwin, Galton, Sanger, and Myrdal. Don't be a sucker. "

Wednesday, April 27th 2016 at 12:34AM
Steve Williams

So, after the proof has been set before you, that you was wrong about Margaret Sanger being add antiabortionist, even after the FACTS have been shown to you that she put into place negative eugenics to eliminate unwanted Minority groups and you are still saying don't be suckered,...... America's history...."

Wednesday, April 27th 2016 at 7:39AM
Deacon Ron Gray

*****************************************

Guys, this is 2016....because of your stereotypical Racist Misconceptions, and oldeTime NONSENSE

-----BIA has LOST over the years the INCREDIBLE Minds of African American Families from Mexico, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Panama, Columbia, Brazil, Venezuela, etal.....and the Intelligent Magnificence of Marta, Carmen M Colon, Katarina, etal......

do take your Racist NONSENSE away from, BIA....An African American Family WWWEB site.....

Look at the hits Robert. 2296 and counting.

What happen Steven, it that the best you can do? I asked you a question, are you going to run from that one too?

The question is: "So, after the proof has been set before you, that you was wrong about Margaret Sanger being add antiabortionist, even after the FACTS have been shown to you that she put into place negative eugenics to eliminate unwanted Minority groups and you are still saying don't be suckered, then tell me that none of this Never happened in America's history, can you do that?"

None of what never happened in America's history? Negative eugenics? I don't think so Ron.

That was the Nazis. Not in America.

CHAPTER X

CONTRACEPTIVES OR ABORTION?

Society has not yet learned the significance of the age-long effort of the feminine spirit to free itself of the burden of excessive childbearing. It has been singularly blind to the real forces underlying the cause of infanticide, child abandonment and abortion. It has permitted the highest and most powerful thing in woman's nature to be hindered, diverted, repressed and confused. Society has permitted this inner urge of woman to be rendered violent by repression until it has expressed itself in cruel forms of family limitation, which this same society has promptly labeled "crimes" and sought to punish. It has gone on blindly forcing women into these "crimes," deaf alike to their entreaties and to the lessons of history.

As we have seen in the second chapter of this book, child abandonment and infanticide are by no means obsolete practices. As for abortion, it has not decreased but increased with the advance of civilization. The reader will recall that one authority says that there are 1,000,000 abortions in the United States every year, while another estimates double that number.

Most of the women of the middle and upper classes in America seem secure in their knowledge of contraceptives as a means of birth control. Under present conditions, when the laws in most states regard this knowledge, howsoever it be imparted, as illicit, and the federal statutes prohibit the sending of it through the mails, even the women in more fortunate circumstances sometimes have difficulty in getting scientific information. Nevertheless, so strong is their purpose that they do obtain it and use it, correctly or incorrectly.

The great majority of women, however, belong to the working class. Nearly all of these women will fall into one of two general groups—the ones who are having children against their wills, and those who, to escape this evil, find refuge in abortion. Being given their choice by society—to continue to be overburdened mothers or to submit to a humiliating, repulsive, painful and too often gravely dangerous operation, those women in whom the feminine urge to freedom is strongest choose the abortionist. One group goes on bringing children to birth, hoping that they will be born dead or die. The women of the other group strive consciously by drastic means to protect themselves and the children already born.

"Our examinations," says Dr. Max Hirsch, an authority on the subject, "have informed us that the largest number of abortions (in the United States) are performed on married women. This fact brings us to the conclusion that contraceptive measures among the upper classes and the practice of abortion among the lower class, are the real means employed to regulate the number of offspring."

Thus a high percentage of women in comfortable circumstances escape overbreeding by the use of contraceptives. A similarly high percentage of women not in comfortable circumstances are forced to submit to forced maternity, because their only alternative at present is abortion. When accidental conception takes place, some women of both classes resort to abortion if they can obtain the services of an abortionist.

When society holds up its hands in horror at the "crime" of abortion, it forgets at whose door the first and principal responsibility for this practice rests. Does anyone imagine that a woman would submit to abortion if not denied the knowledge of scientific, effective contraceptives? Does anyone believe that physicians and midwives who perform abortions go from door to door soliciting patronage? The abortionist could not continue his practice for twenty-four hours if it were not for the fact that women come desperately begging for such operations. He could not stay out of jail a day if women did not so generally approve of his services as to hold his identity an open but seldom-betrayed secret.

The question, then, is not whether family limitation should be practiced. It is being practiced; it has been practiced for ages and it will always be practiced. The question that society must answer is this: Shall family limitation be achieved through birth control or abortion? Shall normal, safe, effective contraceptives be employed, or shall we continue to force women to the abnormal, often dangerous surgical operation?

This question, too, the church, the state and the moralist must answer. The knowledge of contraceptive methods may yet for a time be denied to the woman of the working class, but those who are responsible for denying it to her, and she herself, should understand clearly the dangers to which she is exposed because of the laws which force her into the hands of the abortionist.

The Nazis used gas but the heathens in this country used trees, ropes, dogs, jails, birth control, abortions, sterilizations, drugs, the police, guns and I can go on and on with the Philosophy of negative eugenics. Philosophy of negative eugenics.

Ron, I haven't seen any philosophy of negative eugenics in anything I've read by Darwin, Galton, Sanger, or Myrdal.

You have not seen any philosophy of negative eugenics in anything I've read by Darwin, Galton, Sanger, or Myrdal.

Nice play on words Steven, all of this: trees, ropes, dogs, jails, birth control, abortions, sterilizations, drugs, the police, guns and much, much, more is the product of the philosophy of negative eugenics throughout the history, to this very day, in The United States of America and you don't see that?

Trees, ropes, dogs, jails, drugs, the police, and guns are not in dispute Ron. Birth control, infanticide, abortion, and sterilization are.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

For decades people of African decent have accused the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour.

Such accusations have always been met with laughter, ridicule and the accuser labelled as conspiracy nuts with a chip on their shoulder.

-------- white always makes the first move and this move was made centuries ago.

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray
Tuesday, April 12th 2016 at 9:23AM

***************************************************************************

Master DNA 'whiteMan' steveAdam leads his slaveRACIST.....'blackHebrewIsraelite' ...offSUBJECT to PROVE.....

------------ Maafa 1-13-1,000,000.....IS as MUCH nonsense as their RACISM in 2016

".... Look at the hits Robert. 2296 and counting......negative eugenics ....Darwin, Galton, Sanger, or Myrdal. ..."

Wednesday, April 27th 2016 at 8:40AM
Steve Williams

".....The Nazis used gas but the heathens in this country used trees, ropes, dogs, jails, birth control, abortions, sterilizations, drugs, the police, guns ........ Philosophy of negative eugenics. ...."

Wednesday, April 27th 2016 at 3:05PM
Deacon Ron Gray

**********************************************

The United States of America could in 2016 use LESS, NONE of what RACISTS steveAdam and deacon sell..

STOP it ...... at BIA, an African American Family from María de la Soledad Teresa O'Brien

I see you haven't seen the video Robert.

Was this negative eugenics put in a practice at any form Steven negative eugenics put in a practice practice?

By the Nazis yes.

Why the Nazi Steven?

Because of WW1.

what are you talking about Because of WW1?

You asked why the nazis used eugenics. Because of ww1.

Please explain...

It's a very long answer Ron. It's because Germany was defeated in WW1 and the conditions in Germany following that defeat.

Adolf Hitler's rise to power began in Germany in September 1919[a] when Hitler joined the political party known as the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei – DAP (German Workers' Party). The name was changed in 1920 to the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei – NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers' Party, commonly known as the Nazi Party). This political party was formed and developed during the post-World War I era. It was anti-Marxist and opposed to the democratic post-war government of the Weimar Republic and the Treaty of Versailles; and it advocated extreme nationalism and Pan-Germanism as well as virulent anti-Semitism. Hitler's "rise" can be considered to have ended in March 1933, after the Reichstag adopted the Enabling Act of 1933 in that month. President Paul von Hindenburg had already appointed Hitler as Chancellor on 30 January 1933 after a series of parliamentary elections and associated backroom intrigues. The Enabling Act—when used ruthlessly and with authority—virtually assured that Hitler could thereafter constitutionally exercise dictatorial power without legal objection.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitl...

Of the many provisions in the treaty, one of the most important and controversial required "Germany [to] accept the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage" during the war (the other members of the Central Powers signed treaties containing similar articles). This article, Article 231, later became known as the War Guilt clause. The treaty forced Germany to disarm, make substantial territorial concessions, and pay reparations to certain countries that had formed the Entente powers. In 1921 the total cost of these reparations was assessed at 132 billion Marks (then $31.4 billion or £6.6 billion, roughly equivalent to US $442 billion or UK £284 billion in 2016). At the time economists, notably John Maynard Keynes, predicted that the treaty was too harsh – a "Carthaginian peace" – and said the reparations figure was excessive and counter-productive, views that, since then, have been the subject of ongoing debate by historians and economists from several countries.

Steven,

None of this, that you call your very long answer has nothing to do with Adolf Hitler's putting in a practice negative eugenics.

In your so-called very long answer you never mentioned anything on this subject of EUGENICS AT ALL.

You have been BUSTED in this BULL💩 in your attempt to sanitize the vile and evil EUGENICS that people like Margret Sanger's philosophy of EUGENICS did to the world under the light of racism and that it is still doing today.

Did you read Explorations in Escape?

Life Dynamics Inc. (LDI) is an anti-abortion organization founded by Mark Crutcher in 1992. It is headquartered in Denton, Texas. The organization's motto is, "Pro-Life: without compromise, without exception, without apology".[1]

You are so far off topic that you are no long participating in the same free flowing conversation. You have been busted for lying and now you are just all over the place now.

With that said, I will bring you back to the topic and bring you up to speed. I would like to share my notes from MAAFA 21 2 of 13

“The black man has never been a competitor, but has always been subservient to the white race. And just so longer as he remains subservient his position is secure, and just so soon as he becomes a competitor his fate is sealed.” Dr. Benjamin Hays, Eugenicist 1905

The American Birth Control League was wise enough to get their program of population control across, by using what had worked in the past, the same code words that had established the introductions of slavery, which was also used by the early EUGENICS MOVEMENT. Once again these words like Feebleminded, unfit, imbecile, immoral and criminal, was used by The American Control League. The Margret Sangers of these days, did not come right out to say that they was trying to eliminate Black people but what they did say was, that they are trying to rid society of the Feebleminded, that they was trying to rid society of the criminal. She was successful, simply because of her EUGENIC friends for the past 50 years which put those labels on black people and minorities and therefore society was more or less desensitized. In effect the code words hide the agenda of Margret Sangers and other Eugenicists for years.

I guess you believe what Mark Crutcher tells you to believe.

BTW Ron, everything I've posted has to do with various lies in your presentation. This video is bunk.

The worst lie by far being what they said about Gunnar Myrdal. As you would know if you bothered to read him.

I was presenting the case of negative eugenics when you brought to the floor that the Nazi put negative eugenics into practice because of WW1. At this point, I asked you what was you talking about, to explain your point. That is when you said this: It's a very long answer Ron. It's because Germany was defeated in WW1 and the conditions in Germany following that defeat. Steven from there you went off course and never did explain how The Nazi used negative eugenics and put it into practice in WW1 and to this date, you still have not proved that point of yours yet.

Instead of explaining yourself with the Nazi point of view, out of the clear blue, you bring to the surface Gunnar Myrdal. Since you have been BUSTED in a series of LIES on this subject alone, now you want to call this video presentation BUNK!!! (LOL) and I just got to MAAFA 21 2 of 13 WOW!!!

Man, collect your thoughts and get yourself together on THE FACTS of the history of EUGENICS.

That's what I've been presenting. The facts.

You have not offered no FACTS when it came to the Nazi putting negative eugenics into practice. You failed miserably to present that FACT. You have not presented NO FACTS HERE. THAT, Steven is the LIE you are telling NOW!

So, instead of presenting the FACTS about the NAZI EUGENICS PROGRAM, you chose to run from that topic and hide behind something totally unrelated.

WOW!!!!

Ron, your video tries to draw a line from Sanger to the Nazis. I say the line is from the first world war to the second. Sanger had nothing to do with it.

"Maybe I am not objective when it comes to Planned Parenthood, but, you know, I know who Margaret Sanger is, and I know that she believed in eugenics, and that she was not particularly enamored with black people.
"And one of the reasons you find most of their clinics in black neighborhoods is so that you can find a way to control that population. I think people should go back and read about Margaret Sanger who founded this place — a woman Hillary Clinton by the way says that she admires. Look and see what many people in Nazi Germany thought about her."

http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics...

Margaret Sanger and the Nazis: How Many Degrees of Separation?
GeraldV.O'Brien

http://rewire.news/wp-content/uploads/2015...

Signs of DEFEAT in DEBATE are Deleters....Those FRIGHTENED by words with NO words BUT Misconception and Fraud themselves.......ps Also signs of chess defeat..........

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

"....without doubt one of the most important you will ever watch....... the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour.

This 137 minute film ...... in keeping with the rules of chess, white always makes the first move and this move was made centuries ago.

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray
Tuesday, April 12th 2016 at 9:23AM

*************************************************

'blackHebrewIsraelite' ELEVATES the RACIST NONSENSE of 'whiteMan' steveAdam

".......Robert, Have you seen this MAAFA21 video presentation? ....."

Sunday, April 24th 2016 at 9:15AM
Deacon Ron Gray

**********************************

".....I see you haven't seen the video Robert. ...."
Thursday, April 28th 2016 at 8:38AM
Steve Williams

***********************************

Master DNA 'whiteMan' steveAdam leads his slaveRACIST.....'blackHebrewIsraelite' ...offSUBJECT to PROVE.....

------------ Maafa 1-13-1,000,000.....IS as MUCH nonsense as their RACISM in 2016

".... Look at the hits Robert. 2296 and counting......negative eugenics ....Darwin, Galton, Sanger, or Myrdal. ..."

Wednesday, April 27th 2016 at 8:40AM
Steve Williams

".....The Nazis used gas but the heathens in this country used trees, ropes, dogs, jails, birth control, abortions, sterilizations, drugs, the police, guns ........ Philosophy of negative eugenics. ...."

Wednesday, April 27th 2016 at 3:05PM
Deacon Ron Gray

**********************************************

The United States of America could in 2016 use LESS, NONE of what RACISTS steveAdam and deacon sell..

STOP it ...... at BIA, an African American Family from María de la Soledad Teresa O'Brien

STOP it ...... at BIA, African American Families have CHANGED to President Barack Hussein Obama

What is this? Steven, you are still talking in very vague talking points for example. YOUR WORDS: Ron, your video tries to draw a line from Sanger to the Nazis. I say the line is from the first world war to the second. Sanger had nothing to do with it.

What line? Sanger, had nothing to do with what STEVEN?

In your second reply, you have the nerve to parrot Ben Carson alleged in an interview with Fox News on Planned Parenthood about what Hillary Clinton allegedly said, WOW. STEVEN, you are aware on August 14, 2015 Ben Carson was still in the race for The Republican Party Nominee for president and a rising star which turned out to be a failed campaign.

In this very same link that you have provided for my review clearly say: “In reading her papers, it is clear Sanger had bought into the movement. She once wrote that "consequences of breeding from stock lacking human vitality always will give us social problems and perpetuate institutions of charity and crime." I might add, that Margaret Sanger submitted this paper to the Congress, but was rejected. Steven, do you know what that means to be rejected by a 1921 congress when race relations was not very good?

Birth Control and Racial Betterment By Margaret Sanger" Feb 1919.

STEVEN, I am just going to quote the first three paragraphs of Margaret Sanger papers on Birth Control and Racial Betterment," Feb 1919 for your review of this woman who the congress rejected and then I will provide a link so you can read the rest at your convenience:

Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.

Eugenists emphasize the mating of healthy couples for the conscious purpose of producing healthy children, the sterilization of the unfit to prevent their populating the world with their kind and they may, perhaps, agree with us that contraception is a necessary measure among the masses of the workers, where wages do not keep pace with the growth of the family and its necessities in the way of food, clothing, housing, medical attention, education and the like.

We who advocate Birth Control, on the other hand, lay all our emphasis upon stopping not only the reproduction of the unfit but upon stopping all reproduction when there is not economic means of providing proper care for those who are born in health. The eugenist also believes that a woman should bear as many healthy children as possible as a duty to the state. We hold that the world is already over-populated. Eugenists imply or insist that a woman's first duty is to the state; we contend that her duty to herself is her duty to the state.

Steven, this is what you came up with? Here is that link I promised you, keep in mind, these are words from Margaret Sanger herself. https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/webedi...

The Nazi took the negative eugenics by Margaret Sanger to a all time level. Remember those CODE words, Feebleminded, unfit, imbecile, immoral and criminal, was used. WELL the Nazi dealt with their unfit and they called them JEWS, GYPSIES, BLACKS and MONGRELS.

Ron, I think I forgot to show you this one.

https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/webedi...

Ron, Ben Carson was making the same argument as you. About lines to the Nazis, why did the Nazis burn Sanger's books?

No STEVEN, I did not forget anything Steven, Remember, I made Margaret Sanger papers for all to review https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/webedi...

What Ben Carson did and all lyres do is to mix some truths with a LIE, that is what he did and that is what you are trying to do but the truth is their to stop your LIES dead in their tracks.

OH!!! By the way Steven, Did they burn Margaret Sanger's book after what the Nazis did? Because Sanger's books, looks like the LAW OF LAND during Hitler's life time.

Who said you forgot anything Ron? So what's your point? What does your true 'truth' have to do in 2016? What's its value? Vote Democrat?

Let me get back to my notes on MAAFA 21 2 of 13 “The black man has never been a competitor, but has always been subservient to the white race. And just so long as he remains subservient his position is secure, and just so soon as he becomes a competitor his fate is sealed.” Dr. Benjamin Hays, Eugenicist 1905

At that time the philosophy, unquestionably was used to target the poor simply because it was the quality of life at its core meaning was that poor people really didn’t have a reason to live. Only the white, those with status, had any chance to have a meaningful or a purposeful life. The solution for the poor now was not to eliminate the circumstances that would cause poverty but their solution now was to eliminate the poor, to eliminate the impoverished and just wipe them off the face of the EARTH.

Notice in this paragraph said, which I want to highlight of a quote of Sangers: "The solution for the poor now was not to eliminate the circumstances that would cause poverty but their solution now was to eliminate the poor, to eliminate the impoverished and just wipe them off the face of the EARTH." Now this as been known as scholarship and science talking.

“The practice of birth control among the majority of colored people would probably be more EUGENIC than among their white compatriots. The dissemination of the information of birth control should have begun with this class rather than with the upper social and economic classes of white citizens.” WALTER TERPENING Birth Control Review 1932.

STEVEN, history is the truth and it will be told.

Finally we are on the subject of the poor. Jesus said the poor are always with us.

That is correct Steven and heathens in this country like Margaret Sanger, Dr. Benjamin Hays, Eugenicist 1905, WALTER TERPENING Birth Control Review 1932 want to play God and eliminate groups of people like the Negro.

“In virtually every community where NEGROS dwell, one finds them in fat times and lean alike contributing a disproportionate number to the roles the dependence and delinquents they make excessive demands on the white man’s charity and overtax his patience.” NEWELL SIMS Birth Control Review 1932

Malthusian Eugenics Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology prevailed in the early 20th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused racial supremacy and purity, particularly of the Aryan race. Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by encouraging the fit to reproduce and the unfit to restrict their reproduction. They sought to contain the inferior races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion. Sanger embraced Malthusian eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus, a 19th-century cleric and professor of political economy, believed a population time bomb threatened the existence of the human race.

2 He viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as evidence of this population crisis. According to writer George Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence, because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was to restrict population growth of certain groups of people.

3 His theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis for national and international social policy. Grant quotes from Malthus’ magnum opus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in six editions from 1798 to 1826: - See more at: http://www.cwfa.org/the-negro-project-marg...

Jesus was right and the eugenicists were wrong. Now what?

Jesus was right and the eugenicists were wrong, along with the White supremacist. What took you so long to realize that?

Now back to my notes of MAAFA 21 2 of 13 I see that you never did explain why you thing the Nazis used negative eugenics and put it into practice in WW1 and to this date, you still have not proved that point of yours yet, was that just talk Steven?

I'd rather get back to our modern day American eugenicists, Barack Obama and his heiress Hillary Clinton.

I see that you want to talk about anything to focus attention off the FACT that you got bust of LYING at every turn that you tried to take. Until then Steven, I still would like to share my notes of MAAFA Part 2 of 13.

The practice of birth control among the majority of colored people would probably be more EUGENICS that among their white compatriots. The dissemination of the information of birth control should have begun with this class rather than with the upper social and economic classes of white citizens. WALTER TERPENING Birth Control Review 1932.

I just want to show you some more information about the woman that you where trying to protect, Margaret Sanger. The Negro Project: Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Plan for Black Americans - See more at: http://www.cwfa.org/the-negro-project-marg...

OH! STEVEN if you have seen this material before, I see that you made no comment of none of it. instead you ran from these FACTS too.

The facts are that Obama and Clinton are the abortionists, they are the ones encouraging those mothers not capable of raising children to destroy them, for the betterment of the American race.

Still no reply to The Negro Project: Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Plan for Black Americans - See more at: http://www.cwfa.org/the-negro-project-marg...

More from my notes of MAAFA 21 Part 2 0f 13.

“In virtually every community where Negroes dwell, one finds them in fat times and lean alike contributing a disproportionate number to the rolls of the dependence and delinquents they make excessive demands on the white man’s charity and over taxes patience.” NEWELL SIMS Birth Control Review 1932

Ron, your article talks about Malthus, and about Sanger. And you quote "Newell Sims". I've showed you what Margaret Sanger herself said. She was anti-abortion.

All of these people are about the Elimination of people of color and Preserving White supremacy, is that what you are about Steven?

Your article quotes from The Pivot of Civilization. That would be a primary source. Have you read it Ron?

No Ron I'm not about White Supremacy. I'm about Black History.

And Ron, the title of your video is Maafa 21. The '21' stands for the 21st century, the one we live in now, the one where Hillary Clinton is now looming.

The Pivot of Civilization
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1689/1689-h...

Regarding myself, I may say that my experience in the course of the past twelve or fifteen years has been of a type to force upon me certain convictions that demand expression. For years I had believed that the solution of all our troubles was to be found in well-defined programmes of political and legislative action. At first, I concentrated my whole attention upon these, only to discover that politicians and law-makers are just as confused and as much at a loss in solving fundamental problems as anyone else. And I am speaking here not so much of the corrupt and ignorant politician as of those idealists and reformers who think that by the ballot society may be led to an earthly paradise. They may honestly desire and intend to do great things. They may positively glow—before election—with enthusiasm at the prospect they imagine political victory may open to them. Time after time, I was struck by the change in their attitude after the briefest enjoyment of this illusory power. Men are elected during some wave of reform, let us say, elected to legislate into practical working existence some great ideal. They want to do big things; but a short time in office is enough to show the political idealist that he can accomplish nothing, that his reform must be debased and dragged into the dust, so that even if it becomes enacted, it may be not merely of no benefit, but a positive evil. It is scarcely necessary to emphasize this point. It is an accepted commonplace of American politics. So much of life, so large a part of all our social problems, moreover, remains untouched by political and legislative action. This is an old truth too often ignored by those who plan political campaigns upon the most superficial knowledge of human nature.

Steven, the purpose of this blog is to explore and discover the history of MAAFA 21 and it's beginnings. it is my intent to thoroughly explore this history and gradually being us through to the present day? I thank You for this information of the The Pivot of Civilization, this is great information for another topic, another blog but I have information here to share with the readers of Black In America for a while now.

Steven, if you have any questions about the material presented in this blog, please feel free to ask them and we will explore that question together and I will answer your on topic questions the best way I can.

Steven, do you have any comments on this: He viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as evidence of this population crisis. According to writer George Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence, because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was to restrict population growth of certain groups of people.

3 His theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis for national and international social policy. Grant quotes from Malthus’ magnum opus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in six editions from 1798 to 1826: - See more at: http://www.cwfa.org/the-negro-project-marg...

Thank You for your participation but like us answer the question put forth to one other and stay on topic of the blog.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

For decades people of African decent have accused the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour.

.....deaconRonGray area

************************************************

First, All of the Family of Adaam(as) have Colours and Shapes.......

-----But those Colours and Shapes WERE defined by 'the RACIST europeanIN THE NAME OF JESUS crowds that started to rape, torture and murder the African Asian, Indigenous People

....OR.... 'redNecks'.... paganChristian ....'whiteSupremists' europeanCOLOURED in 1492-1864(1964)

******************************************

BUT the two eugenics, Darwin, Nazi RACIST Maafas want to intellectual Divide 2016...Intelligence with....

BIA, selfClaiming 'whiteMan' steveAdam....

"....Jesus was right ........... Now what? ...."

Saturday, April 30th 2016 at 7:25PM
Steve Williams

and his 'whiteSupremist' brother......'blackHebrewIsraelite' agrees and continues......

"Jesus was right .......along with the White supremacist. ...."

Let me get back to my notes on MAAFA 21 2 of 13

“The black man has never been a competitor, but has always been subservient to the white race....":

Saturday, April 30th 2016 at 8:08PM
Deacon Ron Gray

*****************************************

but slaveDeacon CANNOT INTELLECTUALLY hang OFF SUBJECT with bigBrother steveAdam

-----AND CRIES.............

Steven, the purpose of this blog is to explore and discover the history of MAAFA 21 and it's beginnings. it is my intent to thoroughly explore this history and gradually being us through to the present day?

Thank You for your participation but like us answer the question put forth to one other and stay on topic of the blog.

Sunday, May 1st 2016 at 8:34AM
Deacon Ron Gray

***********************************

your blag is NONSENSE and you went 3000+ Hits with 'whiteSteve' ARGUING 'whiteSupremacy'

-------AND your weakUNEDUCATED enabling of RACIST, paganChristian 'whiteSupremacy'

STOP it and DELETE this MADNESS

....... 2016 is President Baraaka Hussein Obama CIVILIZED America....

BOBBY, please tell me THAT YOU HAVE SEEN THIS VIDEO SERIES?

BOBBY, please tell me THAT YOU HAVE SEEN THIS VIDEO SERIES?

Sunday, May 1st 2016 at 9:10AM
Deacon Ron Gray

*******************************************

FIRST......my name is Robert Powell, will go by powellRobert

...... BUT NEVER ever have I used the Disrespectful term..... BOBBY.....to selfDescribe

...... BUT since I am not 'blackWhite' or 'whiteBlack' LIKE your brother steveAdam

You in GRAND IGNORANT MAAFA 1-1000 Fashion respect 'whiteSUPREMACY' thinkerSTEVEN...?

STOP your slaveLIKE.....uncleTOMING.....IT IS 2016 and be Intelligent........

1. you could call me African American

2. you could call me American Muslim

3. you could call me African Asian Monotheistic Believer

3000 hits with you and your MASTER, steveAdam......arguing.....ABOUT THE VIDEO?

Until you stop acting like a BOBBY, I will call it like I see it.

I asked you one question: BOBBY, please tell me THAT YOU HAVE SEEN THIS VIDEO SERIES?

It is not what a person calls another but what matters is, what one answers to that counts.

Now Robert, please tell me THAT YOU HAVE SEEN THIS VIDEO SERIES?

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

TITLE of 'video' that 'blackHebrewIsraelite' writes

.........This documentary is without doubt one of the most important you will ever watch.

..........................Abortion: BLACK GENOCIDE in the 21st Century 1-13.....................

then the deacon of disrespect and Misconception states

"......Such accusations have always been met with laughter, ridicule and the accuser labelled as conspiracy nuts with a chip on their shoulder......"

THE TITLE of 'video' and your Blag.....1-13 is I AGREE with YOU ridiculous and cartoonically silly

I, Robert Powell....BELIEVE

1. Abortion is Hatred of the Creator of Adaam(as).
2. Abortion is American SelfHate
3. Abortion is American Murder
4. Abortion is FILTHY, EVIL and stereotypical American Irresponsibility of LIFE

BUT it is NOT genocide............

Genocide has become an official term used in international relations.
The word genocide was not in use before 1944.

Polish-Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin, described the policies of systematic murder founded by the Nazis as genocide.

The word genocide is the combination of the Greek prefix geno- (meaning tribe or race) and caedere (the Latin word for to kill).

The word is defined as a specific set of violent crimes that are committed against a certain group with the attempt to remove the entire group from existence or to destroy them.

----------'blackChristian' females in 2016 that abort the LIFE they manufactured with a Male are NOT committing Genocide

So, as I have Written MANY times to you, I DO NOT WASTE MY TIME on Cartoonic Videos

BOBBY,

Now Robert, please tell me THAT YOU HAVE SEEN THIS VIDEO SERIES?

YOUR WORDS: So, as I have Written MANY times to you, I DO NOT WASTE MY TIME on Cartoonic Videos. Sunday, May 1st 2016 at 12:44PM

Then you have been dismissed...

Brothers and Sisters, from my read of The Negro Project by Margaret Sanger, Did you know that Margaret Sanger had a clinic in Harlem. Here let me share this one with you.

The Harlem Clinic In 1929, 10 years before Sanger created the Negro Project, the ABCL laid the groundwork for a clinic in Harlem, a largely black section of New York City. It was the dawn of the Great Depression, and for blacks that meant double the misery. Blacks faced harsher conditions of desperation and privation because of widespread racial prejudice and discrimination. From the ABCL’s perspective, Harlem was the ideal place for this experimental clinic, which officially opened on November 21, 1930. Many blacks looked to escape their adverse circumstances and therefore did not recognize the eugenic undercurrent of the clinic.

The clinic relied on the generosity of private foundations to remain in business.18 In addition to being thought of as inferior and disproportionately represented in the underclass, according to the clinic’s own files used to justify its work, blacks in Harlem: were segregated in an over-populated area (224,760 of 330,000 of greater New York’s black population lived in Harlem during the late 1920s and 1930s); comprised 12 percent of New York City’s population, but accounted for 18.4 percent of New York City’s unemployment; had an infant mortality rate of 101 per 1000 births, compared to 56 among whites; had a death rate from tuberculosis237 per 100,000that was highest in central Harlem, out of all of New York City.19 Although the clinic served whites as well as blacks, it was established for the benefit of the colored people. Sanger wrote this in a letter to Dr. W. E. Burghardt DuBois,20 one of the day’s most influential blacks. A sociologist and author, he helped found the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909 to improve the living conditions of black Americans. That blacks endured extreme prejudice and discrimination, which contributed greatly to their plight, seemed to further justify restricting their numbers.

Many believed the solution lay in reducing reproduction. Sanger suggested the answer to poverty and degradation lay in smaller numbers of blacks. She convinced black civic groups in Harlem of the benefits of birth control, under the cloak of better health (i.e., reduction of maternal and infant death; child spacing) and family planning. So with their cooperation, and the endorsement of The Amsterdam News (a prominent black newspaper), Sanger established the Harlem branch of the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau. The ABCL told the community birth control was the answer to their predicament. Sanger shrewdly used the influence of prominent blacks to reach the masses with this message. She invited DuBois and a host of Harlem’s leading blacks, including physicians, social workers, ministers and journalists, to form an advisory council to help direct the clinic so that our work in birth control will be a constructive force in the community. She knew the importance of having black professionals on the advisory board and in the clinic; she knew blacks would instinctively suspect whites of wanting to decrease their numbers. She would later use this knowledge to implement the Negro Project. Sanger convinced the community so well that Harlem’s largest black church, the Abyssinian Baptist Church, held a mass meeting featuring Sanger as the speaker. But that event received criticism. At least one very prominent minister of a denomination other than Baptist spoke out against Sanger. Dr. Adam Clayton Powell Sr., pastor of Abyssinian Baptist, received adverse criticism from the (unnamed) minister who was surprised that he’d allow that awful woman in his church. Grace Congregational Church hosted a debate on birth control. Proponents argued birth control was necessary to regulate births in proportion to the family’s income; spacing births would help mothers recover physically and fathers financially; physically strong and mentally sound babies would result; and incidences of communicable diseases would decrease.

Opponents contended that as a minority group blacks needed to increase rather than decrease and that they needed an equal distribution of wealth to improve their status. In the end, the debate judges decided the proponents were more persuasive: Birth control would improve the status of blacks.25 Still, there were others who equated birth control with abortion and therefore considered it immoral. Eventually, the Urban League took control of the clinic, an indication the black community had become ensnared in Sanger’s labyrinth.

- See more at: http://www.cwfa.org/the-negro-project-marg...

Wow!!!

/*
Is This TheSmokingGun?
http://www.inquisitr.com/3044556/donald-tr... … #BillCosby #Farrakhan #onWURD #CCPedu #TempleU #Berean #Boulware #Butler #TheStoryPlant #News
>
~ 'It Worked For Hitler, Why Not Trump?' ~
http://blackhistory.com/content/290970/it-...
http://www.inquisitr.com/3044556/donald-tr...
*/

Ron, who is George Grant?

Author or Co-Author Edit
The American Vision, 1984
Bringing in the Sheaves: Replacing Government Welfare with Biblical Charity, 1985, ’89, ’95
In the Shadow of Plenty: Biblical Principles for Welfare, 1986, ’98, 2009
The Dispossessed: Homelessness in America, 1986
To the Work: A Handbook for Church Diaconal Ministry, 1986
The Changing of the Guard: The Vital Role Christians Play in America’s Unfolding Cultural Drama, 1987, ’95
The Catechism of the New Age: A Response to Dungeons and Dragons, with Peter Leithart, 1987
Rebuilding the Walls: A Biblical Strategy for Restoring America's Greatness, with Peter Waldron, 1987
Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood, 1988, ’93, ’98, 2000
Trial and Error: The American Civil Liberties Union and Its Impact on Your Family, 1989, ’93
The Legacy of Planned Parenthood, 1989
Third Time Around: The History of the Pro-Life Movement from the First Century to the Present, 1990, 2010
Clean Air: A Citizen's Handbook for Media Accountability, with Peter Leithart, 1990
In Defense of Greatness: How Biblical Character Shapes A Nation's Destiny, with Peter Leithart, 1990
The Walls Came Tumbling Down: The Fall of Communism in Our Time, with Peter Leithart, 1990
The Blood of the Moon: Understanding the Conflict between Islam and Western Civilization, 1991, 2001
The Quick and the Dead: RU-486 and the New Chemical Warfare Against Your Family, 1991
Homelessness In America: Its Causes and Its Cures, 1991
Unnatural Affections: The Impuritan Ethic of the Modern Church, 1991
The Last Crusader: The Untold Story of Christopher Columbus, 1992
Hillarious: The Wacky Wit, Wisdom, and Wonderment of Hillary Rodham-Clinton, 1992
Perot: The Populist Appeal of Strong-Man Politics, 1992
The 57% Solution: A Conservative Strategy for the Next Four Years, 1993
Where Do We Go From Here: An Agenda for Conservatives During Cultural Captivity, 1993
Legislating Immorality: The Homos*xual Movement Comes Out of the Closet, with Mark Horne, 1993
The Family Under Siege: What the New Social Engineers Have in Mind for Your Children, 1994
The Micah Mandate: Balancing the Christian Life, 1995, ’99, 2010
Killer Angel: A Biography of Margaret Sanger, 1995, 2000, 2010, 2014
The Dittohead’s Little Instruction Book, 1996
You Might Be a Liberal If, 1996
Our Character, Our Future: Reclaiming America’s Moral Destiny, with Alan Keyes, 1996
Immaculate Deception: The Shifting Agenda of Planned Parenthood, 1996
Buchanan: Caught in the Crossfire, 1996
Moral Earthquakes, with O.S. Hawkins, 1996
Bless This Food, with Karen Grant and Julia Pitkin, 1996
The Patriot’s Handbook: A Citizenship Primer, 1996, 2001
Carry a Big Stick: The Uncommon Heroism of Theodore Roosevelt, 1996
Faithful Volunteers: The History of Religion in Tennessee, with Stephen Mansfield, 1997
Letters Home: Counsel from the Sages of the Past to their Loved Ones, with Karen Grant, 1997
Logomorphs: A Politically Incorrect Dictionary, 1997
The Reader’s Journal: The Stirling Bridge Classics Program, 1997
Best Friends: Lessons from Extraordinary Relationships through the Ages, with Karen Grant, 1998
Kids Who Kill: Confronting our Culture of Violence, with Gov. Mike Huckabee, 1998
Y2K: A Novel, with Michael Hyatt, 1998
Just Visiting: How Travel Has Enlightened Lives Throughout History, with Karen Grant, 1999
Lost Causes: The Romantic Attraction of Defeated Men and Movements, with Karen Grant, 1999
Shelf Life: How Books Have Changed the Destinies of Men and Nations, with Karen Grant, 1999
Going Somewhere: A Dan and Bea Adventure, 1999
Christmas Spirit: The Celebrations of the Season, with Gregory Wilbur, 1999
The Pocket Patriot: Citizenship Basics for the New Millennium, 2000
The Christian Almanac: Each Day in History, with Gregory Wilbur, 2000, ’02
Garden Graces: How the Tasks of Gardening Have Shaped Art, Music, and History, with Karen Grant, 2001
The Absolutes: The Indisputable Principles of Civilized Society, with James Robison, 2002
Center of the Storm: Practicing Principled Leadership in Times of Crisis, with Katherine Harris, 2002
An Emerging Nation: The American War of Independence, 2003
The Importance of the Electoral College, 2004
The Courage of Theodore Roosevelt, 2005
On the Road to Independence, with Gary DeMar, 2006
Cheerful Givers, 2008
The American Patriot's Handbook: The Writings, History, and Spirit of a Free Nation, 2009, 2016
Editor Edit
Homos*xuality, the Military, and the Future: The Moral and Strategic Crisis, editor, 1993
Gays in the Military: A Caveat Collection, editor, 1993
Hero Tales: How Common Lives Reveal the Uncommon Genius of America, editor, 2000
From Bannockburn to Flodden: Tales by Sir Walter Scott, editor, 2001
From Gileskirk to Greyfriars: Tales by Sir Walter Scott, editor, 2001
From Glencoe to Stirling Bridge: Tales by Sir Walter Scott, editor, 2001
From Montrose to Culloden: Tales by Sir Walter Scott, editor, 2001
Q and I: An Arthur Quiller-Couch Anthology, editor, 2003
Parish Life: A Thomas Chalmers Anthology, editor, 2003
Thomas Jefferson, by John Morse, editor, 2005
George Washington, by Henry Cabot Lodge, editor, 2005
The Expulsive Power of a New Affection: A Sermon by Thomas Chalmers, editor, 2007, 09
A Sabbath Psalter: Scripture Readings by Thomas Chalmers, editor, 2010

Brother Doctor Gregory V Boulware I am away from my desk right now but I will read: Is this the smoking gun and ~ 'It Worked For Hitler, Why Not Trump?' ~

Steven George Grant is a author who wrote The Biography of Margaret check it out...

Brother Doctor Gregory V Boulware I am away from my desk right now but I will read: Is this the smoking gun and ~ 'It Worked For Hitler, Why Not Trump?' ~

Steven George Grant is a author who wrote The Biography of Margaret check it out...

???

George Grant: Killer Angel: A Biography of Margaret Sanger, 1995, 2000, 2010, 2014

Brother Doctor Gregory V Boulware I just read Is This TheSmokingGun?
http://www.inquisitr.com/3044556/donald-tr...

By Paula Mooney April 29, 2016 WOW!!! This would be truly a SMOKING GUN. I would keep an eye on this story, WOW!!!

Brother Doctor Gregory V Boulware, this should be a blog all by it's self. WOW!!!

That is one good reason why I am on this blog with my notes for this very same reason, If
'It Worked For Hitler, Why Not Trump?' The scenario is similar in history.

This would be a great time to revert back to my notes on this subject.

During Hitler’s regime, the Germans were supplied with elaborate charts and complicated theses, supposedly proving the superiority of the German people. It is interesting to note that, at the bottom of theses charts were the colored people of the world, most conspicuously, the black people.’ FLOYED McKISSICK National Director of Racial Equality, 1967

The often over looked FACT about the German Holocaust is that the Nazis just did not target the Jewish population, they went after the black community as well. Under the threat of being sent to concentration camps if they did not cooperate. Afro-German citizens were not only forced to undergo sterilization themselves, they were also required to turn over their children for sterilization. In his book Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler explain the motivation behind such programs.

“The Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland… It suits the purpose of the cool calculating Jew who use this means of introducing a process of bastardization in the very center of the European continent and, by infecting the white race with the blood of an inferior stock, would destroy the foundations of its independent existence.” ADOLF HITLER MEIN KAMPTF

It worked for Sanders too, and Julius Caesar. It's called oratory.

Veni Vidi Vici

My notes continue MAAFA 21 2 of 13 The Nazis attitude toward blacks was clearly defined in a 1944 book by Robert Ley, who was the head of the German Labor Front. Ley characterized the Jewish race as a diseased riddled parasite, that had been created by unnatural inbreeding between WHITE MEN and the racially inferior Negro. He described the result as a racial swap that would eventually destroy the natural superiority of the Aryan race. Another Nazis publication deicide blacks is African brutes who had not been tamed by centuries of slavery. It went on to say that any effort to assimilate people of African descent into civilized society was a waste of time and that the lynching of blacks in America did not merit any regret.

While you are re-playing German history, you' ve got anti-hate Hispanics smashing up police cars and putting their children on the street to chant "fuk Trump".

I don't have anything going Steven but the history of this blog. By the way, as I refer back to my notes of MAAFA 21 2 of 13.

Since World War TWO, it has been well documented that Adolf Hitler was profoundly influenced by the American EUGENIS movement and that many of his government’s racial policies were actually develop from the writings of the American EUGENICSIS like MADISON GRANT, in fact, Hitler referred to GRANTS book “THE PASSING OF THE GREAT RACE as his Bible.
Meanwhile, American EUGENICSIS was routinely praising Hitler and holding up the Nazi EUGENICS program as a model for the United States to copy. The Leader of the German Nation, Adolf Hitler, has been able to construct a comprehensive racial policy a population development an improvement. The difference between a Jew and the Aryan is as unsurmountable as that between black and white. Germany has set a pattern which other nations must follow. DR. CLARENCE GORDON CAMPBELL President of The American Eugenics Research Association 1935

We can all breathe a little easier tonight. Big wins for Trump and Sanders.

Perfect...

The war watch in the Republican Party is on now. It work for Hitler, now let's see if it works for trump.

I heard on one of the news shows how abused are comparisons to Hitler. Anyone it seems is subject to this triteness.

Ok!!! With that said, let me highlight more from my notes of MAAFA 21.

Among those American eugenicists who most strongly supported the Nazis, was a member of The American Eugenics Society, a director of the American Birth Control League and a writer for the Birth Control Review, his name was LOTHROP STODDARD. As a avowed racist STODDARD was a author of a book called The Rising Tide of Color against white world supremacy which was widely promoted by The Ku Klux Klan. In another book, The Dragon In The Cross, STODDARD was identified as the exalted cyclops of the Massachusetts chapter of the klan.
“NON-white race must be excluded from America… The red and the black races if left to themselves revert to a savage or semi-savage state in a short time.” LOTHROP STODDARD Director, American Birth Control League

Lothrop Stoddard sound like a racist, and if I was interested I'd check. So you are indicting Sanger as editor of the Birth Control Review?

One of Sanger's first magazines was called Woman Rebel, a magazine she began publishing in 1914, another magazine she wrote was the Birth Control Review was a lay magazine established and edited by Margaret Sanger in 1917.

What do you think of this Steven, of Sangers view's: Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

Birth Control Review was a lay magazine established and edited by Margaret Sanger in 1917, three years after she coined the term "birth control" to describe voluntary motherhood or the ability of a woman to space children "in keeping with a family's financial and health resources.".[1] Sanger published the first issue while imprisoned with Ethel Byrne, her sister, and Fannie Mindell for giving contraceptives and instruction to poor women at the Brownsville Clinic in New York.[2][3] Sanger remained editor-in-chief until 1928, when she turned it over to the American Birth Control League[1]

Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies, to assist couples who wish to prevent overproduction of offspring and thus to reduce the burdens of charity and taxation for public relief, and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
The results desired are obviously selective births. By this I mean a selection based on the prospects for a successful and happy babyhood, childhood, and eventual citizenship. It would be an eminent gain for society if the number of births could vary in direct ratio to prospects for adequate care of children.

The development of latent powers and the mastery over nature are responsible for whatever advances man has made away from his primordial states of states of animalism and savagery. Out of an initial stage of ignorance as to what caused births, through a prolonged stage of superstition regarding these phenomenon, the race has advanced into scientific knowledge of how to control births in other ways than by abstinence from natural living. But this knowledge is not universal. A fortunate few who have it who have it are indifferent about sharing it with others, and there are large groups who deliberately and energetically strive to prevent its spread. It is this condition, doubtless more than any other factor, which has produced the six million children who are public charges.

More than one million women have written me, some of them tragic, pitiful letters, asking for advice on how to prevent unwanted additions to families already too large. According to our present Federal laws it is forbidden to convey the desired information either through the mails or by common carriers. Some of these women are tuberculosis, some have heart trouble, some have no means of support. Others have equally valid reasons for wanting to know the technique of prevention, but if a physician were to write a letter, even to one of his own patients, giving advice where to go for contraceptive instruction, and were to mail that letter, he could be sent to the penitentiary for doing so.

A fight to remove such restrictions is being conducted by the National Committee on Federal Legislation for Birth Control, of which I am president. Bills are now pending before the Senate and the House of Representatives , which, if passed, will permit the use of the mails and common carriers for contraceptive information and supplies intended for use by licensed physicians, chartered medical colleges, licensed hospitals and clinics, and by druggists in legitimate prescription business.

An extremely important factor in regulating population growth is education. Of no less importance is technical assistance. To meet these needs an extension of birth control clinics is necessary. At present there are in the United States about 157 birth control clinics, some of them restricted as to the help they may give. We need thousands of clinics, with greatly enlarged scope of activity. For this reason I suggest the following as the next article of the proposed Baby Code:

Why did you skip Article 2 Ron?

Steven, this is a prime example of weak attempt to HI-jack this blog. This information is great if I had asked you for it but I didn't.

What do you think of this Steven, of Sangers view's: Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit and have to go to the government for a permit to have child, what do you think of that, Steven?

I'll answer the question on article one but I haven't read the permit part yet so that will have to wait. As an aside Ron, there is no way I'm hijacking your blog. But I'm not going to agree to these little bits of no-context quotes. When Margaret Sanger wrote article one, what was meant by the unfit was those thought capable of passing on negative traits, such as blindness. You would know that if you made even a small effort to fill in the bits.

Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

This is what Sanger wanted to force into law Steven, what do you think about that?

That's not article 4 and that's not article 6.

Article 2. Birth control clinics shall be permitted to function as services of city, county, or state health departments, or under the support of charity, or as non-profit self-sustaining agencies, subject to inspection and control by public authorities.
The important function of birth control clinics may in the future include advice for those who wish to have children as well as for those seeking a limitation. I do not mean to imply that clinical or medical advice can at present be as effective in birth promotion as it is in birth control, but nevertheless I feel that the advance of physiology, biology, and medicine may add notably to effectiveness in dealing with those who are barren and the sterile through functional disorders so that such persons may become parents when they want to do so. At any rate, I want to make the point that the tragedy of the babies is not so much that the grand total is too large, but that there are too many in families that do not want them, cannot take care of them, and should not have them.

If education, technical assistance, and public opinion fail to limit the number of babies within certain groups of the population to the country’s capacity for taking care of them, then it may be advisable to adopt more drastic procedure. I hesitate to suggest when this might be, because so many of us Americans are afraid of any new forms of “regimentation.” It will probably always be said that s*x relations and parenthood are matters too intimate for any interference by public authorities. Of course, there is already a considerable amount of interference, or, if you prefer the term, regulation through marriage and divorce laws. I wonder if it will also become necessary to establish a system of birth permits. At present a marriage license is a birth permit, as well a a permit for a man and a woman to maintain a common household. Suppose, for purposes of discussion of something that may not prove to be practicable, we add the following clauses to the proposed Baby Code:

Article 3. A marriage license shall in itself give husband and wife only the right to a common household and not the right to parenthood.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood.
Article 5. Permits for parenthood shall be issued upon application by city, county, or state authorities to married couples, providing they are financially able to support the expected child, have the qualifications needed for proper rearing of the child, have no transmissible diseases, and, on the woman’s part, no medical indication that maternity is likely to result in death or permanent injury to health.
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
All that sounds highly revolutionary, and it might be impossible to put the scheme into practice. But for purposes of discussion let the clauses stand. Suppose that we had such regulations, and suppose that couples went ahead and had children without permits and regardless of the law. Well, we should be no worse off in the matter of births than we are now. Certainly the regulations would not increase the production of children in the wrong families; the tendency would be the other way. However, a general respect for the law regarding birth permits might be fostered by punishing transgressors. Society could not very well put a couple into jail for having a baby without permission; and in the case of paupers a fine could not be collected. How then should the guilty be punished? By blacklisting? By depravation of certain civil rights, such as the right to vote? If punishment is not practicable, perhaps we can go the other way around and consider awards. If it is wise to pay farmers for not raising cotton or wheat, it may be equally wise to pay certain couples for not having children.

Considering this question leads us inevitably to the question of quotas. What is social planning without a quota? But a little thinking soon reveals the difficulty of establishing any numerical quota for births. It does not seem feasible to fix a given number of births as desirable for a county, or any other political division, during a particular year. Variations of birth rate within social classes might not affect the total number and yet might in one county improve the situation and in another make it worse. But perhaps something might be done by seeking a definite ratio between the birth rate and an index of child welfare, this index to be the opposite of what we may call child illfare. I suggest the following clause:

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

"....without doubt one of the most important you will ever watch....... the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour.

This 137 minute film ...... in keeping with the rules of chess, white always makes the first move and this move was made centuries ago.

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray

................. his ..........SUBJECT

?????????????????????????????

------ or 'whiteMan' steveAdam and 'blackHebrewIsraelite' FIGHT to the BOTTOM of racistIGNORANCE

*************************************************

'blackHebrewIsraelite' ELEVATES the RACIST NONSENSE ...ABORTION????... of 'whiteMan' steveAdam

"....BOBBY...tell me THAT YOU HAVE SEEN THIS VIDEO SERIES?

YOUR WORDS: ......I DO NOT WASTE MY TIME on Cartoonic Videos. ...
Sunday, May 1st 2016 at 3:09PM
Deacon Ron Gray

I heard on one of the news shows how abused are comparisons to Hitler. Anyone it seems is subject to this triteness.
Wednesday, May 4th 2016 at 10:00AM
Steve Williams

*******************************************

".....Ok!!! ......from my notes of MAAFA 21. .....American eugenicists who .....supported the Nazis, ......Rising Tide of Color against white world supremacy .......promoted by The Ku Klux Klan. ....... STODDARD was identified as the exalted cyclops of the Massachusetts chapter of the klan. ......NON-white race must be excluded from America… The red and the black races if left to themselves revert to a savage or semi-savage state in a short time.”

Wednesday, May 4th 2016 at 11:45AM
Deacon Ron Gray

************************************

The BIA African American Family is NOT ELEVATED by "WHITE...steveAdam/'blackHebrewIsraeliteDEACON" 4000+ HITS of NONSENSE.....

........ STOP DUMBING down this African American Family wwwebsite.......

......... DISMISS >LEAVE>........DISMISS yourselves

Steven, YOUR REPLY: That's not article 4 and that's not article 6. Thursday, May 5th 2016 at 3:54AM

What is not article 4 and that's not article 6? both say that you should have a PERMIT to have children and I asked you what do you think. In your repost of article 4 and that's not article 6?

Let me Highlight 4 and that's not article 6 again

Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit for parenthood.

and

Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

Now what do you mean That's not article 4 and that's not article 6?

What do you mean?

There are four commentators and an unknown number of observers on this blog Robert. Unless you've had some private communication, you don't know anything about the elevation status of the observers. I've been elevated but there may be some disagreement whether I'm part of the "BIA African American Family". We know you are not elevated Robert so that leaves Ron and Greg. Why don't you ask them.

As usual Ron I'm talking about context. You could just as easily posted this entire article to begin with. It's not that long.

Article 7. Every country shall be assisted administratively by the state in the effort to maintain a direct ratio between the county birth rate and its index of child welfare. Whenever the county records for any given year show an unfavorable variation from this ratio the county concerned shall be taxed by the state according to the degree of the variation. The revenues thus obtained shall be expended by the state within the given county either in giving financial support to birth control clinics or in other ways calculated to improve the situation involved.
Assuming that the social workers and statisticians would not have serious difficulty in devising and keeping up an index of child welfare, the proposed scheme would, I think, be effective. The main result would be the creation of a strong community sentiment in favor of helping those couples who wish to prevent conception because they foresee that the children if born would be doomed to suffering. For the couples who are not willing to cooperate moral pressure would be brought to bear.

Finally we have the problem of how to stop reproduction by those who are recognised as biologically unfit, or who have inheritable diseases. According to the report of experts made at the famous White House Conference on Child Health and Protection, there were in 1930 more than 10,000,000 handicapped children in the United States. This total included those improperly nourished, the tuberculous, those with weak or damaged hearts, the crippled, blind, and deaf, those with defective speech, and the mentally retarded, delinquent, and dependent. A large proportion of these were doomed before they were born. Now that they are here we must take care of them, at enormous cost. Billions of dollars must be raised ever year by taxation or charitable contribution to pay for the treatment and care of individuals who have been handicapped for birth.

Many groups of the socially unfit, as for example the feeble-minded and the criminal, are not sufficiently susceptible to education or the moral pressure of the community. For such people sterilization is indicated. Some states already have sterilization laws, and others should adopt similar measures. While there must be ample safeguards in administering such laws so that the rights of the individual are considered, the paramount need is to protect society as a whole. Sterilization would go far in reducing human misery, not to speak of the financial saving in the upkeep of the unfit offspring. Therefore I suggest the following clause in the Baby Code:

Article 8. Feeble-minded persons, habitual congenital criminals, those afflicted with inheritable disease, and others found biologically unfit by authorities qualified judge should be sterilized or, in cases of doubt, should be so isolated as to prevent the perpetuation of their afflictions by breeding.
I do not pretend in the above suggestions to have arrived at the formulation of a workable baby code, but my puzzling over this problem has convinced me that America needs such a code. I should be very much interested in hearing the suggestions of others.

This is the great day of social planning. We have come to believe in planning the production and distribution of goods. We plan methods of governing cities, states, and the nation. We plan jobs, and leisure-time activities, and vacations. We plan almost everything, big and little, except families. It can scarcely do any harm and it may do a vast amount of good to engage in thoughtful, planning of our population, a population with a still larger percentage of happy families.

And going back to the beginning:

America Needs a Code for Babies

A Plea for Equal Distribution of Births by Margaret Sanger

It has been officially reported that six million children in the United States are being supported by public relief funds. This tragic indictment of our social system indicates, among other things, that there has been an overproduction of babies, or, at least, an improper distribution of them, so that the couples who have the most babies are the very ones who are least able to take care of them.

While the N.R.A. strives through its many codes to increase employment and thus to raise the purchasing power of the people in general, it does not provide for lightening the burden of the parents by reducing the number of mouths that each wage-earner must feed or which the public must feed for him. While the N. R. A. has ↑as↓ its emblem the blue eagle, I am afraid that the six million pauperized children have as their emblem a stork that has the blues. America needs a baby code!! And I want to make a few suggestions that might be considered in the formulation of such a code:

https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/webedi...

Steven,

YOUR REPLY: As usual Ron I'm talking about context. You could just as easily posted this entire article to begin with. It's not that long.

I asked you a question on the highlighted articles. Article 4 is posted in it's entirety and I also asked you for your comments on that. Also I asked you on the first sentence of Article 6, as well. So, Steven, I am asking you about your thoughts on Article 4 and 6, can you do that?

No Ron, I can't do that, but I'm happy to comment on the article in its entirety.

No problem Steven, Article 4 is posted in it's entirety comment on that, can you do that?

If I did that Ron I'd be drawn into your irrationality.

Then Steven, tell me, why are you here?

Back to my notes on this Subject of MAAFA 21 PART 3of 13 that I want to share. Like always, I open this material to the floor for serious discussion because it is nothing more important than a serious dialog of the education and our future of our Hebrew people.

On the 19th of December 1939 during a four-month stay in Germany, LOTHROP STODDARD was given a personal meeting with both Adolf Hitler and a man who would eventually be in charge in the Nazi holocaust, SS leader Heinrich Himmler.

Later when a course on race was introduced at Hell University in Germany, it’s instructor stated that it would be modeled on the philosophies of American legion EUGENIC including LOTHROP STODDARD law firm. Eventually STODDARD’S racial views would be featured, in Nazi school’s textbooks.

I see why you are fixated on the Nazis since they are the only ones in this 2 1/2 hour video that had anything to do with "black genocide".

If you want to have a serious dialog, An American Dilemma would provide a better basis.

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

"....without doubt one of the most important you will ever watch....... the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour.

in keeping with the rules of chess, white always makes the first move and this move was made centuries ago.

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray

................. his ..........SUBJECT

?????????????????????????????

------ or 'whiteMan' steveAdam and 'blackHebrewIsraelite' ..... MASTER slaveTorture......

".....If I did that Ron I'd be drawn into your irrationality. ..."
Thursday, May 5th 2016 at 12:38PM
Steve Williams

****************************

"....Then Steven, tell me, why are you here?..."

Thursday, May 5th 2016 at 6:11PM
Deacon Ron Gray

*******************************************

1864-2016......the Slave Accepts the mastersTorture and racistlyIgnorant belief

AND

stereotypically like the slaves of oldeMisconception....'deaconBlack' looks to 'whiteSupremacy' for APPROVAL

Steven,

The material base right here in this documentary is good enough to talk about for a while now.

Steven, I asked you a question, YOUR STATEMENT:If I did that Ron I'd be drawn into your irrationality. Thursday, May 5th 2016 at 12:38PM Then Steven, in reply to you, "Then Steven tell me, why are you here?"

Now you come back to me with this weak reply, that you want to direct this blog to other material, I don't think so. Now answer my question:

Then I asked you this: Then Steven, tell me, why are you here?

Because I'm learning a lot Ron. That's the benefit of reading.

But I have no interest in reading Stoddard.

I am asking you, what have you learned?

Why don't you have any interest in Stoddard?

I learned about:

The Descent of Man
Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development
Women and the New Race
An American Dilemma

I won't bother with Stoddard because he has nothing to offer.

Then Steven, that is where you need to be on that blog where the American Dilemma
Is being discussed. On this blog is about Maafa 21 and the documentary material.

Steven, if you have nothing to say on the subject, I suggests that you reframe from commenting on this blog with that unrelated material.

I'm just killing time until you move on to someone else Ron. What's your facination with Stoddard?

Now which one is it, you have no interest in reading Stoddard or What's your facination with Stoddard?
Friday, May 6th 2016 at 7:57PM "WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT NOW STEVEV? WHAT IS "FACINATION?"

Don't you have a spell check over their? Do you want to they this again?

Do I want to they this again?

I'll they it another way Ron. In your search for racists you were wrong about Darwin, wrong about Galton, wrong about Sanger. With Myrdal you were not only wrong, but you have done a huge disservice to your readership by attempting to cast him as one. With Stoddard you finally hit pay dirt. Congratulations. Now what else you got?

Steven,

What are you talking about? First you said this: "What's your facination with Stoddard?" Friday, May 6th 2016 at 7:57PM Now you say this: "Do I want to they this again?" Are you on that 💩? You are not making a clear thought.

Steven, you remember, Margaret Sanger papers on Birth Control and Racial Betterment," that the 1919 congress rejected that contained her writings like this: “Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.” Now you can see the CODE WORDS like racial betterment, the race toward the elimination of the unfit. She have already mentioned things about the negro.
Steven remember in my notes of MAAFA 21 we reviewed Sangers goals: Despite the falsehoods of Malthus' overpopulation claims, Sanger nonetheless immersed herself in Malthusian eugenics. Grant wrote she argued for birth control using the “scientifically verified” threat of poverty, sickness, racial tension and overpopulation as its background. Sanger's publication, The Birth Control Review (founded in 1917) regularly published pro-eugenic articles from eugenicists, such as Ernst Rudin.7 Although Sanger ceased editing The Birth Control Review in 1929, the ABCL continued to use it as a platform for eugenic ideas.
Also you remember my notes on The Harlem Clinic she ran. In 1929, 10 years before Sanger created the Negro Project, the ABCL laid the groundwork for a clinic in Harlem, a largely black section of New York City. It was the dawn of the Great Depression, and for blacks that meant double the misery. Blacks faced harsher conditions of desperation and privation because of widespread racial prejudice and discrimination. From the ABCL's perspective, Harlem was the ideal place for this “experimental clinic,” which officially opened on November 21, 1930. Many blacks looked to escape their adverse circumstances and therefore did not recognize the eugenic undercurrent of the clinic. The clinic relied on the generosity of private foundations to remain in business.18 In addition to being thought of as “inferior” and disproportionately represented in the underclass, according to the clinic's own files used to justify its “work,” blacks in Harlem:

You do remember this permit question that I asked you don’t you?
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit… Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
This is what Sanger wanted to force into law Steven, what do you think about that?
So where was I wrong about Sanger?

I see that you make no comments when I was unlocking my review of the MAAFA 21 documentary but yet you wait some three segments later to say that I am wrong. Where is your back bone?

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

".. the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour..... white always makes the first move and this move was made centuries ago. ..."

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray

*****************************

'blackDeacon' MISCONCEPTION #1....there is NO, Never Was a "global black community"

------- there are though MANY Coloured People......'brownTanBlackWhiteRedOlive and ALBINO'

************************************

BUT your REAL title of this cartoonicVideo FALSEHOOD of 'blackGENOCIDE'.......SHOULD BE.......

"...Maafa21...PART 1 of 13.... stereotypically slave need for'whiteSupremist' APPROVAL.."

***************************************************

selfIdentified......'whiteMan' steveAdam and 'blackHebrewIsraelite take us down MISCONCEPTION lane.......

"...Because I'm learning a lot Ron. That's the benefit of reading. ...."
Friday, May 6th 2016 at 1:13PM
Steve Williams

"... am asking you, what have you learned? ... Why don't you have any interest in Stoddard? ...."

Friday, May 6th 2016 at 2:05PM
Deacon Ron Gray

"...I won't bother with Stoddard because he has nothing to offer....."

Friday, May 6th 2016 at 4:22PM
Steve Williams

*************************************

and 'whiteMan' rejection LEADS to Filth, Decadence and isolation in ghettoISM

**************************************************************

"...Are you on that 💩? You are not making a clear thought...."

Saturday, May 7th 2016 at 9:38AM
Deacon Ron Gray

*******************************************

'blackDeacon'........this is 2016 and America has Lived and Succeeded with

.....8 years of the Son of Africa Asia.... Greatest American Presidency......Baraaka Hussein Obama

AND

1. 'blackPeople' are Free

2. 'blackPeople' ..... made of by euroRACIST paganChristianity 1492-1864 are Sons of Africa Asia

3. 'blackPeople' ..... can RESEARCH and USE ..... History, Scholarship and Science of Africa Asia

4. 'blackPeople'.......With Free Minds, and Purpose are African American FAMILIES of Africa Asia

LEAVE that selfProclaimed BIA 'whiteMan' steveAdam.......ALONE and LEARN from of Africa Asia

LEAVE that selfProclaimed BIA 'whiteMan' steveAdam.......ALONE and LEARN from of Africa Asia Saturday, May 7th 2016 at 10:55AM

He is a good example for all to see Robert. What have you learned about Steven, Robert?

What do you mean Ron, wait some three segments later to say you're wrong?

Show me where Sanger ever referred to a black race or a white race.

When I posted my notes on the review of Darwin, Galton, Sanger and Myrdal, you said little to nothing about my comments but what you did do was to try and change the subject, that is what I mean.

I said I have no interest in Stoddard and wonder why you, Ron, are fascinated with him. What's confusing about that?

Your words Ron:



Don't you have a spell check over their? Do you want to they this again?


Friday, May 6th 2016 at 11:20PM
Deacon Ron Gray

"Do you want to 'they' this again"

Great catch... It should read: "Do you want to try this again?" I guess not, since you have not corrected yourself!!!

Don't let Pride get in your way from the truth.

There's nothing prideful about fat fingers on a little iPhone keyboard. Fascination not facination.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

".. the west........... white always makes the first move and this move was made centuries ago. ..."

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray

*****************************

'blackDeacon' MISCONCEPTION #2.... NO, Never....do the 'whiteEuropean' racistPagans Understand Monotheism

".....LEAVE that selfProclaimed BIA 'whiteMan' steveAdam.......ALONE and LEARN from of Africa Asia Saturday, May 7th 2016 at 10:55AM

He is a good example for all to see Robert. What have you learned about Steven, Robert? ...."

Saturday, May 7th 2016 at 11:22AM
Deacon Ron Gray

*************************************************************

1. that the NO GOOD selfProclaimed 'whiteMan' of BIA is the 'blackHebrewIsraelite' master

2. that the ebolaBIA, steveAdam can write ANYTHING to you and you call him masterSTEVEN......

3. that YOU, have to get his APPROVAL........from kingJames or ANY europeanDEFINITION

4. that YOU and NIIGGGEERRINO steveAdam are the same 'whiteBlack' Misconception

5. that YOU and NIIGGGEERRINO steveAdam BOTH.... NEVER, ever ACCEPT African Asian Scholarship......

Then you have learned nothing Bobby...

That AfricanAsian is code for Arabic.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

".. the west........... white always makes the first move and this move was made centuries ago. ..."

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray

*****************************

WEST of WHAT?.....ATLANTIC TO PACIFIC is AFRICA ASIA

".......Then you have learned nothing Bobby... "

Sunday, May 8th 2016 at 9:26AM
Deacon Ron Gray

**********************************************

"....That AfricanAsian is code for Arabic. ..."

Sunday, May 8th 2016 at 9:33AM
Steve Williams

***************************************************

again.....for the 1,258th TIME, slave of steveAdam......MY NAME IS Robert Powell or powellRobert

AND

I, ROBERT POWELL.... 'blackHebrewIsraelite' and 'whiteMan' steveAdam .... DO KNOW in 2016

1. .....that you TWO are racistlyIgnorant twinParts of the paganChristian 'blackWhite' MISCONCEPTION

2. .....that you TWO are racistlyIgnorant twinParts of 'whiteSupremist' FRAUD with euroONLY definitions

3. .....that Africa Asia is from ATLANTIC to INDIAN to PACIFIC OCEANS....minus euroSUEZ canal.........

4.......that BOTH of you COLOURED 'blackWhite'-'whitBlack' redNeck people

....should LEAVE the African American Family site for yourOWN FALSEHOOD COLOURED sites....

Still you have learned nothing... Let us go back to the topic of this blog. Have you seen this material Robert?

I've finished the first seven chapters of Myrdal, chapter seven being the one referenced in your video. No sign of a racist, just the opposite.

Thank You for your opinion Steven but I still want to share my notes of the topic of MAAFA 21 3 of 13.

By the way Steven, did you ever share your thoughts on this: Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit… Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.
This is what Sanger wanted to force into law Steven, what do you think about that now that you had the time to read the full articles?

I want to keep your comments on Article 4 and 6 for right now, can you do that?

Sanger was not "trying to force into law" articles 4 and 6. All the articles together were posed for discussion, as she clearly states. Your video has a serious crediblity issue. Their treatment of Myrdal seems to be a blatant deception. What do you think about that Ron?

What do you think about Sangers proposal for women, have to go and get a permit to have a child?

I think it was a reasonable suggestion.

How So Steven?

We have permits for marriage, permits for building, permits for weapons and permits for all sorts of things. Birth rates affect society as a whole so I think it's reasonable to require a permit to have a child.

Then HARRY, why don't you leave this country!!!

SUBJECT

........ ABORTION

Maafa 21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America.... PART 1 of 13

Posted By: Deacon Ron Gray

***************************************************

"....Thank You for your opinion Steven but I still want to share my notes of the topic of MAAFA 21 3 of 13.

By the way Steven, did you ever share your thoughts on this: Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit… Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth....... what do you think about that now that you had the time to read the full articles? ...............can you do that? ......"

Sunday, May 8th 2016 at 2:55PM
Deacon Ron Gray

**********************************************************

".....Your video has a serious crediblity issue. Their treatment of Myrdal seems to be a blatant deception. What do you think about that Ron?...."

Sunday, May 8th 2016 at 3:26PM
Steve Williams

***************************************************

I KNOW that abortion is not GENOCIDE
I KNOW that abortion is not 'blackPeople' GENOCIDE

68 I Q HARRY KNOWS.......

"....I am coming to realize that you Mr. Ron might the most STUPIDEST Black American man I've ever met!

It is said that when the truth is rejected God always give the individual a devil for a companion and God has given the White Steve William to you! Enjoy him! ....."

Monday, May 9th 2016 at 12:10AM
Harry Watley

*****************************************************************

no RETARDANT harry

.....ronDeacon 'blackHebrewIsraelite' is JUST LIKE YOU..RACISTLY IGNORANT ... 2016... 'blackMaleProphat"

.....ronDeacon 'blackHebrewIsraelite' is JUST LIKE YOU..RETARDANT of History or Scholarship of AfricaAsia

.....ronDeacon 'blackHebrewIsraelite' is JUST LIKE YOU..a slave of 'whiteSupremists' LIKE EBOLA ... steveAdam

Thank you again for making my point HARRY. Our people are here and I was one of those American Blacks who answered the call to defend this country and I will practice my rights as a citizen of this Country and to HELL with this statement of yours: "If you want to stay in this White country than the White Steven William is right and you should have no argument with him! It is as simply as that Mr. Ron you STUPID-ASS! Harry Watley Sunday, May 8th 2016 at 8:11PM"

You poor old control sad man. You said that because Steven happens to be white!!!

I talk to Steven because he is a man. It is sad that you still think as a BOY!!!

Harry, what do you think about Article 4?

You already have 42 million Harry, why do you need more?

HARRY,

When I answered that call was in the early 70's and I am sure that you could not qualify to take the test. By the way HARRY, What country do you live in right NOW? Knucklehead?

As far as living in our own sovereign nation as you being the so-call first Ginuwine Prophet, I have not seen this book called LIFE or seen a place of worship or I have not heard this prophet promote The Most High's word anywhere. But yet he has the nerve to talk against people who do, that sounds like a false prophet to me.

Now back to this topic. HARRY, have you seen this documentary material of MAAFA 21 yet?

HARRY,

When I answered that call was in the early 70's and I am sure that you could not qualify to take the test. By the way HARRY, What country do you live in right NOW? Knucklehead?

As far as living in our own sovereign nation as you being the so-call first Ginuwine Prophet, I have not seen this book called LIFE or seen a place of worship or I have not heard this prophet promote The Most High's word anywhere. But yet he has the nerve to talk against people who do, that sounds like a false prophet to me.

Now back to this topic. HARRY, have you seen this documentary material of MAAFA 21 yet?

HARRY, Steven is talking to you. Do you see what Steven said: "You already have 42 million Harry, why do you need more? " Steve Williams Monday, May 9th 2016 at 11:12AM

Bull**** Harry. You haven't said a damn thing about 84 million. Ever.

Yes Harry two are better than one. But who is number two?

Harry, every leader has a second-in-command. All these years and you haven't even got that far.

SUBJECT

Maafa21 .......... PART 1 of 13

'blackHebrewIsraelites' WILL answer

------- to 'selfProclaimed' ... 'whiteMen' steveAdam and FELLOW RACIST.....68 IQ selfProclaimed 'blackProphats'

AND continue the Maafa 1-13-1,000,000.....nonsense RACISM of paganChristian ABORTION in 2016

***************************************

STOP all of youBROTHERS from this RETARDISM at BIA, an African American FAMILY site

Harry, you are wrong about Article 4. There are too many people in the world and it needs to stop. Including in Harry Land.

Poor HARRY don't understand what you are saying when you said that There are too many people in the world and it needs to stop. Including in Harry Land. Brake that down for him, can you do they?

Poor HARRY don't understand what you are saying when you said that There are too many people in the world and it needs to stop. Including in Harry Land. Brake that down for him, can you do they?

Nobody can break through to Harry Land. You know that Ron.

The best we can hope for is "this will be my last comment!"

Hahaha!!! He might still come through to answer you and I can't wait

Nope.

Ron, are we still on Article 4?

YES! I see that you have taken the position that are too many people in the world and it needs to stop. Including in Harry Land. That sounds like CODE TALK to me. Now HARRY has always talked about Black people and now I hear you saying that it is too many Black people as well but poor HARRY would not pick up on that.

Steven that is the kind of thinking that I want to expose so all can see that this kind of thinking still goes on to this day. This kind of thinking led up to Article 5. Permits for parenthood shall be issued upon application by city, county, or state authorities to married couples, providing they are financially able to support the expected child, have the qualifications needed for proper rearing of the child, have no transmissible diseases, and, on the woman’s part, no medical indication that maternity is likely to result in death or permanent injury to health.

This means that big government can come into the bedroom. I am so glad that the law makers of that time ran sanger and her followers out of town with that LAW proposal.

Steven, Thank You for your honesty.

We have permits for marriage, permits for building, permits for weapons and permits for all sorts of things. Birth rates affect society as a whole so I think it's reasonable to require a permit to have a child.
Sunday, May 8th 2016 at 7:15PM
Steve Williams | delete

That was my reply to you Ron, not Harry. It contains no imaginary code words.

Poor HARRY,

You can't even handle a statement from Steven without running to the hills WOW!!! this is a great TEACHING moment not only for Steven but have you notice the hit numbers? This blog was started on Tuesday, April 12th 2016 at 9:23AM and it will not be a month old until Friday of next week and over 4100 hits have already been contributed to this blog, meaning our people are viewing this blog with interest and many of our youth are learning about MAAFA 21 for the very first time.

HARRY, you are trying to fit your square subject into a round whole and you have found out that you cannot compete and you are out gunned because you have no knowledge of this subject matter. So, if you care about this subject, I recommend that you view this material and make a comeback or continue on your path and run from this subject because of your lack of knowledge.

Combat your ignorance HARRY, with the light of truth. Enjoy your run.

Poor Harry.

Ron, since Harry ran off again, shall we move on to Article 5?

Do you really think that it is to many Black people in America?

I said there are too many people, period. I would revise Article 5 though.

I asked you about Black people in America. "Do you really think that it is to many Black people in America or HARRY'S LAND?

Harry Land has only one resident and I don't think he'll need a baby permit anytime soon.

Why are you avoiding Article 5 Ron? It stands together with Articles 4 and 6.

Your readership is waiting.

I asked you about Black people in America. "Do you really think that it is to many Black people in America?"

I meant what I said Ron, what I've always told you, on another blog too. THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD. America is in the world and Black people live in America. Now man up to your critique of Sanger's baby code and let's talk about Article 5.

Did you ever use a rubber Harry, or did you just leave your seed behind wherever you went? That's a scary thought.

The patriarch is dying a hard death but the younger generation is learning.

Harry, I see that you agree with Ron. I have five sons, but only five grandchildren. That's the way it should be. Zero population growth.

I also want to see the races mix.

FINALLY after 4300+ HITS by 'blackHebrewWhiteMen68IQ retardants'.......Genocide maafa21... 1-4300+

I finally READ a comment with a chuckle...that is ON SUBJECT with BIA membership Ideals

".....I asked you about Black people in America. "Do you really think that it is to many Black people in America?.."

Thursday, May 12th 2016 at 10:02PM
Deacon Ron Gray

".....THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD. America is in the world and Black people live in America..."

Thursday, May 12th 2016 at 10:37PM
Steve Williams

"...Since.... White Steve Williams feels that they are too many people in the world his White ass should be the first to volunteer to voluntarily kill himself! ....."

Friday, May 13th 2016 at 2:14AM
Harry Watley

*****************************************************

BOTTOM line 'blackWHiteRedYellow' Identification

---is a RACISTLY IGNORANT evil/decadence given to the Family of Adaam(as) by the euroPaganChristians..

---is a PERPETUAL civilWar and genocide with no 2016 winners....

---is NOT, NEVER was an African Asian Monotheistic Belief from the Creator of Adaam(as)

HARRY stop being so emotional and explain yourself.

What do you having five grandsons have to do with zero population growth?

Harry, I didn't say each of my sons had one child. My oldest has two with a Salvadoran. My middle has three with a Hollander. My second oldest is married but I don't know, his wife's biological clock is ticking. My two youngest it's too early to say, but they live in California and Californians are notorious for mixing the races.

Even if there are two more, they will take the place of me and their grandmother. Zero population growth is just a first baby step.

Steve, I want to be very clear Here, are you saying in your last reply is what you call zero population?

Ron, zero population growth means we would stay at seven billion. That would be a very good thing.

After that I'd try to roll it back to 4 billion.

You're a dinosaur Harry, a dying breed.

I'm wondering how many misbegotten children you're leaving behind Harry.

WHAT THE FLACK are you doing HARRY? You can't explain yourself better then that. What you did was to say the same thing twice, uh man!!!

Harry, you keep picking up your marbles and going home, never to return. Yet here you are.

Everybody dies Harry, but there are still more born than die.

When we were born Harry, the world poputation was under 3 billion. Now it's 7.4 billion. What needs to die is your dumbass religion.

You keep asking what is our permanent solution? It begins with birth control.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_popu...

What is the benefit of low-income women having children?

Research has shown that the WIC Program has been playing an important role in improving birth outcomes and containing health care costs.7,20 A series of reports published by USDA based on linked 1988 WIC and Medicaid data on over 100,000 births found that every dollar spent on prenatal WIC participation for low-income Medicaid women in 5 States resulted in:

longer pregnancies;
fewer premature births;
lower incidence of moderately low and very low birth weight infants;
fewer infant deaths;
a greater likelihood of receiving prenatal care; and
savings in health care costs from $1.77 to $3.13 within the first 60 days after birth.3,4,5

http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/about-wic-how-...

Ms. Sanger was not an abortionist, was not a racist, and did not target black Americans.

America Needs a Code for Babies

A Plea for Equal Distribution of Births by Margaret Sanger

It has been officially reported that six million children in the United States are being supported by public relief funds. This tragic indictment of our social system indicates, among other things, that there has been an overproduction of babies, or, at least, an improper distribution of them, so that the couples who have the most babies are the very ones who are least able to take care of them.

While the N.R.A. strives through its many codes to increase employment and thus to raise the purchasing power of the people in general, it does not provide for lightening the burden of the parents by reducing the number of mouths that each wage-earner must feed or which the public must feed for him. While the N. R. A. has ↑as↓ its emblem the blue eagle, I am afraid that the six million pauperized children have as their emblem a stork that has the blues. America needs a baby code!! And I want to make a few suggestions that might be considered in the formulation of such a code:

https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/webedi...

You're a baby boomer too Harry. That was then and this is now. We can choose the old ways or we can find a new way. All of America's problems can be traced to population. We need to manage our population intelligently. Religion gets in the way.

SUBJECT

Maafa 21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America.... PART 1 of 13

"..For decades people of African decent have accused the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour. "

.......No, deacon'blackHebrewIsraelite'......African Asian People have ACCUSED... by History, Scholarship and Science the RECORDED theft, rape, torture and murder of African Asian People by euroRacistly Ignorant people..

and 'blackMan'..'blackProphat' 68IQ RETARDANT cowardlyDeleter from a YMCA(christian)Pool.. states above...

"......Your stupid ass Robert needs to get out of Prophet Mohammed's camp and come into your own camp since you are not an Arab man!......."

Saturday, May 14th 2016 at 10:14AM
Harry Watley

***************************************

Mohamed (saw) gave The Family of Adaam(as) Direction from the Creator of Adaam(as) and Monotheism

---------" there is NO DIFFERENCE in an Arab from a nonArab"....We are... Arab because we speak Arabic

AND Maintain the Monotheistic ORIGINAL African Asian Language til NOW...2016

*************************** englishTranslation..transliteration

Sûrat AlHijr

(The Rocky Track - Solid Track) XV

Bismillaah irRahmaan ir Raheem

1. Alif Lâm Râ.

2. Those who disbelieved will greatly wish that they had submitted themselves to Allâah’s Will of Monotheism...

3. Leave them to eat and enjoy Dunyaah,(Dunyaah--Life of Disbelief of Monotheism),

Let them be preoccupied with hope.

They will come to know!

6. They say:

"O you Mohamed, to who AdDhikr(AlQur’âan) has been sent down!

Truly, you are an incorrect man!

7. "Why do you not bring Angels to us if you are of the truthful diviners?"

8. We do not send the angels except with the Truth of judgement, and in that case, the disbelievers would have no respite of the actions!

9. We Who have sent down AdDhikr, AlQur’âan and, We will guard it's PURITY. [1]

10. We sent Messengers before you Mohamed, among the communities before.

12. Thus do We let polytheism, and disbelief enter the hearts of AlMujrimûn (criminals, polytheists and pagans) because of their mocking at the Messengers.

14. Even if We opened to them a gate from Heaven and they were to ascend continuosly,

15. They would surely say,

"Our eyes have been dazzled, we have not seen any angel or heaven.

No, we are a people that have seen mirages."

[1]
(V.15:9)

This Verse is a challenge to Mankind and everyone is obliged to believe in the miracles of AlQur’âan.

It is a clear fact that more than 1430+ years have elapsed and not a single word of AlQur’âan has been changed, although the disbelievers tried their utmost to change it in every way, but they failed in their efforts.

As it is mentioned in this Ayah: "We will guard it." By Allâah! ..........He has guarded it. IT's Original

All the other Words of the Creator of Adaam(as) in [AtTaurât, AlInjeel.] have been corrupted in the form of additions or subtractions or alterations in the original text.

AlQur'aan in 2016 is still maintained in its Original form by Arabic Memorization of the Original Words of the Creator by LEGIONS of Believers in every corner of the Earth....from America to Africa Asia and Europe.

/*
"We Shall Control Them and Eliminate Them!"
...Give Them Drugs, Guns, Money, and a sense of limited Freedom, and We Shall Be Relieved of The Negro In America! Give Them An Argument and Let Them Fight Amongst Themselves...They Will Kill Themselves Off and Relieve Us Of The Burden!

~“Maafa: Life After Conquest”~ (7,318 hits) 11.29.14 - 5.14.16

"When Spider Webs Unite, They Can Tie Up A Lion!"

How - Where Is It possible For A Human Being To Have Peace Where There Is No Justice?

“Blacks are not my equal – they are far below us!”
“We shall declare war on this Negro Dilemma!”
“Eugenics will save the day!”
~Francis Galton~

'DIVIDE AND CONQUER!'
http://blackinamerica.com/content/273292/m...
*/

HARRY,

Wasn't you engaged in a conversation Steven and never did reply about that comment about that includes HARRY. False prophet, you dropped the ball and now you want to run away, GTF out of here!!! Don't bring you ass back here until you have viewed this material.

Greg, where can I find those Galton "quotes"? I'll bet nowhere.

Harry, your blog doesn't make any sense.

Let us get back to a few of my notes of MAAFA 21. On the 19th of December 1939 during a four-month stay in Germany, LOTHROP STODDARD was given a personal meeting with both Adolf Hitler and a man who would eventually be in charge in the Nazi holocaust, SS leader Heinrich Himmler.

Later when a course on race was introduced at Hell University in Germany, it’s instructor stated that it would be modeled on the philosophies of American legion EUGENIC including LOTHROP STODDARD law firm. Eventually STODDARD’S racial views would be featured, in Nazi school’s textbooks.

“The white race divided into three main sub-species, the Nordics, the Alpines and the Mediterranean’s. All three are good stocks, ranking in genetic worth well above the various of colored races.” LOTHROP STODDARD Director, American Birth Control League.

To eliminate blacks from German one of the people Hitler called on, was a eugenicist would had once written that Blacks are an inferior race of savages, who should only be allowed to survive as long as they are of use to the Aryan race, his name was Eugen Fisher. About twenty years earlier, he had been one of the leaders of a system of concentration camps in southwest Africa, where blacks were rounded up to be executed, experimented on or held there as free labor. Under Hitler Fisher would serve on committees that planned the sterilization of all Blacks, in countries they came under German control. He would also be one of the first Nazis scientist to become publicly affiliated with the Carnegie funded eugenicist laboratory in Cold Spring Harbor in New York. Eventually, Fisher would also be put in charge of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute which was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. It was here many of the Nazis programs for creating racial purity were developed.

Steven, you remember, Margaret Sanger papers on Birth Control and Racial Betterment," that the 1919 congress rejected that contained her writings like this: “Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.” Now you can see the CODE WORDS like racial betterment, the race toward the elimination of the unfit. She have already mentioned things about the negro.

I'm still on Article 5. I'm trying to get to Article 6.

You do remember: Margaret Sanger papers on Birth Control and Racial Betterment," that the 1919 congress rejected that contained her writings like this: “Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.” Now you can see the CODE WORDS like racial betterment, the race toward the elimination of the unfit. She have already mentioned things about the negro.

This contains Article 5.

You do remember: Margaret Sanger papers on Birth Control and Racial Betterment," that the 1919 congress rejected that contained her writings like this: “Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.” Now you can see the CODE WORDS like racial betterment, the race toward the elimination of the unfit. She have already mentioned things about the negro.

This contains Article 5.

Margaret Sanger, "Birth Control and Racial Betterment," Feb 1919.

Published article. Source: Birth Control Review, Feb. 1919. , Library of Congress Microfilm 131:0099B .

Birth Control and Racial Betterment

By Margaret Sanger

Before eugenists and others who are laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must first clear the way for Birth Control. Like the advocates of Birth Control, the eugenists, for instance, are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit. Both are seeking a single end but they lay emphasis upon different methods.

Eugenists emphasize the mating of healthy couples for the conscious purpose of producing healthy children, the sterilization of the unfit to prevent their populating the world with their kind and they may, perhaps, agree with us that contraception is a necessary measure among the masses of the workers, where wages do not keep pace with the growth of the family and its necessities in the way of food, clothing, housing, medical attention, education and the like.

We who advocate Birth Control, on the other hand, lay all our emphasis upon stopping not only the reproduction of the unfit but upon stopping all reproduction when there is not economic means of providing proper care for those who are born in health. The eugenist also believes that a woman should bear as many healthy children as possible as a duty to the state. We hold that the world is already over-populated. Eugenists imply or insist that a woman's first duty is to the state; we contend that her duty to herself is her duty to the state.

We maintain that a woman possessing an adequate knowledge of her reproductive functions is the best judge of the time and conditions under which her child should be brought into the world. We further maintain that it is her right, regardless of all other considerations, to determine whether she shall bear children or not, and how many children she shall bear if she chooses to become a mother. To this end we insist that information in regard to scientific contraceptives be made open to all. We believe that if such information is placed within the reach of all, we will have made it possible to take the first, greatest step toward racial betterment and that this step, assisted in no small measure by the educational propaganda of eugenists and members of similar schools, will be taken.

One fundamental fact alone, however, indicates the necessity of Birth Control if eugenics is to accomplish its purpose. Unless contraceptives are used, a child is likely to be born within a year of the last one. Even when the mother is exceptionally robust this frequent child-bearing is a heavy drain upon her system and nine times in ten, it is a drain upon the offspring. The mother's system has not had time to replenish itself with those elements which have been so radically diminished in bringing the child to birth, and of course it has not had time to establish that reserve stock of these same elements which are necessary to the strength and well-being of the next child. The mother's health is more than likely to be wrecked and the later children are almost sure to fall short of that nervous and muscular health which might otherwise have been theirs. Thus we hold that the fruits of the most perfect eugenic marriage are likely to be bad health in the mother and in the later children, if Birth Control is not utilized for the purpose of properly spacing the progeny.

This principle asserts itself in all of the economic layers of society but its effects may be modified to a considerable extent by those women who have the means to provide adequate care of themselves during the ante-natal period and adequate care of the child after it is born. With the great masses of the people, however, such care is either exceedingly difficult or impossible. Among the great majority of wage-workers, the frequent arrival of children means not only the wrecking of the mother's health and the physical handicapping of the child, but often the disheartening and demoralization of the father, the stunting of the children through bad living conditions and early toil, and in that generation or the next, the contributing of morons, feeble-minded, insane and various criminal types to the already tremendous social burden constituted by these unfit.

While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit. They are excellent means of meeting a certain phase of the situation, but I believe in regard to these, as in regard to other eugenic means, that they do not go to the bottom of the matter. Neither the mating of healthy couples nor the sterilization of certain recognized types of the unfit touches the great problem of unlimited reproduction of those whose housing, clothing, and food are all inadequate to physical and mental health. These measures do not touch those great masses, who through economic pressure populate the slums and there produce in their helplessness other helpless, diseased and incompetent masses, who overwhelm all that eugenics can do among those whose economic condition is better.

Birth Control, on the other hand, not only opens the way to the eugenist, but it preserves his work. Furthermore, it not only prepares the ground in a natural fashion for the development of a higher standard of motherhood and of family life, but enables the child to be better born, better cared for in infancy and better educated.

Birth Control of itself, by freeing the reproductive instinct from its present chains, will make a better race. A family subsisting upon a certain wage will naturally give better care to one or two children upon that wage than it would do four or six or eight or ten, and the two children are much less likely to have to go into child labor factories and sweat-shops than are the eight or ten. The situation is too plain for argument.

Concrete examples of the eugenic effects of Birth Control are the most convincing evidence. In Holland, where Birth Control is taught in clinics conducted by nurses specially trained for that purpose, military statistics show that the average stature of men has increased four inches in thirty years. Ninety per cent. of the men were fit for army service, while in the United States, less than 50 per cent. were.

The fighting qualities of the French poilu, his endurance, and his fitness have been the amazement of military authorities in the Great War. The present generation of Frenchmen, as everyone knows who remembers the horror with which "anti-race suicidists" greeted the French tendency to Birth Control, is the product largely of Birth Control methods.

Eugenics without Birth Control seems to us a house builded upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit. It cannot stand against the furious winds of economic pressure which have buffeted into partial or total helplessness a tremendous proportion of the human race. Only upon a free, self-determining motherhood can rest any unshakable structure of racial betterment.

In 1919 the world population was under 2 billion. In less than 100 years it has almost quadrupled, to 7.4 billion. We are headed for disaster.

And that's exactly what maafa means. Disaster.

In 1920 blacks were 9.9 percent of the population, at 10.4 million. In 2010 blacks were 13.6 percent of the population, at 42 million.

http://blackdemographics.com/wp-content/up...

So, you agree with Sanger and her group, that there are to many Black people in America?

The evidence is that the black population in America has increased in proportion with the rest of the world. It doesn't support the assertion of "black genocide".

Ron, Sanger makes it clear she's talking about the human race:

Eugenics without Birth Control seems to us a house builded upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit. It cannot stand against the furious winds of economic pressure which have buffeted into partial or total helplessness a tremendous proportion of the human race. Only upon a free, self-determining motherhood can rest any unshakable structure of racial betterment.

To eliminate blacks from German one of the people Hitler called on, was a eugenicist would had once written that Blacks are an inferior race of savages, who should only be allowed to survive as long as they are of use to the Aryan race, his name was Eugen Fisher.

Malthusian Eugenics

Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology prevailed in the early 20th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused racial supremacy and "purity"," particularly of the "Aryan" race. Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by encouraging the "fit" to reproduce and the "unfit" to restrict their reproduction. They sought to contain the "inferior" races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion.
‘"Civil rights’ doesn’t mean anything without a right to life!" declared Hunter. He and the other marchers were protesting the disproportionately high number of abortions in the black community. The high number is no accident. Many Americans–black and white–are unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger’s Negro Project. Sanger created this program in 1939, after the organization changed its name from the American Birth Control League (ABCL) to the Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA).

The aim of the program was to restrict–many believe exterminate–the black population. Under the pretense of "better health" and "family planning," Sanger cleverly implemented her plan. What’s more shocking is Sanger’s beguilement of black America’s créme de la créme–those prominent, well educated and well-to-do–into executing her scheme. Some within the black elite saw birth control as a means to attain economic empowerment, elevate the race and garner the respect of whites.

The Negro Project has had lasting repercussions in the black community: "We have become victims of genocide by our own hands," cried Hunter at the "Say So" march.

Who is Hunter?

Is MLK a "black elite"?

Negro Project—1939-1942

Beginning in 1939, DuBois served on the advisory council for Sanger’s “Negro Project,” which was designed to serve African Americans in the rural South. The advisory council called it a “unique experiment in race-building and humanitarian service to a race subjected to discrimination, hardship, and segregation (Chesler 1992).
In a letter to philanthropist Albert Lasker, from whom she hoped to raise funds for the project, Sanger wrote that she wanted to help
A group notoriously underprivileged and handicapped to a large measure by a “caste” system that operates as an added weight upon their efforts to get a fair
share of the better things in life. To give them the means of helping themselves is perhaps the richest gift of all. We believe birth control knowledge brought to this group, is the most direct, constructive aid that can be given them to improve their immediate situation (Sanger, 1939, July).

http://www.trustblackwomen.org/2011-05-10-...

Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.

In 1966, the year Sanger died, the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. said
There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger’s early efforts. …Our sure beginning in struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her (King, 1966).

In 1966, Planned Parenthood Federation of America inaugurated the PPFA Margaret Sanger Award to honor the woman who founded America's family planning movement. The PPFA Margaret Sanger Award is given annually to individuals of distinction in recognition of excellence and leadership in furthering reproductive health and reproductive rights.
In its first year, the award was bestowed upon The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr., for "his courageous resistance to bigotry and his lifelong dedication to the advancement of social justice and human dignity"
Dr. King's award was presented on May 5, 1966. Mrs. Coretta Scott King delivered her husband's acceptance speech on his behalf. Before reading Dr. King's speech, Mrs. King declared, "I am proud tonight to say a word in behalf of your mentor, and the person who symbolizes the ideas of this organization, Margaret Sanger. Because of her dedication, her deep convictions, and for her suffering for what she believed in, I would like to say that I am proud to be a woman tonight." Following is Dr. King’s acceptance speech read by his wife, Mrs. Coretta Scott King.
Family Planning — A Special and Urgent Concern

by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
Recently, the press has been filled with reports of sightings of flying saucers. While we need not give credence to these stories, they allow our imagination to speculate on how visitors from outer space would judge us. I am afraid they would be stupefied at our conduct. They would observe that for death planning we spend billions to create engines and strategies for war. They would also observe that we spend millions to prevent death by disease and other causes. Finally they would observe that we spend paltry sums for population planning, even though its spontaneous growth is an urgent threat to life on our planet. Our visitors from outer space could be forgiven if they reported home that our planet is inhabited by a race of insane men whose future is bleak and uncertain.
There is no human circumstance more tragic than the persisting existence of a harmful condition for which a remedy is readily available. Family planning, to relate population to world resources, is possible, practical and necessary. Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess.
What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victims.
It is easier for a Negro to understand a social paradox because he has lived so long with evils that could be eradicated but were perpetuated by indifference or ignorance. The Negro finally had to devise unique methods to deal with his problem, and perhaps the measure of success he is realizing can be an inspiration to others coping with tenacious social problems.
In our struggle for equality we were confronted with the reality that many millions of people were essentially ignorant of our conditions or refused to face unpleasant truths. The hard-core bigot was merely one of our adversaries. The millions who were blind to our plight had to be compelled to face the social evil their indifference permitted to flourish.
After centuries of relative silence and enforced acceptance, we adapted a technique of exposing the problem by direct and dramatic methods. We had confidence that when we awakened the nation to the immorality and evil of inequality, there would be an upsurge of conscience followed by remedial action.
We knew that there were solutions and that the majority of the nation were ready for them. Yet we also knew that the existence of solutions would not automatically operate to alter conditions. We had to organize, not only arguments, but people in the millions for action. Finally we had to be prepared to accept all the consequences involved in dramatizing our grievances in the unique style we had devised.
There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger's early efforts. She, like we, saw the horrifying conditions of ghetto life. Like we, she knew that all of society is poisoned by cancerous slums. Like we, she was a direct actionist — a nonviolent resister. She was willing to accept scorn and abuse until the truth she saw was revealed to the millions. At the turn of the century she went into the slums and set up a birth control clinic, and for this deed she went to jail because she was violating an unjust law. Yet the years have justified her actions. She launched a movement which is obeying a higher law to preserve human life under humane conditions. Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision; for without them there would have been no beginning. Our sure beginning in the struggle for equality by nonviolent direct action may not have been so resolute without the tradition established by Margaret Sanger and people like her. Negroes have no mere academic nor ordinary interest in family planning. They have a special and urgent concern.
Recently the subject of Negro family life has received extensive attention. Unfortunately, studies have overemphasized the problem of the Negro male ego and almost entirely ignored the most serious element — Negro migration. During the past half century Negroes have migrated on a massive scale, transplanting millions from rural communities to crammed urban ghettoes. In their migration, as with all migrants, they carried with them the folkways of the countryside into an inhospitable city slum. The size of family that may have been appropriate and tolerable on a manually cultivated farm was carried over to the jammed streets of the ghetto. In all respects Negroes were atomized, neglected and discriminated against. Yet, the worst omission was the absence of institutions to acclimate them to their new environment. Margaret Sanger, who offered an important institutional remedy, was unfortunately ignored by social and political leaders in this period. In consequence, Negro folkways in family size persisted. The problem was compounded when unrestrained exploitation and discrimination accented the bewilderment of the newcomer, and high rates of illegitimacy and fragile family relationships resulted.
For the Negro, therefore, intelligent guides of family planning are a profoundly important ingredient in his quest for security and a decent life. There are mountainous obstacles still separating Negroes from a normal existence. Yet one element in stabilizing his life would be an understanding of and easy access to the means to develop a family related in size to his community environment and to the income potential he can command.
This is not to suggest that the Negro will solve all his problems through Planned Parenthood. His problems are far more complex, encompassing economic security, education, freedom from discrimination, decent housing and access to culture. Yet if family planning is sensible it can facilitate or at least not be an obstacle to the solution of the many profound problems that plague him.
The Negro constitutes half the poor of the nation. Like all poor, Negro and white, they have many unwanted children. This is a cruel evil they urgently need to control. There is scarcely anything more tragic in human life than a child who is not wanted. That which should be a blessing becomes a curse for parent and child. There is nothing inherent in the Negro mentality which creates this condition. Their poverty causes it. When Negroes have been able to ascend economically, statistics reveal they plan their families with even greater care than whites. Negroes of higher economic and educational status actually have fewer children than white families in the same circumstances.
Some commentators point out that with present birth rates it will not be long before Negroes are a majority in many of the major cities of the nation. As a consequence, they can be expected to take political control, and many people are apprehensive at this prospect. Negroes do not seek political control by this means. They seek only what they are entitled to and do not wish for domination purchased at the cost of human misery. Negroes were once bred by slave owners to be sold as merchandise. They do not welcome any solution which involves population breeding as a weapon. They are instinctively sympathetic to all who offer methods that will improve their lives and offer them fair opportunity to develop and advance as all other people in our society.
For these reasons we are natural allies of those who seek to inject any form of planning in our society that enriches life and guarantees the right to exist in freedom and dignity.
For these constructive movements we are prepared to give our energies and consistent support; because in the need for family planning, Negro and white have a common bond; and together we can and should unite our strength for the wise preservation, not of races in general, but of the one race we all constitute — the human race.
About two weeks after the award ceremony, Dr. King wrote the following letter to Cass Canfield, chairman of the Executive Committee of the PPFA — World Population Emergency Campaign:
Dear Mr. Canfield:
Words are inadequate for me to say how honored I was to be the recipient of the Margaret Sanger Award. This award will remain among my most cherished possessions. While I cannot claim to be worthy of such a signal honor, I can assure you that I accept it with deep humility and sincere gratitude. Such a wonderful expression of support is of inestimable value for the continuance of my humble efforts.
Again let me say how much I regret that at the last minute urgent developments in the civil rights movement made it impossible for me to be in Washington to personally receive the award. My wife brought glowing echoes of the wonderful reception and impressiveness of the total occasion.
I am happy to be the recipient of the Margaret Sanger Award and I can assure you that this distinct honor will cause me to work even harder for a reign of justice and a rule of love all over our nation.
Sincerely yours,
Martin Luther King Jr.

I will get back to this real soon.

In my opinion that was a sad day.

Maybe Dr. King knew something you don't.

Or it could be the other way around!!! We will never know.

MLK wasn't addicted to sound bites though.

Please, let us not talk about areas you don't know of, OK!

I watched your video Ron, it's chock full of sound bites.

I will get back to my notes soon.

The aim of the program was to restrict–many believe exterminate–the black population. Under the pretense of "better health" and "family planning," Sanger cleverly implemented her plan. What’s more shocking is Sanger’s beguilement of black America’s créme de la créme–those prominent, well educated and well-to-do–into executing her scheme. Some within the black elite saw birth control as a means to attain economic empowerment, elevate the race and garner the respect of whites.

Can you support those statements Ron?

I.e. "proof" them?

Here is my proof Steven which was found back in my notes on this subject of Abortion: Black Genocide in 21st Century America.

In the early 20th century the white elitist who made up the eugenics movement were no longer just a phosphor or academics but now they are industrialist and billionaires who had come to embrace the world view that was essentially identical to the eugenics movement. The same individuals and corporations who had once made millions from the backs of slaves, where now willing to spend millions to get rid of the children of the former slaves. Now that did not mean that these guys’ wanted to be public Crusaders for the eugenics movement but they were certainly willing to be the brains and the money behind it but they would hire crusaders to do the dirty work and the primary when they settle upon was a woman named Margaret Sanger.

See Steven if this woman was successful, myself and many of other people here on Black In America would be here today But YAH had other plans.

Sanger was ahead of her time.

What do you mean?

What I mean is that birth control is a good thing. Margaret Sanger stood up for what is right at a time when people like her were persecuted for spreading this simple truth. Also she was anti-abortion but 90 years later there are still women who would would rather kill their babies than prevent them.

Margaret Sanger was not only promotes birth control but she is a advocate for abortions primarily directed at the elimination of the Black Race of people here in the U.S.

To deal with the problem of resistance among the black population, Sanger recruited black doctors, nurses, ministers and social workers ‘in order to gain black patients’ trust’ in order ‘to limit or even erase the black presence in America’.

This woman was crafty and ruthless in her sad attempts to do just that. After some Now, 93 years after Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, 55 years since she served as the President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Sanger’s dream is being realized. Black babies are being slaughtered at an unprecedented rate.

Do you support her actions Steven?

Margaret Sanger was against infanticide and against abortion. I pointed that out to you Ron in her very own words.

You are the one who considers the Texas decision a "victory".

I see you will do anything to avoid talking about globalist Hillary.

Don't try to change the subject here Steven. The information who this woman is, is found in the series of video that I have provided and put right in front of your face for review.

Your last two comments are mute to this conversation. Don't try to change this subject again because you are telling, no "Broadcasting" that you have a weak point on this subject here at hand.

Why did you abandon this thread Ron, now you want to resurrect it)"?

We got 4944 hits. Take a lap.

I did not post this post to take a lap but my goal is still to expose the truth of MAAFA 21 and what it is.

Hillary is part of the truth of maafa 21, a big part.

Not in these series of Documentaries, so, get over it.

That's fine Ron. I know it's easier to avoid her.

This woman was crafty and ruthless in her sad attempts to do just that. After some Now, 93 years after Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, 55 years since she served as the President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Sanger’s dream is being realized. Black babies are being slaughtered at an unprecedented rate.

YOUR WORDS: Sanger was ahead of her time.

I asked you Steven, Do you support Margret Sanger's plan of actions Steven?

Ron, did you ever answer if Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a "black elite"?

I asked you Steven, Do you support Margret Sanger's plan of actions Steven? I would love to hear you answer to my question.

SUBJECT

Maafa 21: Black Genocide in 21st Century America.... PART 1 of 13

"..For decades people of African decent have accused the west of waging a covert war on the global black community and its goal to eradicate all people of colour. "

.......No, deacon'blackHebrewIsraelite'......African Asian People have ACCUSED

... by History, Scholarship and Science the RECORDED slaverAmericana 1492-1864...the GENERATIONAL theft, rape, torture and murder of African Asian People by euroRacistly Ignorant paganChristianity.. !!!!

to OFF SUBJECT, 'blackHebrewIsraelite' and his Racistly Ignorant Twin, bia'whiteMan' steveAdam... blahBlahers

***************************************

"........Ron, did you ever answer if Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a "black elite"?
Saturday, July 9th 2016 at 12:43AM
Steve Williams

I asked you Steven, Do you support Margret Sanger's plan of actions Steven? I would love to hear you answer to my question...."

Saturday, July 9th 2016 at 7:42AM
Deacon Ron Gray

************************************

5000 hits of Eurocentric, RacistlyIgnorant NONSENSE.......

this is BIA, that is more than just a phrase to describe African Americans in the United States. It's a movement that creates awareness and encourages dialogue about relevant issues......

Do at least Respect BIA membership agreement and stop your olde Stereotypical Racist Misconceptions......

this is BIA, that is more than just a phrase to describe African Americans in the United States. It's a movement that creates awareness and encourages dialogue about relevant issues......

And you have nothing more to say on the subject "Maafa21 PART 1 thru 13" How can you bring your behind to this subject without viewing the content, to get a first hand account of this successful subject. All you can see is this blog has over 5000 hits and none of what is written, you cannot refute. WOW!!!

Ron, I already answered that question. Check your notes.

If you did, you could stand by what you said and say it again, FOR THE RECORD.

I'm in full accord with Margaret Sanger.
Tuesday, April 26th 2016 at 1:49PM
Steve Williams | delete

Why Steven?

Why Steven?

I'll look up that answer too Ron, for the record.

What??? You don't know why!!! You got to go and look up that answer, WOW!!! Can you think for yourself? WOW!@!!

The point is Ron, I've answered these questions before. I've said over and over that Sanger is someone to be emilated, BECAUSE SHE WAS ANTI-ABORTION.

CHAPTER X

CONTRACEPTIVES OR ABORTION?

Society has not yet learned the significance of the age-long effort of the feminine spirit to free itself of the burden of excessive childbearing. It has been singularly blind to the real forces underlying the cause of infanticide, child abandonment and abortion. It has permitted the highest and most powerful thing in woman's nature to be hindered, diverted, repressed and confused. Society has permitted this inner urge of woman to be rendered violent by repression until it has expressed itself in cruel forms of family limitation, which this same society has promptly labeled "crimes" and sought to punish. It has gone on blindly forcing women into these "crimes," deaf alike to their entreaties and to the lessons of history.

As we have seen in the second chapter of this book, child abandonment and infanticide are by no means obsolete practices. As for abortion, it has not decreased but increased with the advance of civilization. The reader will recall that one authority says that there are 1,000,000 abortions in the United States every year, while another estimates double that number.

Most of the women of the middle and upper classes in America seem secure in their knowledge of contraceptives as a means of birth control. Under present conditions, when the laws in most states regard this knowledge, howsoever it be imparted, as illicit, and the federal statutes prohibit the sending of it through the mails, even the women in more fortunate circumstances sometimes have difficulty in getting scientific information. Nevertheless, so strong is their purpose that they do obtain it and use it, correctly or incorrectly.

The great majority of women, however, belong to the working class. Nearly all of these women will fall into one of two general groups—the ones who are having children against their wills, and those who, to escape this evil, find refuge in abortion. Being given their choice by society—to continue to be overburdened mothers or to submit to a humiliating, repulsive, painful and too often gravely dangerous operation, those women in whom the feminine urge to freedom is strongest choose the abortionist. One group goes on bringing children to birth, hoping that they will be born dead or die. The women of the other group strive consciously by drastic means to protect themselves and the children already born.

"Our examinations," says Dr. Max Hirsch, an authority on the subject, "have informed us that the largest number of abortions (in the United States) are performed on married women. This fact brings us to the conclusion that contraceptive measures among the upper classes and the practice of abortion among the lower class, are the real means employed to regulate the number of offspring."

Thus a high percentage of women in comfortable circumstances escape overbreeding by the use of contraceptives. A similarly high percentage of women not in comfortable circumstances are forced to submit to forced maternity, because their only alternative at present is abortion. When accidental conception takes place, some women of both classes resort to abortion if they can obtain the services of an abortionist.

When society holds up its hands in horror at the "crime" of abortion, it forgets at whose door the first and principal responsibility for this practice rests. Does anyone imagine that a woman would submit to abortion if not denied the knowledge of scientific, effective contraceptives? Does anyone believe that physicians and midwives who perform abortions go from door to door soliciting patronage? The abortionist could not continue his practice for twenty-four hours if it were not for the fact that women come desperately begging for such operations. He could not stay out of jail a day if women did not so generally approve of his services as to hold his identity an open but seldom-betrayed secret.

The question, then, is not whether family limitation should be practiced. It is being practiced; it has been practiced for ages and it will always be practiced. The question that society must answer is this: Shall family limitation be achieved through birth control or abortion? Shall normal, safe, effective contraceptives be employed, or shall we continue to force women to the abnormal, often dangerous surgical operation?

This question, too, the church, the state and the moralist must answer. The knowledge of contraceptive methods may yet for a time be denied to the woman of the working class, but those who are responsible for denying it to her, and she herself, should understand clearly the dangers to which she is exposed because of the laws which force her into the hands of the abortionist.

Wednesday, April 27th 2016 at 2:06PM
Steve Williams

So sorry, "emulated".

That woman believed in eliminate a race of people, Black People.

merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.
A free race cannot be born of slave mothers. When motherhood becomes the fruit of a deep yearning, not the result of ignorance or accident, its children will become the foundation of a new race.

[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

Give dysgenic groups [people with “bad genes”] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America.

Do you see what this woman is all about from her own words and you stand by this heathen,

Do you still stand by this heathen actions and plans?

Hey Steven, Do you still stand by this heathen actions and plans?

The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members
http://genius.com/Margaret-sanger-letter-f...

Thank you for making my point with this link that contains those words.

I asked you a direct question: "Do you still stand by this heathen actions and plans?"

Your quote and my quote are different, didn't you notice Ron?

Steven, you will find these words in both quotes: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, will you not?

With that said, Thank you for making my point with this link that contains those words.

I asked you a direct question: "Do you still stand by this heathen actions and plans?

What heathen actions and plans Ron? We won't know until we decipher these quotes. Which one did Sanger write?

I took a look at a blast of the past. Take your time and review U.S. History.

What is MAAFA?

Maafa, African Holocaust, Holocaust of Enslavement, or Black Holocaust are political neologisms popularized from 1998 onwards and used to describe the history and ongoing effects of atrocities inflicted on African people, particularly when committed by non-Africans (Europeans and Arabs to be exact, specifically in the context of the history of slavery, including the Arab slave trade and Atlantic slave trade) and argued as "continued to the present day" through imperialism, colonialism and other forms of oppression.